Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Year: 2006 Page 7 of about 239 results (0.182 seconds)

Sharifa B.T. Mohamed Ali Jinnaha D/O Mohamed Ali Jinnah Vs. the Vice C ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR2220; 2006(3)KarLJ501

..... paid by the petitioner. due to abandonment of her course at the middle of the academic year the said seat has become vacant, as per the medical council of india act and regulation of university they are not entitled to fill up the said seat aa rightly pointed out in the brochure issued by the first respondent university under condition no ..... for the second mid third year to the petitioner. she further sought a direction to direct respondent no. 4 to take action against respondents 1, 2 and 3 for having acted contrary to law.2. the grievance made out by the petitioner in the instant writ petition is that she was admitted to the first year mbbs course at the 3rd ..... that the petitioner is not entitled for refund of tuition fee on the ground that there is no provision to fill up the vacant seat under the university act or medical council of india act. the seat cannot be filled up till the course is completed for the academic year commencing from 2000-2001. the fees for this course under the nri .....

Manasa Housing Co-operative Society Ltd. by Its Secretary, Sri P.S. Su ...

Court : Karnataka

..... not otherwise. by mere filing of suit for specific performance of the contract or the decree by itself does not amount to violation of section 80 of the act. apart from this, section 83 contemplates an enquiry regarding illegal transaction which reads as under:83. inquiry regarding illegal transactions.the prescribed authority shall, after a summary inquiry ..... appeal or in the suit. he also pointed out that the grant of decree for specific performance of contract does not attract the provisions of section 79b or section 80 of the act. in this regard, he also referred to another decision reported in : ilr1992kar717 in the case of yogambika v. narsingh and pointed out that ..... the same. in this case undisputedly, the question raised by the learned counsel for the respondents requires to be decided only by the authority prescribed under section 83 of the act. in the similar circumstances, the apex court in a judgment reported in air 1986 sc 1912 in the case of rojasara ramjibhai dahyabhai v. jani .....

Ramachandra Pesticides (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Karnataka

..... of the assessee only on the ground that it has no power to waive the penalty. in our view, the said approach of the tribunal is contrary to sub-section (3) of the act.12. in the light of what is stated above, the questions referred for our opinion and decision are answered in the affirmative i.e., in favour of the ..... assessee had no explanation to offer and proceeded to levy penalty of rs. 12,360 under section 140a(3) of the act. in appeal, the cit(a) confirmed the levy of penalty. the assessee preferred a second appeal to the tribunal. before the tribunal, a copy of the explanation offered ..... advance tax on due dates. however, the balance of rs. 51,531 had not been paid within one month of filing of the return of income as required under section 140a of the act. the ao issued a show-cause notice on 27th march, 1986 and on 29th dec, 1987 to which there was no response. therefore, the ao held that the .....

Ramachandra Pesticides P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Karnataka

..... of the assessee only on the ground that it has no power to waive the penalty. in our view, the said approach of the tribunal is contrary to sub-section (3) of the act.15. in the light of what is stated above, the questions referred for our opinion and decision are answered in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of ..... held that the assessee had no explanation to offer and proceeded to levy penalty of rs. 12,360 under section 140a(3) of the act. in appeal, the commissioner of income-tax (appeals) confirmed the levy of penalty. the assessee preferred a second appeal to the tribunal. before the tribunal, a copy ..... tax on the due dates. however, the balance of rs. 51,531 had not been paid within one month of filing of the return of income as required under section 140a of the act. the assessing officer issued a show-cause notice on march 27, 1986, and on december 29, 1987, to which there was no response. therefore, the assessing officer .....

Ramchandra Pesticides (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2006)204CTR(Kar)133; [2006]285ITR45(KAR); [2006]285ITR45(Karn); [2006]155TAXMAN111(Kar)

..... of the assessee only on the ground that it has no power to waive the penalty. in our view, the said approach of the tribunal is contrary to sub-section (3) of the act.15. in the light of what is stated above, the questions referred for our opinion and decision are answered in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the ..... that the assessee had no explanation to offer and proceeded to levy penalty of rs. 12,360 under section 140a(3) of the act. in appeal, the commissioner (appeals) confirmed the levy of penalty. the assessee preferred a second appeal to the tribunal. before the tribunal, a copy of the explanation ..... tax on the due dates. however, the balance of rs. 51,531 had not been paid within one month of filing of the return of income as required under section 140a of the act. the assessing officer issued a show-cause notice on 27-3-1986, and on 29-12-1987, to which there was no response. therefore, the assessing officer held .....

The State by the Psi of Bhatkal Town Police Station Vs. Karim M. S/O M ...

Court : Karnataka

..... , therefore the prosecution has successfully proved the guilt of possession of the country bombs by all the accused persons. the accused are convicted under section 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 r/w section 34 ipc. the accused are sentenced to r.i. for a period of two years each and to pay a fine of rs. 20,000/- each in default to ..... investigation, the charge sheet is filed. the trial court finds that there were five inmates and only 3 bombs were found hence comes to the conclusion that conscious possession of explosives by the accused is not proved and acquitted them.4. the evidence of p.w.1 the panch witness and the evidence of pws. 2 to 5 who were the ..... k. sreedhar rao, j.1. a.1 to a.5 were charged for offence under section 5 of the explosive substances act 1908. the facts of the prosecution disclose that on 10-11-1997 at 7-30 p.m. a1 is the driver of the jeep bearing no. kl-11/c-5925, .....

Hanamappa Ramappa Khajagal Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... ruled on the facts of that case that respondent 2 therein cannot be called a tenant in terms of section 2(a)(34) and that the lands were not tenanted within the meaning of section 44 of the act. the said case is factually distinguishable and it would not apply to the facts of this case. the tribunal ..... been defined so also 'agricultural labourer' in the act. 'tenant' has been defined to mean an agriculturist who cultivates personally the land he ..... show that the said act has been enacted to have uniform law relating to agrarian. confirmation of ownership on tenant, ceiling of land holding and for certain other matters. interpretation has to be in favour of the weaker sections of the society which would achieve the object in terms of the intentment of the legislation. 'agriculture' has .....

A. Hanumantha Reddy and ors. Vs. the Additional Registrar of Cooperati ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ548

..... while fixing their pay scales in the cadre of law officers, petitioners approached the first respondent-the additional register of cooperative societies by raising a dispute under section 70 of the karnataka cooperative societies act, 1959, in dispute no. dds d2/1110/97-98. the first respondent, by his award dated 21.07.1999 rejected the claim of the petitioners. aggrieved by ..... the allowance which may be varying depending upon the different allowances granted to the employee. this is also the scheme of payment of gratuity provided under the payment of gratuity act, 1972 whereunder the word 'wage' has been defined to mean 'all emoluments which are earned by an employee while on duty including dearness allowances.10. the subsidiary rules of the .....

Novo Nordisk India Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(4)KarLJ363

..... sidha) or unani (tibb) systems of medicines;(ii) any medicine included in the homeopathic system of medicine; and(iii) any substance to which the provisions of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 c23 of 1940) do not apply;as could be seen from the definition of 'formation', an 'imported formulation' is not excluded from it if it otherwise falls within the .....

Abdul Gaffar Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR2353; [2006]285ITR203(KAR); [2006]285ITR203(Karn)

..... the 3rd respondent-tribunal, bangalore bench, bangalore, vide annex. 'k' to the writ petition. he also prayed this court to declare that the provisions of section 54f of the it act, 1961 ('the act' for short), as they stood in the year 2000-01 as ultra vires to the constitution of india.2. the orders annexs. d and e have ..... , inasmuch as, it is definitive in character.the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that in subsequent years exemption under section 54f of the act was extended to two residential houses and therefore, depriving during the asst. yr. 2000-01 of such an exemption by extending it. to one residential house ..... a second dwelling house in that premises out of the sale proceeds derived from the sale of second site would disentitle the assessee from claiming relief under section 54f of the act. the policy of permitting exemption in respect of one dwelling house is vested in the central government. this policy legislated cannot be said to be vague .....