Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: us supreme court Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 102 results (0.093 seconds)

United Mine Workers Vs. Mcguire Shaft and Tunnel Corp.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in controversy, for appropriate relief, including an action for a declaratory judgment, writ of injunction ( subject to the limitations in section 211), and/or damages.' footnote 2 section 1 of the norris-laguardia act provides: 'that no court of the united states, as herein defined, shall have jurisdiction to issue any restraining order or ..... mere ghost to be driven hence by the slogan 'stabilization' and made a mockery by financial aggrandizement. footnotes footnote 1 that section provides: 'any person suffering legal wrong because of any act or practice arising out of this title, or any order or regulation issued pursuant thereto, may bring an action in a ..... growing out of a labor dispute, except in strict conformity with the provisions of this act; nor shall any such restraining order or temporary or permanent injunction be issued contrary to the public policy declared in this act.' section 4 specifies acts which may not be enjoined, including '[c] easing or refusing to perform any .....

United States Vs. Kras

Court : US Supreme Court

..... months." "b. upon the failure of a bankrupt . . . to pay any installment as ordered, the court may dismiss the proceeding for failure to pay costs as provided in section 59, sub. g. of the act. . . . " "c. no proceedings upon the discharge of a bankrupt . . . shall be instituted until the filing fees are paid in full." [ footnote 4 ] "any court ..... denied, 402 u.s. 966 (1971). pursuant to 28 u.s.c. 1252, the government appealed. we noted probable jurisdiction. 405 u.s. 915 (1972). i section 14 (b)(2) of the bankruptcy act, 11 u.s.c. 32(b)(2), provides that, upon the expiration of the time fixed by the court for filing of objections, "the court shall discharge ..... bankruptcy and states that, "in the case of a dismissal for failure to pay the costs," notice to creditors shall not be required. three separate sections of the page 409 u. s. 436 act thus contemplate the imposition of fees and condition a discharge upon payment of those fees. three charges are imposed: $37 for the referee's salary .....

Shri Janki Prasad Parimoo and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC930; 1973LabIC565; (1973)1SCC420; [1973]3SCR236

..... by following the appropriate procedure laid down by the constitution.27. in identifying backward classes, therefore, one has to guard oneself against including therein sections which are socially and educationally advanced because the whole object of reservation would otherwise be frustrated. in this connection it must also be remembered ..... scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, and that the provision made is for their advancement. reservation may be adopted to advance the interests of weaker sections of society, but in doing so, care must be taken to see that deserving and qualified candidates are not excluded from admission to higher ..... february 3,1969. this committee made its report in november. 1969 recommending several classes of citizens who deserved to be described as socially and educationally backward. acting substantially on the recommendations of the committee the state government issued on april 18, 1970 the jammu & kashmir scheduled castes and backward classes (reservation rules .....

District of Columbia Vs. Carter

Court : US Supreme Court

..... connection in which the words are used as reasonably to warrant the conclusion that they were employed . . . with different intent." ibid. section 1982, which first entered our jurisprudence as 1 of the civil rights act of 1866, act of apr. 9, 1866, 14 stat. 27, provides: "all citizens of the united states shall have the same right, in every ..... u. s. 546 (1962); see also e. pomeroy, the territories and the united states 1861-1890, p. 92 (1947); h.r.rep. no. 440, 48th cong., 1st sess. (1884); s.rep. no. 1249, 49th cong., 1st sess. (1886). thus, although the constitution vested control over the territories in the congress, its practical control was both "confused and ineffective," [ ..... but insofar as the judgment of the court of appeals sustaining respondent's claims rested on 1983, that judgment must be, and is, reversed. [ footnote 1 ] ku klux klan act of 1871, act of apr. 20, 1871, 1, 17 stat. 13, rev.stat. 1979, 42 u.s.c. 1983. [ footnote 2 ] officer carlson was never found for service of .....

