Explainer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explainer Sorted by: recent Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 3,297 results (0.066 seconds)Universal Ferro and Allied Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: (2005)(98)ECC779
..... for the purposes of excise notification no 119 75 ce dated 30 04 75 was explained by the hon ble supreme court in their decision in the case of prestige engineering .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri V.C. Nannapaneni Vs. Asstt. Cit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: (2005)94ITD309(Hyd.)
..... received both by the company and the individual would partake the character of revenue receipt explaining further it was submitted that natco manufactured and marketed 150 products out of which only .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindo Gulf Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: (2005)(182)ELT77Tri(Mum.)bai
..... of the goods will be only when it incorporates the patented process this submission is explained with an illustrative given in advisory opinion 4 12 of the technical committee on customs .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLanka Nirmala Devi and anr. Vs. V. Rama Devi and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: 2005(3)ALD666
..... the exclusive owner of the same further she stated that in the document it was explained as to why the property was given to the said lakshma reddy she also submitted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Airlines Vs. E.S.i. Corporation
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: 2005(2)ALT598; [2005(106)FLR457]; (2005)IILLJ725AP
..... more persons carry on the manufacturing process without the aid of the power it further explains that the precincts of a factory or any part of the establishment where the manufacturing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Pal Vs. Vinod Kumar and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: II(2005)ACC545
..... to the claimant by the pgi and why it was purchased again has not been explained 6 the prices of the medicines and other equipments in the bills issued by singla .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Arthur Anderson and Co.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: (2005)94TTJ(Mum.)736
..... on the submissions of the assessee and perusal of material shown by the assessee to explain the nature of services received from awsc the ao came to inter alia the following .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome Tax Officer Vs. Bua Dass
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: (2005)97TTJ(Asr.)650
..... ao on 16th aug 2002 and 27th aug 2002 wherein he explained that at the time when ddit inv recorded his statement he ..... construction was made for rs 70 000 however subsequently the assessee explained that property was indeed purchased by his two sons s sh ..... of investments made by the sons were also duly furnished and explained it was further stated that property actually belonged to wakf board .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndia Forge and Drop Stampings Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: (2005)(183)ELT453Tri(Mum.)bai
..... rings under the guise of scrap at reduced price the appellant explained that a strict quality control is maintained at their end and ..... t of scrap loaded in the intercepted truck the appellants have explained that on 03 03 98 they had loaded the truck with ..... clearance of bearing rings under the guise of scrap the appellants have explained that it was rejected and damaged rings received back by them .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSilverchem Industries (Bombay), Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-31-2004
Reported in: (2005)(98)ECC801
..... agreement was drawn between the two against the payment of consideration 3 it has been explained to us by the ld advocate that they are purchasing ready to use lpg from .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial