Explain - Judgment Search Results

indra Sawhney Etc. Etc Vs. Union of India and Others, Etc. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC477; [1992]Supp2SCR454; 1992DGLS(soft)768:1992Supp(3)SCC217

..... or posts may theoretically and conceivably means some impairment of efficiency but then it explains it away by saying but the risk involved in sacrificing efficiency of administration must ..... is further not granted relaxation in passing the examinations in fact this has been explained as valid basis in american decisions furnishing justification for racial admissions on lower percentage rationale .....

Reno Vs. Flores

Court: US Supreme Court

..... self incrimination when those proceedings may result in the child s institutional confinement as we explained ultimately however we confront the reality of the juvenile court process a boy is ..... with the juvenile care agreement the fact that the normal forms of custody have faltered explains why the ins program facially challenged here survives heightened substantive due process scrutiny where a .....

Bomi Munchershaw Mistry Vs. Kesharwani Co-operative Housing Society Lt ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1993(2)BomCR329

..... maneckabad ratan villa and the surrounding properties the note on top explains the burnt sienna colouring as depicting means of access to ..... date though when the words are ambiguous they may be explained by the previous or contemporaneous conduct of the parties as ..... have subjected them to the painful duty of having to explain their earlier silence subsequent conduct therefore is of no assistance .....

Dhiraj A. Sharma Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... fact that the assessee during the course of the assessment proceedings on being required to explain the valuation of stock had voluntarily filed revised returns declaring additional income this voluntariness ..... enquiries into the question of valuation of stock and had required the assessee to explain the basis of valuation in support of his arguments the learned departmental representative relied .....

Jodha Khoda Rabari and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Gujarat and Etc.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1992CriLJ3298

..... of dharamsinh mavji popat mavji dhanji mavji dhanji bhagwan as explained by him in his chief examination odhavji bhagwan parshottam mulji ..... the statement of ganesh zaver has been more than amply explained in the circumstances in which witness ganesh zaver as also ..... these three witnesses the facts and circumstances of the case clearly explains a small delay in recording the statements of the eye .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Rajmal Lakhichand

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (1993)47ITD563(Pune.)

..... stock of the assessee for which the source of investment was not explained satisfactorily therefore the value of excess gold jewellery found was assessed ..... to customers could not mean that the repairs register did not explain the stock of gold as on 5 5 1976 coming to ..... of such gold lying with the assessee could be available to explain the excess found by the central excise authorities on 5 5 .....

Foucha Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... passage that justice thomas quotes prefaces a more important passage that he omits mter explaining the rationale for the questionable provision the commentary states constitutional doubts exist about the ..... vitek is simply not a relevant consideration where insanity acquittees are involved as we explained in jones a criminal defendant who successfully raises the insanity defense necessarily is .....

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. Vs. Casey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... price would be paid for overruling our analysis 865 would not be complete however without explaining why overruling roe s central holding would not only reach an unjustifiable result under ..... the fewest financial resources those who must travel long distances and those who have difficulty explaining their whereabouts to husbands employers or others the 24 hour waiting period will be particularly .....

Wright Vs. West

Court: US Supreme Court

..... law permits an inference that a person who fails to explain or falsely explains his exclusive possession of recently stolen property is the ..... a prior felony conviction but denied having stolen the items explaining that he frequently bought and sold merchandise at different flea ..... at the time of the prisoner s conviction as we explained earlier this term when a petitioner seeks federal habeas relief .....

Eastman Kodak Co. Vs. Image Technical Services, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... monopoly share of the service market thus liability turns on whether valid business reasons can explain kodak s actions however none of its asserted business justifications a commitment to quality ..... to fend off summary judgment but this showing could easily be made as i have explained with respect to virtually any manufacturer of differentiated products requiring aftermarket support by permitting .....