Explain - Judgment Search Results

Abbasbhai E. Lokhandwala Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (1990)35ITD50(Pune.)

..... the conclusion that gold jewellery of 610 4 grams had still remained to be explained the assessee explained that these ornaments were acquired from time to time from the accounted sources incomes ..... authority for the proposition that shri abbasbhai had taken upon himself whole responsibility for explaining the entire unexplained jewellery the offer was made in this letter without prejudice besides .....

Walton Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and predictability the former requirement was designed to achieve the court has attempted to explain the contradiction by saying that the two requirements serve different functions the first serves ..... the basis of unspecified aggravating factors in other words classification versus individuation does not explain the opposite treatment of aggravating and mitigating factors it is merely one way of .....

Rutan Vs. Republican Party

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or had only dismissed them on the basis of their private political beliefs we explained that conditioning continued public employment on an employee s having obtained support from a particular ..... from dismissal unavailing the court cited a passage from the plurality opinion in wygant explaining that school boards attempting to redress past discrimination must choose methods that broadly distribute the .....

Pennsylvania Vs. Muniz

Court: US Supreme Court

..... testimonial and communicative statements the protections afforded by miranda are invoked ibid the court explained that muniz s answer to the question regarding his sixth birthday and the statements ..... merely because the questions were not intended to elicit information for investigatory purposes as explained above the innis test focuses primarily upon the perspective of the suspect perkins ante .....

United States Vs. Ojeda Rios

Court: US Supreme Court

..... obtained immediately upon expiration of the underlying surveillance order the absence the government must satisfactorily explain encompasses not only the total absence of a seal but also the absence of ..... explanation requirement applies to delays in sealing tapes it is satisfied if the government first explains why the delay occurred and then demonstrates that the tapes are authentic this submission .....

Metro Broadcasting Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and programming has been repeatedly recognized by both the commission and the courts congress explained that it sought to promote the diversification of media ownership and consequent diversification of ..... link between minority ownership and diversity in introducing s 1095 for example senator lautenberg explained that d iversity of ownership does promote diversity of views minority broadcasters serve .....

Dhorajia Construction Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1992)42ITD450(Ahd.)

..... those partners should not have been treated as having been satisfactorily explained 14 on the other hand mr h m talati advocate for ..... with the ito that the said credits had not been satisfactorily explained by the assessee firm though appearing in its books in the ..... relative rather a heavy burden is cast upon the assessee to explain that the said credit did not represent his income from undisclosed .....

Cruzan Vs. Director, Mdh

Court: US Supreme Court

..... majority offers several justifications for missouri s heightened evidentiary standard first the majority explains that the state may constitutionally adopt this rule to govern determinations of an incompetent s ..... trial court s evaluation of state policy in his persuasive dissent judge blackmar explained that decisions about the care of chronically ill patients were traditionally private my disagreement .....

American Trucking Ass'ns Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... supreme court hold that petitioners presented a meritorious constitutional challenge as the plurality today explains the judgment of the arkansas supreme court constituted a decision that whatever else arkansas ..... should play no role in determining the substantive legal rights of parties justice harlan explained the distinction between retroactivity as a choice of law principle and the recognition of .....

AustIn Vs. Mich. Chamber of Comm.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... advantages given to corporations ibid that state interest assuming it is compelling does indeed explain why the state chose to silence only corporations rather than wealthy individuals as ..... omitted from this electronic version the advertisement discussed the local economy and unemployment and explained why the candidate supported by the chamber would understand and improve local economic conditions .....