Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
-1- DB Civil Misc. Appeal No.359/2013 Guru Vikas Sharma v. Shweta (Priya) Date of Judgment :: 25th July, 2014 HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr.Guru Vikas Sharma, appellant, present in person. None present, for the respondent...This miscellaneous appeal as per Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is preferred to question correctness of the order dated 14.3.2013 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Family Court, Bikaner. The facts necessary for adjudication of this appeal are that appellant Guru Vikas Sharma entered into a wedlock with Ms.Shweta (Priya) on 9.7.2011. Having certain differences, the couple decided to get their marriage annulled, thus, an application in accordance with Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was presented before the Family Court, Bikaner on 24.1.2012. On 15.1.2013 statements of Ms.Shweta (Priya) (AW-1) and Guru Vikas Sharma (AW-2) were recorded by the Family Court. The statements given by the couple units read a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
Ajay Rastogi, J. 1. Instant appeal has been filed by the plaintiff-appellant (wife) aggrieved by judgment and decree dated 29.05.2013 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Kota whereby the suit for divorce filed at the instance of the plaintiff-appellant on the ground of cruelty by the defendant-respondent (husband) came to be dismissed. 2. The appeal has been preferred by the plaintiff-appellant (wife) and the respondent herein is husband. The petition, filed by the wife claiming divorce u/Sec.13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, came to be dismissed by the Family Court vide judgment and decree dated 29.05.2013 despite two salient facts came on record that (1) in the FIR No.219 dated 12.09.2007 registered against the defendant-respondent (husband) at Police Station Mahila Thana, Kota for offence u/Sec.498-A, 406 and 120-B IPC after regular trial, the defendant-respondent (husband) was convicted u/Sec.498-A IPC and sentenced to undergo two years imprisonment vide judgment dated 12.10.2012, howev...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1. The instant writ application witnesses a challenge to the award dated 6th September, 1996, passed by the Labour Court, Ajmer. The President, Ajmer Adhyogik Karmachari Sangh, Ajmer, (hereinafter referred to as 'petitioner-Sangh', for short), in the writ application, has prayed for the following relief(s):- "(A) Call for the relevant file LCR No.4/96(35/84- Ajmer Udyog Karmachari Sangh V/s M/s Toshniwal Industries Pvt. Ltd., Ajmer) from the Respondent No.1. (B) To issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction and thereby quash and set aside the Award Ex.3 and consequently declar "lay off" of workman of Servashri Dhan Singhi, Shanker Singh and Ratan Singh (vide Ex.1/Ex. M-3 and Ex.2/ Ex.-M-5) as illegal, unlawful and invalid. (C) Issue a writ of mandamus, order or direction and thereby direct the manangement to pay to the aforesaid workmen the arrears of wages with all consequential benefits, deducting the amount already paid to them. (D) Costs of this writ petition be also allowed to t...
Tag this Judgment!