Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Year: 2006 Page 9 of about 239 results (0.059 seconds)

Leelavathi @ Leelamma and anr. Vs. Chandra Mouli and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2007KAR2338; ILR2007(2)Kar2338; 2007(4)KCCRSN217(DB)

..... where an application is erroneously rejected the insurer can challenge only that part of the order while filing appeal on ground specified in sub-section (2) of section l49 of the l988 act. but such application for permission has to be bona fide and filed at the stage when the insured is required to lead his evidence ..... ilr1990kar4300 and the decision in the case of uttam kumar v. madhav and anr : ilr2002kar1864 . our attention was drawn to the provisions of section 306 of the indian succession act, 1925 (central act no. 39 of 1925). placing reliance on both these decisions, the learned counsel assertively canvassed that the claimants could not have continued to prosecute ..... that were available to the owner-insured and hence, the grounds to oppose the claim stood enlarged and were not affected by the mischief of section 149(2) of the act. consequently when the award has been passed after such permission was granted to the insurance company, the insurance company is entitled to maintain appeal .....

H.S. Chetan (Since Deceased by His Lrs. Leelavathi @ Leelamma W/O. K. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2008ACJ191; 2007(6)KarLJ381; 2007(4)AIRKarR192; AIR2007NOC1642(DB).

..... the decision in the case of uttam kumar v. madhav and anr. reported in : ilr2002kar1864 . our attention was drawn to the provisions of section 306 of the indian succession act, 1925 (central act no. 39 of 1925), placing reliance on both these decisions, the learned counsel assertively canvassed that the claimants could not have continued to prosecute the ..... that were available to the owner-insured and hence, the grounds to oppose the claim stood enlarged and were not affected by the mischief of section 149(2) of the act. consequently when the award has been passed after such permission was granted to the insurance company, the insurance company is entitled to maintain appeal against ..... the sides to lead evidence in support of their claim. the insurer was permitted to obtain prior permission to contest the claim as required under section 170 of the act. the tribunal during fresh inquiry, received evidence as offered by the parties and passed award on 7.10.2005 granting to the claimants in all .....

The Branch Manager, the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Rep. by the Deput ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007ACJ1858; 2007(3)KarLJ305; 2007(1)Kar720; 2007(3)KLJ305; 2007(2)KCCR924; 2007(2)AIRKarR246; 2007(3)CivilLJ624(DB).

..... iii the tribunal has considered those applications on 25.04.2004 and records as follows:25.04.2004 sri ssa and sri mmb filed applications under section 170m.v. act. resp 2 & 5 and their counsel abs.--thus petitions filed for inscorpns are allowed18. thus, the tribunal has allowed those applications by its ..... point it is necessary to observe that invariably motor accident claims tribunals are ignoring the requirement of passing considered orders under the provisions of section 170 of the act and such applications are disposed of by cryptic orders without taking into consideration existence or otherwise the circumstances enumerated under clause (a) and ..... insurers, there is no element of collusion between them and the claimants manifesting from their conduct. therefore, circumstances enumerated in clause (a) of section 170 of the act, are non existent. for this reason the tribunal could not have impleaded respective insurance companies (appellants) or permitted them to contest the claim .....

Dr. Vijayalakshmi Basavaraj Working as Deputy Director (Technical), Al ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of the indian institute of speech and hearing. the composition indicates that it is dominated by the union cabinet minister of health & family welfare, who acts as the chairman, the secretary of the very ministry or his nominee, the directorate general of health services, government of india or his nominee, additional secretary ..... of another notification as at annexure-a even without finalising the applications received pursuant to notification at annexure-b is an arbitrary, capricious and malafide act; that it amounts to violation of constitutional guarantee under article 16 of the constitution of india; that when the selection process under the notification at ..... very post, while the applications called for and received earlier and processed pursuant to the earlier notification having not been finalised, is illegal, a biased act on the part of the respondents; that the subsequent notification inviting applications is not valid in law; that the respondents are bound to finalise the .....

