Executive Function - Year 1998 - Judgments

Jan 29 1998 (HC)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee Vs. K.S. Nirvanappa and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-29-1998

Reported in: ILR1998KAR1979; (1999)ILLJ741Kant

..... even modern notions of sovereignty one of the tests to determine if the legislative or executive function is sovereign in nature is whether the state is answerable for such actions in courts ..... as per the decision in this case one of the tests to determine whether the executive function is sovereign in nature is to find out whether the state is answerable for such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 26 1998 (HC)

Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Kadur, Chickmagalur District Vs ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-26-1998

Reported in: 1998(3)KarLJ195

..... even modern notions of sovereignty one of the tests to determine if the legislative or executive function is sovereign in nature is whether the state is answerable for such actions in courts ..... as per the decision in this case one of the tests to determine whether the executive function is sovereign in nature is to find out whether the state is answerable for such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 21 1998 (HC)

H.T. Somashekar Reddy Vs. Government of Karnataka and Another

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-21-1998

Reported in: 2000(1)KarLJ224

..... being supervisory can be exercised to rein in any unbridled executive functioning under the guise of preventing the abuse of power ..... the executive functionary of the state the democratic set up to which the polity is so deeply committed cannot function properly ..... mysore the project report was prepared on the concept of executing work through private entrepreneurs to meet their expenditure maintenance .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 1998 (HC)

Rajendra Kumar Mohatta Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-25-1998

Reported in: 1999IAD(Delhi)170; 75(1998)DLT836

..... law requirement of procedural propriety depends on the subject matter of the decision the executive functions of the decision maker if the decision is not that of an administrative tribunal ..... aforementioned view in a system governed by rule of law discretion when conferred upon executive authorities must be confined within clearly defined limits non arbitrariness being a necessary concomitant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 1998 (HC)

Tariq Riyaz Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Mar-09-1998

Reported in: 1998CriLJ4437

..... their lordships accepted that exercise of power under section 321 of the code is an executive function of the public prosecutor for which statutory discretion has been vested in him but the ..... the exercise of the judicial discretion for granting the consent would normally mean that the executive function of the public prosecutor has not been improperly exercised or that is not an attempt .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 09 1998 (HC)

Kanchi Fleet Movers Vs. the Collector of Solapur and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-09-1998

Reported in: 1998(3)ALLMR474; 1998(4)BomCR268; (1998)2BOMLR751; 1998(3)MhLj307

..... mood in england the power of judicial review is exercised to rein in any unbridled executive functioning the restraint has two contemporary manifestations one is the ambit of judicial intervention the other ..... public owned property is not to be dealt with at the absolute discretion of the executive certain precepts and principles have to be observed public interest is the paramount consideration one .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 1998 (HC)

Dalit Sena, Karnataka Vs. the Karnatak University, Dharwad and Another

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-18-1998

Reported in: 1999(2)KarLJ1

..... courts of law instead of dispensing justice would have to take upon themselves administrative and executive functions it was further held it is only when courts are appraised of gross violation of ..... see that it does not overstep the limits of its judicial function and trespass into areas which are reserved to the executive and the legislature by the constitution the public interest litigation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 11 1998 (HC)

i.V.R. Constructions Ltd. Vs. Sukdevraj Sharma and Bros and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-11-1998

Reported in: 1998(6)ALD467; 1998(6)ALT245

..... mood in england the judicial power of review is exercised to rein in any unbridled executive functioning the restraint has two contemporary manifestations one is the ambit of judicial intervention the other ..... sharma and brothers against four respondents namely 1 union of india department of telecommunications 2 executive engineer telecom civil division i 3 chief engineer telecom civil zone and 4 m s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 1998 (HC)

Khan Brothers and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-03-1998

Reported in: (1998)2CALLT74(HC)

..... sovereignty one of the tests to determine if the legislative or executive function is sovereign in nature is whether the state is answerable for ..... legislate on topics and subject carved out for it similarly the executive is free to implement and administer the law a law ..... for acts performance by the state either in its legislative or executive capacity it should not be answerable in torts that would be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 17 1998 (HC)

Committee of Management, J.V. Inter College, Rajupur and Others Vs. De ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Aug-17-1998

Reported in: 1999(1)AWC381

..... before the division bench it was impliedly approved in carrying on the general administrative functions of the state executive functions are performed by hierarchy of officers who are supposed to act according to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Executive Function - Judgment Search Results