Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: us supreme court Year: 1973 Page 9 of about 102 results (0.319 seconds)

United States Dept. of Agriculture Vs. Moreno

Court : US Supreme Court

..... could not be sustained absent a "compelling governmental interest." id. at 394 u. s. 631 , 394 u. s. 634 . [ footnote 2/1 ] section 3(e) of the food stamp act provides in relevant part: "the term 'household' shall mean a group of related individuals (including legally adopted children and legally assigned foster children) or non-related ..... april 23, 1973 decided june 25, 1973 413 u.s. 528 appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia syllabus section 3(e) of the food stamp act of 1964, as amended in 1971, generally excludes from participation in the food stamp program any household containing an individual who is unrelated to ..... "it shall also mean (i) a single individual living alone who purchases and prepares food for home consumption, or (ii) an elderly person as defined in this section, and his spouse." [ footnote 4 ] appellees also argued that the regulations themselves were invalid because beyond the scope of the authority conferred upon the secretary by the .....

United States Dept. of Agriculture Vs. Murry

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , 412 u. s. 441 , 412 u. s. 452 ; stanley v. illinois, supra; and bell v. burson, 402 u. s. 535 . affirmed. [ footnote 1 ] section 5(b) of the act provides in part: "any household which includes a member who has reached his eighteenth birthday and who is claimed as a dependent child for federal income tax purposes ..... on the interpretation of the statute advanced by appellants, to persons who contend that they were not validly claimed as dependents. mr. justice blackmun, dissenting. section 5(b) of the food stamp act, which the court today holds unconstitutional, is not happily drafted. and surely is not the kind of statute that attracts sympathetic review. its purposes, however ..... remaining members of the household, that they may be completely destitute, and that they may be one or 10 or 20. ante at 413 u. s. 514 . section 3(e) of the food stamp act, 7 u.s.c. 2012(e), provides in relevant part: "the term 'household' shall mean a group of . . . individuals . . . who . . . are living as one .....

Khasbaba Maruti Sholke Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2474; (1973)2SCC449; [1974]1SCR266

..... /34 and 333/34 indian penal code, section 25 of arms act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 27 arms act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 3 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 4 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 5 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code and section 6 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code. in the alternative ..... , there were charges against the accused for the above offences read with section .....

Holtzman Vs. Schlesinger

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for military support of cambodia. [ footnote 5 ] the following winter, congress reenacted the same limitation with the added proviso that "nothing contained in this section shall be construed to prohibit support of actions required to insure the safe and orderly withdrawal or disengagement of u.s. forces from southeast asia, or ..... follow the regular appellate procedures on the accelerated schedule as suggested by the court of appeals. in my judgment, i would exceed my legal authority were i, acting alone, to grant this application. the application to vacate the stay entered below must therefore be denied. [ footnote 1 ] article i, 8, cl. 11 ..... constitution. [ footnote 1 ] the united states district court agreed and, on applicants' motion for summary judgment, permanently enjoined respondents, the secretary of defense, the acting secretary of the air force, and the deputy secretary of defense, from "participating in any way in military activities in or over cambodia or releasing any bombs which .....

The State of Punjab Vs. Jagir Singh, Baljit Singh and Karam Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2407; 1973CriLJ1589; (1974)3SCC277; [1974]1SCR328

..... and in mentioning a wrong place of occurrence. as would appear from the narration of facts, only members of one party received injuries as a result of the explosion of hand-grenade. if the hand-grenade had exploded in a large gathering near the village gurudwara, it is not likely that the splinters from the exploded hand- ..... received fatal injuries. injuries were also received by ajit singh, jarnail singh, mohinder singh and harbans singh fws. learned sessions judge convicted jagir singh and baljit singh under section 302 indian penal code on two counts for causing the death of joginder singh and lakha singh deceased and sentenced them to death on each count. the said two accused ..... of these witnesses more closely. if their evidence can stand that test, as it does in the present case, there is no reason why it should not be acted upon. some of the witnesses are close relatives of the deceased persons and it is most difficult to believe that they would spare the real assailants and falsely .....