Sri K. Ramachandra Rao S/O Late K. Venkatanarayana Rao Vs. Sri K.G. Ra ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2006Kant247; ILR2006KAR2561; 2006(5)KarLJ273

..... record to show that the said amount which is paid as security deposit is not refundable. it is clear from the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 41 of the act that the sub-section is not attracted for payment of court fee on security deposit which is refundable.11. the full bench of this court in the case ..... fee.7. before appreciating the controversy in question, a reference will have to be made to the provisions of section 41 of the act. section 41 of the act would relate to the suits between landlord and tenant. sub-section (1) of section 41 would relate to the suits between the landlord and tenant in civil courts wherein the court fee will have ..... . the facts relating to the other writ petitions are almost identical. they have also instituted a suit for possession and court fee has been paid under section 41(2) of the act. in those petitions also the learned trial judge has directed the petitioner to pay court fee on the security deposit received by the plaintiffs. consequently they .....

Agricultural Produce Market Committee Vs. the Weighmen's Association a ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR3320; (2006)IIILLJ454Kant

..... out in apmc, bangalore, therefore, the said judgment is of no assistance.19. in this context it is also necessary to look into the definition of employee contained in the act. section 2(i) defines 'employee' as under;2(i) 'employee' means any person who is employed for hire or reward to do any work, skilled or unskilled, manual or ..... employed for hire or reward, to do any work, by the apmc. therefore, as the weighman do not satisfy the definition of employee as contained in section 2(1) of the act, the act is not applicable to the weighman. therefore, seen from any angle having regard to the material on record, the law declared by this court in the ..... wages by the market committee as they are not employed by them. they also contend that the apmc is not a schedule employment as defined under section 12 of the act. therefore, the act itself is not applicable to these applicants and sought for dismissal of the said application.2. both the parties adduced evidence, produced documents, relied on .....

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, represented by Its Secretar ...

Court : Karnataka

..... in apmc, bangalore. therefore, the said judgment is of no assistance.19. in this context it is also necessary to look into the definition of employee contained in the act. section 2(i) defines 'employee' as under:employee' means any person who is employed for hire or reward to do any work, skilled or unskilled, manual or clerical, in ..... for hire or reward, to do any work, by the apmc. therefore, as the weighman do not satisfy the definition of employee as contained in section 2(i) of the act, the act is not applicable to the weighman. therefore, seen from any angle having regard to the material on record, the law declared by this court in the ..... wages by the market committee as they are not employed by them. they also contend that the apmc is not a schedule employment as defined under section 12 of the act. therefore, the act itself is not applicable to these applicants and sought for dismissal of the said application.2. both the parties adduced evidence, produced documents, relied on .....

Shri K. Sippe Gowda S/o late Chikka Javaregowda (under orders of dismi ...

Court : Karnataka

..... amplitude. the word 'appointment' in article 229(1) is to be construed according to the axiom that the greater includes the less. this cardinal canon of interpretation underlies section 16 of the general clauses act which has been made applicable by article 317(1) of the constitution. construed in the light of this juristic principle, the power of 'appointment' conferred by article ..... , or the governor of a state. they shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of their office or for any act done or purporting to be done by them in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties. the proviso to the said article makes it clear that nothing in .....

K. Sippe Gowda Vs. the High Court of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... amplitude. the word 'appointment' in article 229(1) is to be construed according to the axiom that the greater includes the less. this cardinal canon of interpretation underlies section 16 of the general clauses act which has been made applicable by article 317(1) of the constitution. construed in the light of this juristic principle, the power of 'appointment' conferred by article ..... , or the governor of a state. they shall not be answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties of their office or for any act done or purporting to be done by them in the exercise and performance of those powers and duties. the proviso to the said article makes it clear that nothing in .....

The General Manager, Yellamma Cotton Woolen and Silk Mills Vs. Regiona ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR194; 2006(4)KarLJ265; (2007)IIILLJ278Kant

..... 2001 (91) flr (4)-44 -- 689 to support the contention that the words 'apprentice' and 'trainee' are not similar or identical. under the payment of gratuity act, section 2(e) provides that all employees are entitled to gratuity except apprentices - therefore the exclusion ought not to be extended to 'trainees' when the legislature has not specifically ..... by the concerned respondents in approaching the authority belatedly and hence the application was not maintainable.7. it is stated that a combined reading of section 2a of the act read with 13(g) of the certified standing orders, would require that absence from duty be treated as break in service and would result in ..... hotel highway limited, mysore 1999-iii-llj (supp) kar. 243: a division bench of this court has held that for purposes of section 2(f) of the employees provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952, a person only receiving training, cannot be called an employee.in lalappa lingappa and ors. v. laxnu vishnu textile mills, .....