Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC384IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 3684 OF2023JAGVIR SINGH .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10th May, 2019 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Allahabad whereby the Criminal Appeal No.6318 of 2003 preferred by the appellant for challenging the judgment dated 25th November, 2003 and the order of sentence dated 27th November, 2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Mainpuri(hereinafter being referred to as the trial Court) in S.T. No.56 of 2003 was rejected.2. By the said judgment, learned trial Court convicted the accused appellant and accused Omkar for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1 1860(hereinafter being referred to as IPC) while acquitting accused Sobran and Durvin from the charges. The accused appellant as well as accused O...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC350NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.OF2024[Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.1414 of 2021]. SURESH @ UNNI @ VADI SURESH ...APPELLANT (S) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA ...RESPONDENT (S) JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 06th December, 2012 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam (High Court for short) in Criminal Appeal No.871 of 2011 wherein the High Court partly allowed the said Criminal Appeal preferred by Suresh @ Unni @ Vadi Suresh, the present Appellant, and set aside the conviction of the present Appellant under Sections 3(a) and 4(a)(i) of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 1 27(1) of the Arms Act, 1958 while confirming the conviction of the present Appellant under Sections 302, 307,143, 147, 148, 324, 326, 427 and 449 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) as re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD R DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.67670 OF2010(T-EYT) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.104278 OF2014(T-EYT) WRIT PETITION NO.103670 OF2017(T-EYT) WRIT PETITION NO.103671 OF2017(T-EYT) IN WRIT PETITION NO.67670/2010 BETWEEN: M/S GHODAWAT INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S GHODAWAT PAN MASALA PRODUCTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.) NO.5 & 6, RAGHAVENDRA COLONY KHASBAG, BELGAUM-590 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL DIRECTOR SRI. RAGHAVENDRA VISHNUTHIRTH BELGAUMKAR AGED ABOUT48YEARS S/O SRI. VISHNUTHIRTH VASUDEV BELGAUMKAR ....PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. SHIVADASS, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRAVEEN P. TARIKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA2VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. 2 . COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES VINIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA GANDHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 009. 3 . JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COM...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD R DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.67670 OF2010(T-EYT) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.104278 OF2014(T-EYT) WRIT PETITION NO.103670 OF2017(T-EYT) WRIT PETITION NO.103671 OF2017(T-EYT) IN WRIT PETITION NO.67670/2010 BETWEEN: M/S GHODAWAT INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S GHODAWAT PAN MASALA PRODUCTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.) NO.5 & 6, RAGHAVENDRA COLONY KHASBAG, BELGAUM-590 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL DIRECTOR SRI. RAGHAVENDRA VISHNUTHIRTH BELGAUMKAR AGED ABOUT48YEARS S/O SRI. VISHNUTHIRTH VASUDEV BELGAUMKAR ....PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. SHIVADASS, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRAVEEN P. TARIKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA2VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. 2 . COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES VINIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA GANDHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 009. 3 . JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COM...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD R DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.67670 OF2010(T-EYT) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.104278 OF2014(T-EYT) WRIT PETITION NO.103670 OF2017(T-EYT) WRIT PETITION NO.103671 OF2017(T-EYT) IN WRIT PETITION NO.67670/2010 BETWEEN: M/S GHODAWAT INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S GHODAWAT PAN MASALA PRODUCTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.) NO.5 & 6, RAGHAVENDRA COLONY KHASBAG, BELGAUM-590 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL DIRECTOR SRI. RAGHAVENDRA VISHNUTHIRTH BELGAUMKAR AGED ABOUT48YEARS S/O SRI. VISHNUTHIRTH VASUDEV BELGAUMKAR ....PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. SHIVADASS, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRAVEEN P. TARIKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA2VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. 2 . COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES VINIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA GANDHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 009. 3 . JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COM...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD R DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.67670 OF2010(T-EYT) C/W WRIT PETITION NO.104278 OF2014(T-EYT) WRIT PETITION NO.103670 OF2017(T-EYT) WRIT PETITION NO.103671 OF2017(T-EYT) IN WRIT PETITION NO.67670/2010 BETWEEN: M/S GHODAWAT INDUSTRIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S GHODAWAT PAN MASALA PRODUCTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.) NO.5 & 6, RAGHAVENDRA COLONY KHASBAG, BELGAUM-590 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL DIRECTOR SRI. RAGHAVENDRA VISHNUTHIRTH BELGAUMKAR AGED ABOUT48YEARS S/O SRI. VISHNUTHIRTH VASUDEV BELGAUMKAR ....PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. SHIVADASS, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. PRAVEEN P. TARIKAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. . ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA2VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. 2 . COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES VINIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA GANDHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 009. 3 . JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COM...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R Reserved on :02. 02.2024 Pronounced on :22. 04.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE22D DAY OF APRIL, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.24119 OF2022(GM-RES) BETWEEN: DR. S.M.MANNAN S/O S.SURULI RAM AGED ABOUT56YEARS RESIDING AT A-1104, EXOTICA APARTMENT BEJAI MAIN ROAD, BEJAI MANGALURU - 575 004. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI SANDESH J.CHOUTA, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W., SRI SUHAS C. S., ADVOCATE) AND: CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU) NO.36, BELLARY ROAD DENA BANK COLONY, GANGANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 032 REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING2BENGALURU - 560 001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. P.PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL. PP) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE SOURCE REPORT, THE RESULTANT, F.I.R BEARING R.C.NO.16(A)/2019 DATED2209.2019 AT ANNEXURE-C AND THE CHARGE SHEET IN SPL.C.NO.1161/2020 FILED BY THE ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC284Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No._________ of 2024 (@ Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.2772 of 2023) Vipin Sahni and another Appellants Versus Central Bureau of Investigation Respondent JUDGMENT SANJAY KUMAR, J1 Leave granted.2. Exercising power under Section 239 Cr.P.C, the learned Special Judicial Magistrate, CBI Court, Ghaziabad, discharged the appellants herein of a charge under Sections 420 and 120B IPC, vide order dated 31.08.2019 in Case No.456 of 2012 arising out of RC-219 2011 (E) 0016 1 registered on the file of Police Station CBI, EO-1, New Delhi. Aggrieved thereby, the Central Bureau of Investigation (for short, CBI) approached the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, under Section 482 Cr.P.C, by way of Application U/S482No.11426 of 2021. By order dated 20.01.2023 passed therein, the High Court set aside the discharge order and directed the learned Magistrate to proceed with the case against the appe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC269IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2595 OF2023SHOMA KANTI SEN ...APPELLANT(S) VS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ANIRUDDHA BOSE, J.The appellant before us assails the order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay passed on 17.01.2023, disposing her application for bail with liberty to approach the Trial Court for filing a fresh application for bail.2. The appellant was detained on 06.06.2018 in connection with First Investigation Report (FIR) No.04/2018 dated 08.01.2018 registered with Vishrambaug Police Station, Pune 1 alleging commission of offences under Sections 153A, 505 (1b), 117 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (1860 Code). The complaints therein related to violence that broke out at a function organised by Elgar Parishad. Certain acts of violence had taken place at Shanivarwada, Pune on 31.12.2017 thereafter. The prosecutions case is that in the sai...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC252IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4806 OF2011KRISHNADATT AWASTHY ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.4807 OF2011SUMER SINGH ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS CIVIL APPEAL No.4808 OF2011SMT. RAMRANI SINGH ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS CIVIL APPEAL No.4809 OF2011SMT. SHYAMA DEWEDI & ORS. ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS1STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. ..RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT J.K. MAHESHWARI J.1. After perusal of the judgment and view expressed by esteemed brother Justice K.V. Viswanathan, in the facts of this case, I am not in a position to agree with the reasoning and conclusions as drawn by him, for which detailed reasons supporting my view is in succeeding paragraphs.2. As per the facts of the case, the controversy in the present case revolves around selection and appointment for the post of Shiksha Karmi GradeIII in...
Tag this Judgment!