Explain - Judgment Search Results

Seminole Tribe of FlA. Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state immunity was somehow invisibly codified as an independent constitutional defense as justice stevens persuasively explains in greater detail ante at 78 81 justice iredell s dissent focused on the ..... taken as affirming that article iii itself incorporated a constitutional immunity doctrine how else to explain justice harlan s concurring opinion in hans which stated practically in the same breath .....

Morse Vs. Republican Party of VA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... functions they perform and no matter what authority the state grants them as we have explained on that construction even situations involving blatant discrimination by political parties of the kind ..... in terry began discriminating against minority voters as early as 1889 and as we have explained they operated entirely outside the framework of texas electoral laws finally it is highly counterintuitive .....

Most. Rev. P.M.A. Metropolitan and Others, Etc. Etc. Vs. Moran Mar Mar ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC2001; JT1995(5)SC1; 1995(4)SCALE1; 1995Supp(4)SCC286; [1995]Supp1SCR542

..... right freely to profess practice and propagate religion to every person its reach has been explained in various decisions in his holiness srimad perarulala ethiraja ramanuja jeeyar swami etc v the ..... appropriate trust properly for themselves under hill on the law of trusts and trustees has explained in thus however the crucial difference surely is that no absolutely entitled members exist if .....

Kyles Vs. Whitley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... presented testimony that beanie was romantically interested in pinky burns to explain the pet food found in kyles s apartment there was ..... took the stand denying any involvement in the shooting he explained his fingerprints on the cash register receipt found in dye ..... justice ginsburg and justice breyer join concurring as the court has explained this case presents an important legal issue see ante at .....

Adarand Constructors, Inc. Vs. Peandntilde;a

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is the job of the court applying strict scrutiny the principle of consistency explains the circumstances in which the injury requiring strict scrutiny occurs the application of ..... situation special justification exists to depart from the recently decided case as we have explained metro broadcasting undermined important principles of this court s equal protection jurisprudence established .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Gurubachansingh J. Juneja

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

..... receipt from him of having received rs 1 lakh the assessee explained before the search party that this was obtained only to safeguard ..... 1987 submitted to the income tax officer and also tried to explain the difference and also agreed to sustain the gross profit addition ..... portion of the same in the following paragraph i have already explained to your honour the nature of the entries appearing in those .....

Chandris, Inc. Vs. Latsis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not necessarily restrict the worker to a remedy under that statute we explained that w hile in some cases a ship repairman may lack ..... of making her seaworthy and therefore had been withdrawn from navigation we explained that in such cases the focus should be upon the status ..... ployee s connection to a vessel in navigation this rule best explains our case law and is consistent with the pre jones act .....

Man Bharan Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1996(0)MPLJ671

..... the injuries caused to the accused appellant have not been explained by the prosecution therefore the accused appellant is entitled to ..... accused appellant had also sustained injuries which have not been explained by the prosecution and that the said injuries on the ..... doubt it becomes hardly necessary for the prosecution to again explain how and in what circumstances injuries have been inflicted on .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Gurubachhan Singh J. JunejA.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1995)55ITD75(Ahd.)

..... receipt from him of having received rs 1 lakh the assessee explained before the search party that this was obtained only to safeguard ..... seized in the raid operation and assessee was under obligation to explain the difference pointed out by the ito which could not be ..... portion of the same in the following paragraph i have already explained to your honour the nature of the entries appearing in those .....

income Tax Officer Vs. Gurubachansingh J. JunejA.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1996)54TTJ(Ahd.)1

..... receipt from him of having received rs 1 lakh the assessee explained before the search party that this was obtained only to safeguard ..... 27th march 1987 submitted to the ito and also tried to explain the difference and also agreed to sustain the gross profit addition ..... portion of the same in the following paragraph i have already explained to your honour the nature of the entries appearing in those .....