Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: (1) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.7/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (2) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.18/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (3) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.19/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (4) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.20/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (5) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.21/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (6) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.22/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara Date of Order :: 19th December, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Vikas Balia ) Mr.Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: (1) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.7/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (2) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.18/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (3) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.19/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (4) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.20/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (5) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.21/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara (6) S.B.CIVIL (VAT) REVISION PETITION NO.22/2012 A Infrastructure Ltd., Bhilwara versus Commercial Taxes Officer, Special Circle, Bhilwara Date of Order :: 19th December, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Vikas Balia ) Mr.Pa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
DBSAW No.116/2008 With two connected matters 1 60 to 62 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :::: JUDGMENT1 D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.116/2008 Narendra Kumar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.2. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.41/2008 Subey Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.3. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.42/2008 Bharat Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT:13. h January 2014. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. MATHUR Mr. B.L. Maheshwari, Sr. Advocate with ]. Mr. Thana Ram ]. Mr. Manish Shishodia ]. Mr. S.P. Arora, ]. Mr. M.A. Siddiqui for Dr. Pratistha Dave ]., for the respective parties. BY THE COURT: (Per Dinesh Maheshwari,J.) These 3 intra-court appeals (SAW Nos.116/2008, 41/2008 and 42/2008), filed respectively by the writ petitioner and by the respondents Nos.5 and 4 of CWP No.5646/2005 against the same order dated 21.01.2008, have been considered together; and are taken up for disposal by this common judgment. After having...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
DBSAW No.116/2008 With two connected matters 1 60 to 62 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :::: JUDGMENT1 D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.116/2008 Narendra Kumar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.2. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.41/2008 Subey Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.3. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.42/2008 Bharat Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT:13. h January 2014. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. MATHUR Mr. B.L. Maheshwari, Sr. Advocate with ]. Mr. Thana Ram ]. Mr. Manish Shishodia ]. Mr. S.P. Arora, ]. Mr. M.A. Siddiqui for Dr. Pratistha Dave ]., for the respective parties. BY THE COURT: (Per Dinesh Maheshwari,J.) These 3 intra-court appeals (SAW Nos.116/2008, 41/2008 and 42/2008), filed respectively by the writ petitioner and by the respondents Nos.5 and 4 of CWP No.5646/2005 against the same order dated 21.01.2008, have been considered together; and are taken up for disposal by this common judgment. After having...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
DBSAW No.116/2008 With two connected matters 1 60 to 62 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :::: JUDGMENT1 D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.116/2008 Narendra Kumar Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.2. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.41/2008 Subey Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.3. D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W) No.42/2008 Bharat Singh Vs. State of Raj. & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT:13. h January 2014. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. MATHUR Mr. B.L. Maheshwari, Sr. Advocate with ]. Mr. Thana Ram ]. Mr. Manish Shishodia ]. Mr. S.P. Arora, ]. Mr. M.A. Siddiqui for Dr. Pratistha Dave ]., for the respective parties. BY THE COURT: (Per Dinesh Maheshwari,J.) These 3 intra-court appeals (SAW Nos.116/2008, 41/2008 and 42/2008), filed respectively by the writ petitioner and by the respondents Nos.5 and 4 of CWP No.5646/2005 against the same order dated 21.01.2008, have been considered together; and are taken up for disposal by this common judgment. After having...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B. CIVIL FIRST APPEAL NO.152/2013 Smt. Saroj & Ors. Vs. Prabhu Narain Mathur & Anr. Date of Judgment ::07. h February, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. H.R. Soni, for the appellants. Mr. M.D. Boob ) Mr. Mahesh Joshi ), for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: REPORTABLE This appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 22.01.2013 passed by Additional District Judge No.1, Jodhpur Metropolitan, Jodhpur, whereby, the suit filed by the plaintiffs for partition and permanent injunction has been dismissed and order dated 22.02.2013 passed by said Court, whereby, the judgment dated 22.01.2013 was reviewed and the counter claim filed by the defendant No.1 for possession, which was originally dismissed, has been decreed. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the appellants- plaintiffs filed a suit, inter alia, with the averments that they are legal representatives of late Kailash Narayan Mathur (K...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.218/2013 Smt. Radha Devi versus Lekh Ram & ORS.Date of Judgment :: 24th July, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.R.S.Choudhary, for the appellant. Mr.Suresh Shrimali, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This second appeal under Section 100 CPC is directed against judgment and decree dated 19.11.2013 passed by Additional District Judge No.2, Nohar, District Hanumangarh, whereby, the appeal preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 09.05.2006 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division).Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh was upheld. The facts in brief may be noticed thus: the appellant- plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract dated 10.08.1990 on 14.08.2003 with the averments that defendant Lekh Ram for fulfilling family requirements required money and, therefore, after receiving a sum of Rs.25,000/- in cash from the plaintiff executed agreem...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER D.B.Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.6176/2014 (Mahaveer Bishnoi v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) Date of Order :: 1st July, 2015 P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA Mr.Deepak Bishnoi, for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Ladrecha, Additional Advocate General, for respondent State. Mr.G.R.Punia, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr.N.R.Choudhary, for the applicants...BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE GOVIND MATHUR,J.) The President, Legal Cell of Vishnoi Mahasabha Van Evam Vanya Jeev Raksha Samiti. has preferred this petition for writ with a prayer to restrain the respondents from organising 'Tonga Race' from village Mundiad to Kharnal and from Kharnal to Nagaur on the occasion of 'Ganeshji Ka Mela' and 'Veer Tejaji Ka Mela'. As per the petitioner in light of the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1960') the race so organised is a cr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRL. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 7770/2012 Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya Vs. State of Raj. Date of order :15. h December, 2012 HON'BLE SHRI SANDEEP MEHTA, J.Mr. N.K.Bohra, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Joshi,P.P. REPORTABLE Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by the petitioner Rajesh Purohit @ Bholiya s/o Late Rameshchandra Goriya who has been arrested in C.R. No. 59/2012 registered at Police Station Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur for the offences under Sections 274, 275, 276, 420, 120-B I.P.C. and 103, 104 Trade Mark Act and Section 17-B & 27 Drugs & Cosmetics Act. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that the S.H.O. P.S. Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur as well as the Drug Control Officer, Jodhpur received a source information regarding the 2 transaction of spurious Mero-CD, Merosul(Meropenam) injections. T...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: Kesari Chand Sethia Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8359/2010) DATE OF ORDER : August 2nd, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS ____________________________________ Mr. C.S. Kotwani for the petitioner. Mr. K.K. Bissa, Govt. Counsel. Mr. I.S. Pareek, Addl. Govt. Counsel. BY THE COURT : Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who was working on the post of Junior Accountant in the office of the Project Director, Agriculture & Land Survey Department, Bikaner to challenge the order of prosecution sanction passed against him dated 01.07.2006 (Annex.-6), so also, the suspension order dated 02.07.2010 (Annex.-8). Brief facts of the case are that on 07.06.2005, an 2 FIR was lodged against three persons namely, Vijay Singh Nahta, Pratap Singh Rao and Nakhta Ram at CPS ACB Jaipur bearing No.120/2005 under Section 13(1)(d)(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and S...
Tag this Judgment!