Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 1949 Page 8 of about 527 results (0.073 seconds)

Feb 22 1949 (PC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Calcutta Vs. Messrs. Piggot Chapman and Co ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-22-1949

Reported in : [1949]17ITR317(Cal)

..... must be held that the amount in question was not an item of capital expenditure but was a revenue expenditure allowable as an admissible deduction under section 10(2)(xii) of the income-tax act as it stood before its amendment in 1946. the question raised must, therefore, be answered in the affirmative. the assessee respondent is entitled to ..... mr. mitchell innes wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business was a revenue expenditure so as to be allowable as an admissible deduction under section 10(2)(xii) of the income-tax act (as it stood before its amendment in 1946).'messrs. piggot chapman & co. is a firm of exchange brokers mr. mitchell innes and mr. ..... on the answer as to whether such payment is an item of revenue expenditure or a capital one.section 10 of the indian income-tax act indicates the method for calculating the profits or gains of a business. sub-section (2) of that section recites a number of allowance, of which only clause (xii) is relevant for out purpose. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 1949 (PC)

S.P. Thiruvengadasami Naidu Vs. Municipal Health Officer

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-24-1949

Reported in : 1949CriLJ823; (1949)1MLJ488

..... sanitary officer of krishna that three tanks belonging to the zamindar of chellapalli were injurious to the health of the villagers, the president of the taluk board acting under section 100 of madras act v of 1884 by notice required the owner of the tank to clean, fence, and fill up the tanks, because on inspection it appeared to him to be dangerous to ..... under consideration), contrary to a notification issued in july, 1920, by the municipal council constituted under the repealed act of 1884 purporting to act under section 249 of the new district municipalities act v of 1920, some 21/2 months before the new act was put in force. the learned judges held that the whole procedure was void ab initio and that no conviction can be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1949 (PC)

Sasadhar Ghose Vs. Harihar Kar and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-25-1949

Reported in : AIR1952Cal378

..... is not required at any earlier stage to pass any judicial order as when allowing an appeal to be filed beyond the period of limitation after exercising discretion under section 5, limitation act. 14. we are of opinion that use of the word 'admitted' was intentional & the legislature provided for the deposit of the money to be in time if ..... . j. along with a petn. stating that the applt. had not been able to collect the amount required to be deposited under the proviso to sub section(s) of section 174, bengal tenancy act. the form in which the prayer was made was that the admission of appeal may be put off for a month. this petition was ordered by the ..... the concluding words namely 'no such appeal shall be admitted unless the appellant deposits such amount in court'.3. the application filed by the judgment-debtor under section 174 (8) of the act was disposed of by the subordinate judge by an order dated 10-5-1948, dismissing the same. after allowing time taken for obtaining a certified copy of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1949 (PC)

Rai Harendra Lal Roy Bahadur Estates Ltd. Vs. Hem Chandra Naskar

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-28-1949

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR960

..... after the word 'government' were omitted.12. in the year 1937 proceedings were initiated under the act for the acquisition' by the government of bengal of part of the land comprised in the 1884 patta. the notification under section 6 of the act provided that the land was 'required to be taken by government at the expense of the calcutta ..... in respect of these 3 plots. for the purpose of the present appeal it is only necessary to state that the whole of the compensation awarded under section 28 of the act for the value of the area acquired was awarded to the proprietors.14. being dissatisfied with the awards made by the land acquisition officer both the proprietors ..... and the respondents required this officer to refer the matter of each of the said awards for the determination of the court, and this was duly done under section 18 of the act. the references were heard by the special land acquisition judge, 24 parganas, and on november 7, 1941, the learned judge delivered a single judgment in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1949 (PC)

Qanayat HusaIn and ors. Vs. Mt. Sajidunnisa Bibi and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-28-1949

Reported in : AIR1949All499

..... credit was not a loan, the subsequent mortgage deed was not to be held to be a transaction of loan within the meaning of that term under section 2 (10) (a), u.p. agriculturists' relief act. the same learned judge, however, sitting in a division bench in choudhury padam singh v. kunwar chandra raj saran singh : air1945all144 held as follows:the question ..... even press for an issue on the point-they are not entitled to get the benefit of chap. 5, u.p. agriculturists' relief act. they would, however, be entitled to the benefit of section 9, u.p. debt redemption act, that is, instead of interest being calculated at 6 per cent. with annual rests, they would be liable to pay interest at the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1949 (PC)

Rai Harendra Lal Roy Bahadur Estates Ltd. Vs. Hem Chandra Naskar and A ...

Court : Privy Council

Decided on : Feb-28-1949

Reported in : AIR1949PC179

..... , in acquiring the land compulsorily for the purpose of enabling the construction to be carried out. in the opinion of their lordships, therefore, whichever translation of the 1884 patta is adopted, the appellants as proprietors are entitled to the compensation monies in question. [25] their lordships will, therefore, humbly advise his majesty that this appeal ..... of rent aforesaid after measurement of the proportionate land so acquired." [7] the said kabuliyat contained a clause in corresponding terms. [8] in the year 1884, the lands comprised in the said patta and kabuliyat were surveyed and it was found that the actual land comprised in the patta and kabuliyat was 710 bighas ..... "government" were omitted. [11] in the year 1937, proceedings were initiated under the act for the acquisition by the government of bengal of part of the land comprised in the 1884 patta. the notification under s. 6 of the act provided that the land was "required to be taken by government at the expense of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1949 (FN)

Automobile Workers Vs. WisconsIn Board

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-28-1949

..... other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. the house bill, however, made two changes in that section of the act. first, it was stated specifically that the rights set forth were not to be considered as including the right to commit or participate in unfair ..... is also empowered to prevent. [ footnote 15 ] "both the house bill and the senate amendment, in amending the national labor relations act, preserved the right under section 7 of that act of employees to self-organization, to form, join, or assist any labor organization, and to bargain collectively through representatives of their own ..... in the harnischfeger and armour cases that such a conclusion does not necessarily follow a finding that the employees' activities were concerted: ". . . section 7 of the act expressly guarantees employees the right to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection. we do not interpret .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 28 1949 (FN)

Labor Board Vs. Stowe Spinning Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Feb-28-1949

..... point for decision in this case is whether the board was justified in concluding that the four respondent companies interfered with rights guaranteed by 7 of the wagner act. section 7 provides that "[e]mployees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations. . . ." 49 stat. 452. ..... union, the respondents stowe, acme, perfection, and linford interfered with, restrained, and coerced their employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7 of the act, in violation of section 8(1) thereof." id. 624. [ footnote 2/3 ] "ownership does not always mean absolute dominion. the more an owner, for his ..... purpose" of the discriminatory denial is "to impede, prevent, and discourage self-organization and collective bargaining by the [company's] employees within the meaning of section 7 of the act." north belmont, north carolina, is the home of the four respondents' mills. interlocking directorates and family ties make the four equal one for our purposes .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 1949 (PC)

Balaram Rai and ors. Vs. Mt. Ichha Patrani and ors.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-01-1949

Reported in : AIR1950Ori225

Panigrahi, J.1. The plaintiffs, who have lost in both the Courts below, are the sons of one Fakir Charan Rai who held a revenue-free or muafi grant of the village of Nunia Jampalli in Bargarh Sub. Division of Samblpur district. The defendants are purchasers of Fakir's interest at a court sale in execution of a money decree obtained against the plaintiffs' father.2. The plaintiffs alleged that the village of Nunia Jampalli was granted by HaharajaChhatar Sai to the family of one Lambodar Bai, an ancestor of the plaintiffs, on a permanent and hereditary tenure for doing pujaseba, in the temple of Sri Samaleawari at Samblpur. It is alleged that the grant being one burdened with service and being a Denottar grant, is inalienable and that the court sale in execution of a decree obtained against the plaintiffs' father is void. The plaintiffs admit that the village was being enjoyed in three shares, i.e., an 8 annas share belonging to one Joydeb Bai, a 5 annag 4 pies share belonging to Fakir B...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1949 (PC)

In Re: Wasudeo Narayan Phadnis

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-02-1949

Reported in : (1949)51BOMLR578

..... record his reasons for passing an order of discharge is not quite correct. in a warrant ease, an order of discharge is passed either under sub-section (1) of section 253, when upon taking all the evidence produced in support of the prosecution the magistrate finds that no case against the accused has been made out, ..... of an offence, who has been discharged. reliance is placed on section 369, criminal procedure code, which provides that no court shall alter or review a judgment after it has been signed, except to correct a clerical error. the word ' ..... , the magistrate became functus officio, and that he could not re-hear the complaint, unless his order had been set aside by a superior court, under section 436, criminal procedure code, which empowers a sessions judge or a district magistrate to direct any subordinate magistrate to make further enquiry into the case of any person accused .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //