Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 1973 Page 1 of about 145 results (0.369 seconds)

Sambhu Nath Sarkar Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1425; (1973)1SCC856; [1974]1SCR1

..... commit, any offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term extending to seven years or more or any offence under the arms act, 1959 or the explosive substances act, 1908, where the commission of such offence disturbs, or is likely to disturb, public order; or(e) in the case of a person referred to ..... where a foreigner enters or attempts to enter india or is found with arms, ammunition or explosives, or where a foreigner enters or attempts to enter a notified area or is found therein in breach of section 3 of the criminal law amendment act, 1961, or where such a foreigner enters or attempts to enter in an area adjoining the ..... in clauses (a) to (f) of section 110 of the crpc, 1898, committing any offence punishable with imprisonment where the commission of such offence disturbs, or is likely to .....

Khasbaba Maruti Sholke Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2474; (1973)2SCC449; [1974]1SCR266

..... /34 and 333/34 indian penal code, section 25 of arms act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 27 arms act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 3 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 4 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code, section 5 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code and section 6 explosive substances act read with section 34 indian penal code. in the alternative ..... , there were charges against the accused for the above offences read with section .....

Giani Bakshish Singh Vs. Government of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2667; 1973CriLJ1801; (1973)2SCC688; [1974]1SCR662; 1973(5)LC814(SC)

..... them to organise the movement in a systematic manner, raising volunteers and setting offices at suitable places in punjab. you further directed them to collect arms, explosives etc. for use for the achievement of the object at the proper time. you further instigated them to create hatred amongst hindus and sikhs and cause communal ..... makers in their wisdom have provided for it. it is not necessary to give further examples to show that prejudicial activities contemplated under section 3(1) of the maintenance of internal security act are not necessarily activities prohibited or made punishable by a specific provision of law. the cases relied upon to support the contrary proposition ..... detention is not a punishment for an offence. to accept the argument on behalf of the appellant would make the grounds given in section 3(1) of the maintenance of internal security act meaningless. take for instance action prejudicial to the relations of india with foreign powers. as far as we are aware, there is .....

Pilani Investment Corporation Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1030; [1973]89ITR53(SC); (1973)3SCC571; [1973]3SCR206; 1973(5)LC580(SC)

..... the assessee's contention that it was a public limited company in which the public was substantially interested and its share were freely transferable. the provisions of section 23a of the act were held to have been wrongly invoked. the order of the income tax officer in this respect was consequently set aside. the question reproduced above was ..... co. was produced before the tribunal. the appellate assistant commissioner had by that order set aside the order of income tax officer and had held that section 23a of the act did not apply to ppi co. the tribunal observed that both jc mills and ppi co. were public companies in which the public were substantially interested ..... the income tax officer, came to less than 25 per cent of the total shareholding, the assessee company was held to fall within the purview of section 23a of the act. the income tax officer also referred to article 33 of the memorandum and articles of association of that assessee company, according to which the directors could .....

E. Venkateswara Rao Naidu Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC698; (1973)1SCC361; [1973]3SCR216

..... of those services is being undertaken in consultation with the state governments'. we see no merit in the contention. article 309 provides that subject to the provisions of the constitution, acts of the appropriate legislature may regulate the recruitment and conditions of service of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the union or of ..... recruitment and conditions of servants appointed to such service, and posts until provision in that behalf is made under an act of the appropriate legislature. the rules so made by the president are effective subject to the provisions of any such act. paragraph 2 of the office memorandum in terms recites that 'the president is pleased to direct that the age of .....

Shri Janki Prasad Parimoo and ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC930; 1973LabIC565; (1973)1SCC420; [1973]3SCR236

..... by following the appropriate procedure laid down by the constitution.27. in identifying backward classes, therefore, one has to guard oneself against including therein sections which are socially and educationally advanced because the whole object of reservation would otherwise be frustrated. in this connection it must also be remembered ..... scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, and that the provision made is for their advancement. reservation may be adopted to advance the interests of weaker sections of society, but in doing so, care must be taken to see that deserving and qualified candidates are not excluded from admission to higher ..... february 3,1969. this committee made its report in november. 1969 recommending several classes of citizens who deserved to be described as socially and educationally backward. acting substantially on the recommendations of the committee the state government issued on april 18, 1970 the jammu & kashmir scheduled castes and backward classes (reservation rules .....

