Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA CRL.RP No.210/2024 BETWEEN1. SHRI VISHAL RAMESH KHATWANI S/O RAMESH MAYARAM KHATWANI NO.3202, ANRIYA DWELLINGTON APARTMENT, LOTTEGOLLAHALLI DOLLARS COLONY BENGALURU NORTH56009 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI PRUTHVEEN P. KATTIMANI FOR SRI GIRIDHAR.H, ADVOCATES) AND1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE 09. RESPONDENT (BY SRI B.A.BELLIYAPPA, SPP ALONGWITH SRI VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION397R/W401CR.P.C PRAYING TO EXAMINE THE SAME AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED0911.2023 AND ALLOW THE2APPLICATION DATED0211.2023, CONNECTED WITH THE ORDER DATED0911.2023 MADE BY THE LEARNED VIII ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE IN CR.NO.256/2023. THIS PETITION HAVING BEEN RESERVED FOR ORDER, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, THE COURT PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:- CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC753Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (C) No.1404 of 2023 Sukanya Shantha Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Contents I. The Writ Petition .................................................................................................. 4 II. Submissions ........................................................................................................ 4 III. Constitutional Interpretation ................................................................................. 6 IV. The Constitution of Emancipation, Equality, and Dignity ...................................... 9 V. The Contours of Article 14 ................................................................................. 17 VI. Non-Discrimination under Article 15 ............................................................... 23 VII. The Ban on Untouchability in Article 17 ...................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R Reserved on :13. 08.2024 Pronounced on :31. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024C/W WRIT PETITION No.18539 OF2024(GM RES) IN CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024BETWEEN:1. . SRI VIKRAM BALLARI S/O UDAY KUMAR BALLARI AGED ABOUT33YEARS RESIDENT OF6H CROSS, MARATHA COLONY, DHARWAD, HUBBALLI- DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 2 . SRI KIRTIKUMAR BASAVARAJ KURAHATTI S/O BASAVARAJ T. KURAHATTI, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, RESIDENT OF ITIGATTI VILLAGE AND POST, DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 3 . SRI SANDEEP SAUDATTI S/O SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT36YEARS RESIDENT OF MARATHA COLONY, MALAPUR ROAD, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE, DHARWAD, HUBBALLI- DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 2 4 . SRI VINAYAK KATAGI S/O BASAVARAJ NINGAPPA KATAGI, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, RESIDENT OF BHUSAPPA CHOUK, KARUBAR ONI, HUBBALLI-DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 5 . SRI MAHABALESHWAR HONGAL @ MUDAKA S/O MALLAPA HONGAL AGED ABOUT38YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R Reserved on :13. 08.2024 Pronounced on :31. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024C/W WRIT PETITION No.18539 OF2024(GM RES) IN CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024BETWEEN:1. . SRI VIKRAM BALLARI S/O UDAY KUMAR BALLARI AGED ABOUT33YEARS RESIDENT OF6H CROSS, MARATHA COLONY, DHARWAD, HUBBALLI- DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 2 . SRI KIRTIKUMAR BASAVARAJ KURAHATTI S/O BASAVARAJ T. KURAHATTI, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, RESIDENT OF ITIGATTI VILLAGE AND POST, DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 3 . SRI SANDEEP SAUDATTI S/O SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT36YEARS RESIDENT OF MARATHA COLONY, MALAPUR ROAD, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE, DHARWAD, HUBBALLI- DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 2 4 . SRI VINAYAK KATAGI S/O BASAVARAJ NINGAPPA KATAGI, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, RESIDENT OF BHUSAPPA CHOUK, KARUBAR ONI, HUBBALLI-DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 5 . SRI MAHABALESHWAR HONGAL @ MUDAKA S/O MALLAPA HONGAL AGED ABOUT38YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC631REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7595 of 2021 BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS HIREHALLI SOLAR POWER PROJECT LLP & OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.7608 OF2021WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.6386 OF2021Table of Contents Facts: .......................................................................................................................................... 2 KERCs order: . ........................................................................................................................ 5 APTELs impugned order:. .................................................................................................... 6 Submissions:. ......................................................................................................................... 