Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2023INSC1071IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.3838 Of 2023 (Arising out of Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.11129 Of 2023) Afjal Ansari .Appellant(s) versus State of UP .Respondent(s) JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.07.2023, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter, High Court), partially allowing the application filed by the Appellant under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter, CrPC), for the stay on the sentence and conviction, awarded by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, MP/MLA Court, Ghazipur (hereinafter, Trial Court) vide judgement and order dated 29.04.2023. The High Court, has through the impugned order, Page 1 of 19 suspended the Appellants sentence and granted him bail but the stay on conviction has been declined. FACTS:3. At this juncture, it is imperative to delve into the factual matrix to set out ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable 2023 INSC1058IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL WRIT / APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.1099 of 2019 IN RE: ARTICLE370OF THE CONSTITUTION With Writ Petition (C) No.871 of 2015 With Writ Petition (C) No.722 of 2014 With SLP (C) No.19618 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.1013 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1082 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1068 of 2019 1 With Writ Petition (C) No.1037 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1062 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1070 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1104 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1165 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1210 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1222 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.396 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.756 of 2017 With Writ Petition (C) No.398 pf 2018 With 2 Writ Petition (C) No.924 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1092 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1162 of 2018 With Writ Petition (C) No.1048 of 2019 With Writ Petition (C) No.1268 of 2019 And With Writ Petition (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 2023 INSC1027REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.3619 OF2023(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.5136 OF2022 SIVAMANI AND ANR. APPELLANTS APPELLANT NO.1: SIVAMANI APPELLANT NO.2: DINESH KUMAR VERSUS STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELLORE TALUK POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT. RESPONDENT JUDGMENT AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted. 23. The present appeal is directed against the Final Order and Judgment dated 06.08.2021 (hereinafter referred to as the Impugned Judgment) passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras (hereinafter referred to as the High Court) in Criminal Appeal No.228 of 2015, whereby the appeal filed by the appellants against their conviction by the Trial Court under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the IPC) and imposition of fine of Rs.1000/- each has been confirmed, but the sentence of 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - NC:2023. KHC:39426 WP No.24195 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.24195 OF2023(GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. KALAVATHI W/O MANJUNATHA M., AGED ABOUT44YEARS R/AT NO.35, HARIPRIYA NILAYA VEERENAHALLI VILLAGE VIRGONAGAR POST BIDARHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK BENGALURU 560 049. PETITIONER (BY SRI SHARATH S.GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARNATAKA STATE POLICE HEAD QUARTERS No.2, NRUPATUNGA ROAD BENGALURU 560 001.2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BANGALORE DISTRICT NO.5, MILLERS ROAD BENGALURU 560 052.-. 2 - NC:2023. KHC:39426 WP No.24195 of 2023 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HOSKOTE SUB-DIVISION HOSKOTE - 562 114.4. AVALAHALLI POLICE STATION NH75, VIRGONAGAR POST OFFICE AVAALAHALLI, BIDARAHALLI UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU 560 049 REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER.5. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN K.G.ROAD BEHIND KANDAYA ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2023INSC988IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.. OF2023(SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.6548 OF2022 STATE OF KARNATAKA Appellant(s) VERSUS T. NASEER @ NASIR @ THANDIANTAVIDA NASEER @ UMARHAZI @ HAZI & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT RAJESH BINDAL, J.1. Leave granted.2. Vide order1 passed by the High Court2 in Criminal Petition No.2585 of 2019 filed by the appellant-State, an order dated 18.01.2018 passed by the Trial Court3 was upheld. Vide the aforesaid order an 1 Dated 27.01.2022. 2 High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. 3 XLVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (Special Court for Trial of CBI Cases) City Civil Court, Bangalore. 