District of Columbia Vs. Carter

Court : US Supreme Court

..... connection in which the words are used as reasonably to warrant the conclusion that they were employed . . . with different intent." ibid. section 1982, which first entered our jurisprudence as 1 of the civil rights act of 1866, act of apr. 9, 1866, 14 stat. 27, provides: "all citizens of the united states shall have the same right, in every ..... u. s. 546 (1962); see also e. pomeroy, the territories and the united states 1861-1890, p. 92 (1947); h.r.rep. no. 440, 48th cong., 1st sess. (1884); s.rep. no. 1249, 49th cong., 1st sess. (1886). thus, although the constitution vested control over the territories in the congress, its practical control was both "confused and ineffective," [ ..... but insofar as the judgment of the court of appeals sustaining respondent's claims rested on 1983, that judgment must be, and is, reversed. [ footnote 1 ] ku klux klan act of 1871, act of apr. 20, 1871, 1, 17 stat. 13, rev.stat. 1979, 42 u.s.c. 1983. [ footnote 2 ] officer carlson was never found for service of .....

Masood Alam Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC897; 1973CriLJ627; (1973)1SCC551; [1973]3SCR268

..... as far back as october, 1967 in 5. azeez basha v. union of india : [1968]1scr833 . these activities clearly bring the petitioner's case within section 3 of the act, being calculated to incite communal violence.20. it has then been contended that some of the grounds of detention conveyed to the petitioner are vague and, therefore ..... effective. if the detaining authority is of opinion on grounds which are germane and relevant, that it is necessary to detain a person from acting prejudicially as contemplated by section 3 of the act then it is not for this court to consider objectively how imminent is the likelihood of the detenu indulging in these activities. this submission ..... meet the situation which might result therefrom....5. the government, it appears, did not accord its approval of the petitioner's detention as required by section 3(3) of the act. according to para 22 of the writ petition, the contents of which are not controverted, as expressly stated in para 12 of the counter affidavit, .....

State of U.P. Vs. Iftikhar Khan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC863; 1973CriLJ636; (1973)1SCC512; [1973]3SCR328

..... 31. as pointed out by the judicial committee in mahbub shah v. king-emperor [1945] l.r. 72 indap 148, to invoke the aid of section 34 ipc it must be shown that the criminal act complained against, was done by any one of the accused persons in the furtherance of the common intention of all. if this is shown, anyone of ..... 3 and 4 at the time when sikander khan was shot at. it is not necessary, to attract section 34, that any overt act must be done by the particular accused. the section will be attracted if it is established that the criminal act has been done by anyone of the accused persons in furtherance of the common intention. if this is shown ..... is to be found in the existence of a common intention animating the offenders leading to the doing of a criminal act in furtherance of the common intention and presence of the offender sought to be rendered liable under section 34 is not, on the words of the statute, one of the conditions of its applicability.' as explained by lord sumner .....

State of U.P. Vs. Paras Nath Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC1073; 1973CriLJ850; (1973)3SCC647; [1973]3SCR313

..... if they so liked. on this application the counsel for the accused persons recorded a note opposing the suggestion and describing the allegation against the witnesses as baseless. section 540, cr. p.c., according to the defence counsel was inapplicable and he also declined to examine these witnesses in defence. the said witnesses were in these ..... the matter our anxious thought even though we hold that we find nothing improbable in the statements of these two eye-witnesses, we think it proper not to act on the uncorroborated testimony of these witnesses. we, there- fore, by the way of abundant caution give the appellants the benefit of the doubt. with these ..... son respectively of the deceased suresh singh and are in a sense chance witnesses. it is true that under the law there is nothing which prevents us from acting upon the testimony of these two eyewitnesses and upholding the conviction of the appellants, but rules of prudence and safety have to be taken into consideration. therefore .....