10 Scope of Supreme Courts appellate jurisdiction under Section 125 of the Act:13. Analysis on merits:. ................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :19. 07.2024 Pronounced on :09. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE09H DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9707 OF2023BETWEEN: MAYUKH MUKHERJEE AGED ABOUT31YEARS S/O DEBABRATA MUKHERJEE RESIDING AT NO.76/1B-76/2 GEAR ROAD, KAVERAPPA LAYOUT KADUBISANAHALLI PANATHUR, BENGALURU 67. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.78, WEST WIND FLAT-13B BLOCK-4, RAJA S. C., MALLICK ROAD, GARIA SOUTH-24, PARGANAS WEST BENGAL 700 084. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI SANDESH J.CHOUTA, SR. ADVOCATE A/W SRI PRATHEEP K. C., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY MARATHAHALLI POLICE STATION2BENGALURU CITY REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU 01. 2 . PRONAB KUMAR SHARMA S/O LATE DEBENDRA KUMAR SHARMA AGED ABOUT70YEARS RESIDING AT SETTLEMENT LINK ROAD WARD NO.5, KMB, POST P.S., KARIMGANJ STATE OF ASSAM 788 710. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI THEJESH P., HCGP FOR R1; SMT DEEPA J.,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC486IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6741 OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.12941 OF2023 SUBODH KUMAR SINGH RATHOUR ...APPELLANT VERSUS THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX ................................................................................ 2 B. IMPUGNED ORDER ................................................................................ 7 C. DEVELOPMENTS THAT OCCURRED DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. ............................................................... 10 D. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT ........................ 15 E. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT ..................... 17 F. POINTS FOR DETERMINATION ........................................................ 18 G. ANALYSIS .......................................
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 Reserved on :07. 06.2024 R Pronounced on :25. 06.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.8182 OF2022(GM - RES) BETWEEN: M/S. GVPR ENGINEERS LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT MR.MANJUNATHA SWAMY J.R., PLOT NO.739-A, ROAD NO.37 JUBILEE HILLS HYDERABAD 500 033 TELENGANA, INDIA ... PETITIONER (BY SRI MADHUSUDHAN R.NAIK, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI PRADEEP GAONKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LTD., (GOVT. OF KARNATAKA ENTERPRISES) REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR4H FLOOR, COFFEE BOARD DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560 001. 2 2 . THE CHIEF ENGINEER, UTP ZONE KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED SAGAR ROAD SHIVAMOGGA 577 201. 3 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED NO.5, UTP PROJECT DIVISION HONNALI, DAVANGERE 577 217. 4 . THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UPPER TUNGA PROJECT DIVISION KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LTD., SAGAR RO...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC447IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2668 OF2024(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.9052 of 2021) NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY NEW DELHI APPELLANT(S) VERSUS OWAIS AMIN @ CHERRY & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT M. M. Sundresh, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment rendered by the Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir at Jammu in Criminal Appeal (D) No.11/2020 dated 27.04.2021 by which the judgment rendered by the Special Judge, National Investigation Agency (NIA) (3rd Additional Sessions Judge) Jammu, has been confirmed in part, while remitting the issue pertaining to the charges framed under Sections 306 and 411 of the Jammu and Kashmir State Ranbir Penal Code SVT., 1989 (hereinafter referred to as RPC, 1989) along with Section 39 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as UAPA, 1967) for taking cognizance afresh. 13. Heard Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Addit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC449IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.6509-6510 OF2024(Arising out of SLP(C)Nos.16671-16672 of 2015) M/S. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DHARAMNATH SINGH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL, J.Leave granted.2. These appeals by special leave impugn judgment and order dated 05th May 2015, passed in FMA653with 654 of 2012 which upheld the order of the Learned Single Judge in W.P.No.22993(W) of 2007 whereby the action of the instant appellant(s) in terminating the license of the instant respondent, was quashed and set aside. 1 Background facts 3. A brief review of facts is necessary to adjudicate the present controversy. 3.1 The respondent was appointed a dealer for petrol/diesel/motor oil/grease and other such products of the appellant(s) by way Dealership Agreement1 dated 1st February 1997. 3.2 On 18th August 2007, certain officials of one SGS India2 claiming to be an agency appoin...
Tag this Judgment!