Explain - Year 2014 - Judgments

Jan 15 2014 (HC)

“3. the Appellant Was Required to ExplaIn Each Day of Delay. in the ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-15-2014

..... application for condonation of delay no plausible ground has been mentioned explaining the delay the appellant merely stated that he was oblivious of ..... is well settled that each day of delay has to be explained in the case under article 116 b of the limitation ..... delay in filing the appeal and the delay has not been explained the application for condonation of delay is dismissed consequently the appeal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 21 2014 (HC)

“3. the Prosecution Has to ExplaIn Such an Inconsistency in the Firs ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-21-2014

..... 2014 and repelled the same argument in the following manner 3 the prosecution has to explain such an inconsistency in the first information report as well the in the fsl report .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 10 2014 (HC)

institute for Inner Studies and ors. Vs. Charlotte Anderson and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-10-2014

..... the copyright office s statement of policy because the copyright office did not produce records explaining the recent shift or even identify those records so that the court could determine the ..... and the fact that it is not a dramatic performance emphasis supplied and as explicitly explained by the copyright office compilations of exercises specifically yoga exercises are not copyrightable an example .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 2014 (FN)

Mccutcheon Vs. Federal Election Comm’n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-02-2014

..... degree to which each encroaches upon protected first amendment interests expenditure limits the court explained necessarily reduce the quantity of expression by restricting the number of issues discussed the ..... the asserted public interest usually framed as an important or compelling governmental interest as explained below we do not doubt the compelling nature of the collective interest in preventing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2014 (FN)

Schuette Vs. Bamn

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-22-2014

..... should settle the matter section 26 draws a racial distinction as the seattle court explained when the political process or the decisionmaking mechanism used to address racially conscious legislation and ..... equally this is the second prong of the political process doctrine see at 5 explaining that the political process doctrine is implicated w hen the majority reconfigures the political process .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2014 (HC)

State Through Reference Vs. Ram Singh and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-13-2014

..... unfit for making any statement pw 52 dr p k verma has more than satisfactorily explained this aspect of the matter in his cross examination he specifically states that injection morphine ..... as against the rule of life imprisonment and by necessary implication a legal obligation to explain them as distinguished from the expression reasons follow the legislative mandate of assigning special reasons .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2014 (HC)

S.K. JaIn Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2014

..... revealed that payments to 119 persons through hawala channels were partly explained by the accused s k jain who is the master of ..... section 35 of the fema was limited to questions of law as explained by the supreme court in raj kumar shivhare v assistant director ..... section 56 fera they continued to be accused their refusal to explain the entries could not lead to an adverse inference being drawn .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 26 2014 (FN)

Kennedy Vs. the Charity Commission

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-26-2014

..... imparting information on matters of public interest then prior to turning to article 8 it explained its disagreement with the commission but specifically with regard to the suggested obligation to collect ..... when he was a member of the court of appeal lord toulson invoked in explaining why journalists were entitled to disclosure by a magistrates court of witness statements and correspondence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 22 2014 (FN)

R (on the Application of Hs2 Action Alliance Limited and Others) Vs. t ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-22-2014

..... must therefore be based upon appropriate information 86 in paragraphs 85 and 86 the court explained how that approach applied to national legislatures 85 consequently the national legislature must have ..... making should contribute to more sustainable and effective solutions 132 as advocate general kokott explained in her opinion in terre wallonne asbl and inter environnement wallonie asbl v region .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 2014 (FN)

Lawrence and Another Vs. Coventry and Others

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-26-2014

..... and decisions alter the character of a neighbourhood as jackson lj explained 2012 1 wlr 2127 para 57 even though the implementation of ..... planning situation in relation to the appellants nuisance claim as already explained paras 77 79 above the judge was wrong to hold that ..... more modern activities such as oil refineries but as lord wilberforce explained in allen v gulf oil refining ltd 1981 ac 1001 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Explain - Judgment Search Results