Kanu Sanyal Vs. District Magistrate, Darjeeling and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2684; 1973CriLJ1818; (1973)2SCC674; [1974]1SCR621

..... when, but the earliest reported instance of it is to be found in the year 1784 (see wade's case reported in the note to blake's case 2 m. &. section 428 of issuing rule nisi in the first instance. if the applicant made out a prima facie case of unlawful detention, a rule nisi would issue to the respondent and ..... writ of habeas corpus : and it has accordingly been so argued at the bar', and held that the applicant was entitled to be discharged from confinement. similarly in exparte yarbrough (1884) 110 u.s. 651; 28 l.ed. 274. a writ of habeas corpus was prayed for on the ground that the applicant's trial, conviction and sentence in the ..... return being insufficient the court made the 'rule absolute to discharge the prisoner'. this practice found recognition in the crown office rules, 1886 which were made under the judicature act, 1875 to govern the practice and procedure on the crown side of the king's bench division. we need not refer to the specific provisions of the crown office rules .....

ChaIn Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2677; 1973CriLJ1810; (1974)3SCC406

..... . the appellant, his father karam singh, his uncle bawa singh and bawa singh's son charan singh were tried by the sessions judge, hoshiarpur for offences under sections 302, 307 and 324 read with section 34 i.p.c. in respect of the murder of one darshan singh on 12th october. 1967. the learned sessions judge acquitted karam singh and on appeal .....

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. the Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Wvg ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2734; 1973(0)KLT896(SC); (1973)2SCC713; [1974]1SCR671

..... of agrarian reform is essential, apart from taking over of janman rights, to make the law valid. in the present case a concrete agrarian project is presented by section 10 of the forest act. a substantially similar programme was considered by this court in kannan devan's : [1973]1scr356 . case and approved as sufficient to impart to the statute invulnerability ..... a scheme for agrarian reform and we do not see any good reason why we should take a different view with regard to the scheme envisaged in section 10 of the impugned act.36. the high court thought that the scheme was not real or genuine but illusory and has given some reasons in para 12 of the judgment ..... rights being an 'estate' are liable to be acquired by the state under article 31a(1)(a) as a necessary step to the implementation of agrarian reform. section 3 of the impugned act vests the ownership and possession of all private forests in the state. therefore they would attract the protection of article 31a(1). it would not be, in .....

Giani Bakshish Singh Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2667; 1973CriLJ1801; (1973)2SCC688; [1974]1SCR662; 1973(5)LC814(SC)

..... them to organise the movement in a systematic manner, raising volunteers and setting offices at suitable places in punjab. you further directed them to collect arms, explosives etc. for use for the achievement of the object at the proper time. you further instigated them to create hatred amongst hindus and sikhs and cause communal ..... makers in their wisdom have provided for it. it is not necessary to give further examples to show that prejudicial activities contemplated under section 3(1) of the maintenance of internal security act are not necessarily activities prohibited or made punishable by a specific provision of law. the cases relied upon to support the contrary proposition ..... detention is not a punishment for an offence. to accept the argument on behalf of the appellant would make the grounds given in section 3(1) of the maintenance of internal security act meaningless. take for instance action prejudicial to the relations of india with foreign powers. as far as we are aware, there is .....

Jalaja Shedthi and ors. Vs. Lakshmi Shedthi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2658; (1973)2SCC773; [1974]1SCR707

..... advocate submits that chandayya shetty had an interest in the properties which he could bequeath by will.8. it appears to us that the provisions of the madras act particularly section 36(2)(h) with its explanation without doubt indicates the time when a share of kavaru is ascertained or a partition in the family and whether property is ..... a share on that basis. the provision is also applicable to every kavaru possessing separate property as if it were a kutumba. however, under sub-section (3) of section 36 of that act if at the time of the partition any kavaru taking a share is a nissanthathi kavaru it would have only a life-interest in the property allotted ..... share as per the preliminary decree. therefore, the contention that interest obtained by the first defendant under the preliminary decree stood enlarged as a result of section 30(1) of the 'act' must fail.16. the above statement of the law which meets the several contentions raised before us is in consonance with our own reading of the .....