1 applications4 filed by the prosecution under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C.5, seeking recall of M. Krishna (PW-189) and permit the prosecution to produce the report and the certificate under Section 65B of the Act6 was rejected.3. Genesis of the trial is that in a serial bomb blasts which took place i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2023INSC932IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO(S). 184 OF2023IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 8553 OF2022CHENNAI METRO RAIL LIMITED ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S TRANSTONNELSTROY AFCONS (JV) & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4591 OF2023JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. Chennai Metro Rail Limited, the applicant (hereinafter referred to as Chennai Metro), a joint venture between the Central Government and the Government of Tamil Nadu, had, pursuant to a public tender, awarded the contract to the respondent (hereafter referred to as Afcons) have called for a project the total value of Rs. 1566 crores. The contract was signed on 31.01.2011. Eventually, on 15.04.2021, Afcons sought a reference of several heads of disputes to arbitration after certain interlocutory proceedings. Eventually on 29.04.2021, 2 it was agreed that two dispute heads (claim 2(b) to 2(d)) and the Chennai Metros counter ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2023NSC895 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1578 OF2012KAMAL PRASAD & ORS. APPELLANT(S) Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (NOW STATE OF CHHATTISGARH) RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT SANJAY KAROL J., 1. This appeal calls into question the correctness of a judgment and order passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh in Criminal Appeal No.596 of 1992 by which the guilt of the accused and the sentence of imprisonment imposed in Sessions Trial No.198 of 1988 vide a judgment dated 11.05.1992 stands confirmed. 1- [Cr. A No.1578 OF2012 2. Challenging their conviction, before us are three convict(s) - appellants, namely, Kamal Prasad (A-3); Shersingh (A-6); and Bhavdas (A-9).3. The convict-appellants stand convicted of having committed an offence punishable under Sections 148, 302 read with 149, 307 read with 149, Indian Penal Code, 18601 and Sections 4/5 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908 under which the sentence awarded varies from rigorous i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE06H DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.8076 OF2023BETWEEN:1. . SRI N.BHARATH REDDY S/O SRI N.SURYANARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT32YEARS R/AT51 GOPALASWAMY ROAD GANDHINAGAR BALLARI - 583 103. 2 . SRI N.SURYANARAYANA REDDY S/O N.GOWRANNA AGED ABOUT68YEARS R/AT51 GOPALASWAMY ROAD, GANDHINAGAR BALLARI - 583 103. 3 . SMT. N.SUVARNA W/O N.SURYANARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT63YEARS R/AT51 GOPALASWAMY ROAD GANDHINAGAR BALLARI - 583 103. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SENIOR COUNSEL REPTD., AND SRI PRAVEEN P.TARIKAR, ADVOCATE) 2 AND:1. . SRI C.SUNIL KUMAR S/O C.PRABHAKAR REDDY AGED ABOUT46YEARS R/AT No.D3, VEERANAGOWDA COLONY BESIDE BALLRI CLUB BALLARI - 583 103. 2 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD THROUGH GANDHINAGAR POLICE STATION DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD SATYA NARAYANA PET BALLARI - 583 101. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE2023NSC788 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF2023[ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRIMINAL) No.8510 OF2023 AMEENA BEGUM APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT DIPANKAR DATTA, J.Leave granted. THE JUDGMENT UNDER CHALLENGE2 Under assail in this appeal is a judgment and order dated 28th June, 2023 of a Division Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana (High Court, hereafter). Vide the impugned judgment, a writ petition1 instituted by the appellant seeking a writ of habeas corpus was dismissed and the order of detention dated 24th March, 2023 1 W.P. No.9000 of 2023 1 (Detention Order, hereafter) of the appellants husband (Detenu, hereafter), impugned therein, upheld. THE ORDER OF DETENTION AND FURTHER PROCEEDINGS3 The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City (Commissioner, hereafter) passed the Detention Order against the Detenu under the provisions of section 3(2) of the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Acti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
2023 INSC698Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No 19206 of 2023 Dinganglung Gangmei ... Petitioner(s) Versus Mutum Churamani Meetei & Ors ... Respondent(s) WITH Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No 19210 of 2023 Writ Petition (Civil) No 540 of 2023 Writ Petition (Civil) No 576 of 2023 Writ Petition (Civil) No 572 of 2023 Writ Petition (Civil) No 574 of 2023 Writ Petition (Criminal) No 321 of 2023 Writ Petition (Criminal) No 327 of 2023 Writ Petition (Criminal) No 329 of 2023 Writ Petition (Civil) No 802 of 2023 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI1 The State of Manipur has been besieged by sectarian strife since the first week of May 2023.2. On 27 March 2023, the Acting Chief Justice of the High Court of Manipur issued directions in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution1 to the Government of Manipur directing it to respond to a communication dated 29 May 2013 of the Minist...
Tag this Judgment!