Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC239REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 1738-39 OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.) NOS. 3390-91 OF2024 NENAVATH BUJJI ETC. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: - For the convenience of the exposition, this judgement is divided in the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX .................................................................................... 3 B. IMPUGNED JUDGMENT OF THE HIGH COURT ............................. 15 C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANTS ........................ 17 D. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS .................... 20 E. ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 21 Page 1 of 55 i. Extraneous Considerations that weighed with the Detaining Authority thereby vitiating the Order of Preventive Detention. ........................... 34 ii. Summary of the Fi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC172IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No(s). 9591 of 2022) PRABHAT KUMAR MISHRA @ PRABHAT MISHRA .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF U.P. & ANR. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 26th July, 2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad rejecting the Criminal Misc. Application No.12691 of 2015 filed by the accused appellant herein under Section 482 of Court of Criminal Procedure, 1973(hereinafter being referred to as CrPC). 13. By way of the said application, the accused appellant sought quashing of proceeding of the Criminal Case No.6476 of 2005 pending against him in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad for the offences punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(hereinafter being referred to as the IPC) and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2024INSC155IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION No.29 OF2023M/S ARIF AZIM CO. LTD. PETITIONER VERSUS M/S APTECH LTD. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: - INDEX A. FACTUAL MATRIX .................................................................................... 2 B. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER ........................ 15 C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT ...................... 18 D. ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 21 i. ISSUE No.1: Whether the Limitation Act, 1963 is applicable to an application for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?. If yes, whether the present petition is barred by limitation?. ............................................................. 22 a. When does the right to apply...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC150Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.3589 OF2023High Court Bar Association, Allahabad Appellant versus State of U.P. & Ors. Respondents with Special Leave Petition (Crl.) nos.13284-13289 of 2023 and Criminal Appeal..Diary No.49052 of 2023 JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.Table of Contents A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND .............................................. 2 I. Directions in Asian Resurfacing ................................. 2 II. Order of reference to Larger Bench ........................... 7 B. SUBMISSIONS ............................................................. 8 C. ANALYSIS .................................................................. 14 I. Object of passing interim orders .............................. 14 II. High Courts power to vacate or modify interim relief .................................................................................. 16 Criminal Appeal No.3589 of 2023 etc. Page 1 of 47 III. Whether a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC92REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.704 of 2024 (@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.10047 of 2023) GURWINDER SINGH APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS JUDGEMENT Aravind Kumar J.1. Leave granted.2. The present appeal impugns the order dated 24.04.2023 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CRA-D No.144 of 2022 (O&M) whereby the High Court has upheld the order dated 16.12.2021 passed by the Special Judge, NIA Court, SAS Nagar, Mohali in an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) filed by the Appellant herein-Gurwinder Singh along with other co- accused seeking regular bail in NIA Case RC.19/2020/NIA/DLI, registered under Sections 124A, 153A, 153B, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 1 (IPC), Section(s) 17, 18, 19 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAP Act) and Sections 25 and 54 of the Arms Act, 1959, which cam...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:2217 MFA No.103033 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.103033 OF2015(LAC) BETWEEN:1. SRI.TIPPANNA S/O. BASAPPA SANADI @ SALAHALLI, AGE:58. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KORAKOPPA VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, BELAGAVI DISTRICT.2. SRI. ADIVEPPA S/O. BASAPPA SANADI @ SALAHALLI, AGE:52. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KORAKOPPA VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, BELAGAVI DISTRICT.3. SRI. YALLAPPA S/O. BASAPPA SANADI @ SALAHALLI, AGE:54. YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KORAKOPPA VILLAGE, SAUNDATTI TALUKA, BELAGAVI DISTRICT. APPELLANTS (BY SRI. G.N. NARASAMMANAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BAILHONGAL, SUB DIVISION BAILHONGAL2 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION, DAK BUNGALOW, SHAHAPUR, BELAGAVI.3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NORTH ZONE, MINOR IRRIGATION, VIJAYAPURA, TQ and DIST:VIJAYAPURA. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN Y. DEVAREDDIYAVAR, H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC35IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION S.L.P.(C) No.21211 of 2012 BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR PETITIONER VERSUS BHANWAR SINGH AND OTHERS RESPONDENT(S) WITH SLP (C) No.22377 of 2012 WITH SLP (C) No.23551 OF2012WITH SLP (C) No.29698 OF2012WITH SLP (C) No.25186 OF2012WITH SLP (C) No.31905 OF2013WITH SLP (C) No.31724 OF20121 ORDER1 The Chittorgarh Fort represents the quintessence of a tribute to nationalism, courage, medieval chivalry, and sacrifice exhibited between the seventh and the sixteenth centuries by several rulers, like the Mewar rulers of Sisodia, their kinsmen, women, and children. The Chittorgarh Fort has weathered and withstood many battles and has been a witness to the power and pride of the kings who occupied the Fort. The history is replete with brave, extraordinary and indomitable courage exhibited by the rulers and occupants of the Fort. 1.1 The Chittorgarh Fort is a notified monument under the Anc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC27Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3548 OF2017M/s. K.P. Mozika Appellant versus Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Ors. Respondents with Civil Appeal No.4658 of 2013 Civil Appeal No.4657 of 2013 Civil Appeal No.383 of 2013 Civil Appeal No.3580 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.8714 of 2012 Civil Appeal No.8705 of 2012 Civil Appeal No.8710 of 2012 Civil Appeal No.9291 of 2012 Civil Appeal No.8715 of 2012 Civil Appeal No.3579 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.3578 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.4659 of 2013 Civil Appeal No.4661 of 2013 Civil Appeal No.3548 of 2017 etc. Page 1 of 41 Civil Appeal No.4660 of 2013 Civil Appeal No.3573 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.3575 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.3574 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.3577 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.3576 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.4662 of 2013 Civil Appeal No.3549 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.3557 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.7954 of 2012 Civil Appeal No.8693 of 2012 Civil Appeal No.3554 of 2017 Civil Appeal No.3556 of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC24REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.491 OF2022BILKIS YAKUB RASOOL ...PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.319 OF2022WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.326 OF2022WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.352 OF2022WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.403 OF2022WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.422 OF2022JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA, J.Table of Contents Sr. Particulars Page No(s). No.1 Preface 3-5 2 Details of the writ petitioners 5-9 3 Factual Background 9-25 Writ Petition (Crl.) No.491 of 2022 Etc. Page 1 of 251 4 Counter affidavit of State of Gujarat 25-47 5 Submissions 47-87 6 Reply Arguments 87-101 7 Points for consideration 101-251 (A) Re: Point No.1: Whether the petition 102-106 filed by one of the victims in Writ Petition (Crl.) No.491 of 2022 under Article 32 of the Constitution is maintainable?. (B) Re: Point No.2: Whether the writ petitions filed as Public Interest 106-117 Litigation (PIL) assailing the impugned orders of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2024 INSC20NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1348 OF2011JITENDRA KUMAR MISHRA @ JITTU APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1347 OF2011JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Four persons namely Manja alias Amit Mishra, Jitendra Kumar Mishra @ Jittu, Gledwin alias Banti Isai and Ajay alias Ajayya were convicted to life imprisonment under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC with a fine of Rs.5000/- each, and in default of payment of Page 1 of 10 fine with a further rigorous imprisonment for six months in Sessions Trial Number 378 of 2007 vide judgment and order dated 15.09.2008 passed by the 13th Additional Session Judge (Fast Track), Jabalpur, M.P.3. On appeals, i.e., Criminal Appeal No.2031 of 2008 preferred by Manja @ Amit Mishra and Jitendra Kumar Mishra @ Jittu together and Criminal Appeal No.2237 of 2008 preferred by Gledwin @ Banti Isai and Ajay @ Ajayya togeth...
Tag this Judgment!