Bronston Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... at the meeting and "shall examine the debtor or cause him to be examined and hear witnesses on any matter relevant to the proceeding." section 21(a) of the act, 11 u.s.c. 44(a), is applicable to a chapter xi proceeding because it is a provision of chapters i through vii "not inconsistent with or ..... law, be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. this section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the united states." [ footnote 2 ] under 334 of the bankruptcy act, 11 u.s.c. 734, the court must hold a first meeting of creditors within a limited period of ..... time after the chapter xi petition is filed. section 336, 11 u.s.c. 736, provides that the judge or court-appointed referee shall preside .....

Hughes Tool Co. Vs. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... transaction "which would result in creating a monopoly or monopolies and thereby restrain competition or jeopardize another air carrier" not a party to the transaction. section 102 of the act requires that, in assessing the public interest and the public convenience and necessity, the board should consider, among other things, "[c]ompetition to the ..... with our duty "to make the [regulatory scheme] work." silver v. new york stock exchange, 373 u.s. at 373 u. s. 357 . section 408 of the act has now been amended to require board approval when any person, whether or not engaged in any aspect of aeronautics, acquires a controlling interest in an air ..... of that control to determine how the air carrier acquires aircraft and the necessary financing therefor immunized from the operation of the antitrust laws under section 414 of the federal aviation act?" [ footnote 2/10 ] it is not unreasonable to assume that the battalions of lawyers for these adversaries devoted substantially the same effort and .....

Goosby Vs. Osser

Court : US Supreme Court

..... is heard and determined by a district court of three judges under section 2284 of this title." [ footnote 2 ] pa.stat.ann., tit. 25, 623-1 et seq. (1963 and supp. 1972-1973); 2602(w)(12)(supp. 1972- ..... 28 u.s.c. 2281. the judgment of the court of appeals is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded with direction to enter an appropriate order pursuant to that section for the convening of a three-judge court to hear and determine the merits of petitioners' constitutional claims, see kennedy v. mendoza-martinez, 372 u. s. 144 , 372 ..... restraining the action of any officer of such state in the enforcement or execution of such statute or of an order made by an administrative board or commission acting under state statutes, shall not be granted by any district court or judge thereof upon the ground of the unconstitutionality of such statute unless the application therefor .....

Roe Vs. Wade

Court : US Supreme Court

..... other medical procedure, the judicial council becomes involved whenever there is alleged violation of the principles of medical ethics as established by the house of delegates." [ footnote 40 ] " uniform abortion act" "section 1. [ abortion defined; when authorized. ]" "(a) 'abortion' means the termination of human pregnancy with an intention other than to produce a live birth or to remove a dead fetus." "(b ..... construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform the law with respect to the subject of this act among those states which enact it." "section 4. [ short title. ] this act may be cited as the uniform abortion act." "section 5. [ severability. ] if any provision of this act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other .....

United States Vs. Dionisio

Court : US Supreme Court

..... determination that "(a) there is probable cause for belief that an individual is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a particular offense enumerated in section 2516 of this chapter [including the transmission of wagering information];" "(b) there is probable cause for belief that particular communications concerning that offense will be obtained ..... no civilian may be brought to trial for an infamous crime "unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury." this constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body "acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge," stirone v. united states, 361 u. s. 212 , 361 u. s. 218 , whose mission is to clear ..... (schwartz), supra, at 899-900. a grand jury has broad investigative powers to determine whether a crime has been committed and who has committed it. the jurors may act on tips, rumors, evidence offered by the prosecutor, or their own personal knowledge. branzburg v. hayes, 408 u.s. at 408 u. s. 701 . no .....

United States Vs. Glaxo Group Ltd.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... third parties without the licensors' prior consent. the united states filed a civil antitrust suit against appellees to restrain alleged violations of 1 of the sherman act, and the government also attacked the validity of the dosage-form patents, and sought the relief of mandatory, nondiscriminatory bulk-form sales and reasonable-royalty ..... authority for the existence of a general right of either private individuals or the government to collaterally challenge the validity of issued patents. in the patent act of 1790, congress provided that private citizens could, upon motion alleging fraudulent procurement, prompt a district court to issue to a patentee an order to ..... defense to the government's claim of antitrust violations. it reasoned that, in a suit to vindicate the public interest by enjoining violations of the sherman act, the united states should have the opportunity, similar to that afforded licensees in an action for royalties, to show that an asserted shield of patentability does .....