Executive Function - Judgment Search Results

Ujjam Bai. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1962SC1621; 1963(1)SCR778

..... entrusted the work of levy and collection of taxes that that is primarily an executive function that the officers have no doubt to act judicially in determining that tax ..... as institutions and is not to be understood a reference to their functions viz to bodies performing executive and legislative functions is perhaps forcefully brought out by the inclusion of local authorities in the definition of .....

Freytag Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the internal revenue service that this much or that much tax is owed a classic executive function for 18 years its predecessor the board of tax appeals did the very same thing ..... 26 u s c 1100 1952 ed and continued to perform the same function as an executive agency it possessed many of the accoutrements the court considers quintessentially judicial ante at 501 .....

Revajeethu Builders and Developers Vs. S. Vasudeva

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1991KAR1417; 1991(1)KarLJ522

..... of law instead of dispensing justice will have to take upon themselves administrative and executive functions 25 we have already expressed earlier in the course of this order that limitations ..... set up these considerations are wholly irrelevant in judicial approach but because otherwise functioning effectively would become difficult in a democracy in the result the appeals filed by revajeethu .....

Thirubhuvanam Silk Handloom Weavers' Co-operative Production and Sales ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1992)2MLJ260

..... doc trine of separation of power that just as legislative and executive functions judicial review is the basic or essential function assigned to the courts tribunals or other form of judicial ..... necessity of separating judicial power from the executive and legislative branches of government montesquieu was the first to conceive of the three functions of government as exercised by three organs .....

Vikrant Tyres Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1991(33)ECC147; 1991LC25(Karnataka); 1992(61)ELT381(Kar); 1991(2)KarLJ346

..... the estoppel is applicable against the government in the exercise of its governmental public or executive functions the supreme court of course reiterated that there can be no promissory estoppel against the ..... n rana 1964 5scr294 sri shah j as he then was enumerated the functions of government under three heads executive legislative and judiciary that case arose under the land acquisition act vis .....

R.K. Kawatra, Etc. Vs. D.S.i.D.C., Etc.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1992Delhi28

..... against the government in the exercise of its governmental public or executive functions and the doctrine of executive necessity or freedom of future executive action cannot be invoked to defeat the applicability of the ..... that case that the doctrine of promissory estoppel is not available against the exercise of executive functions of the state and the state cannot be prevented from exercising its .....

Ashok Kumar Alias Golu Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC1792; 1991CriLJ2483; JT1991(3)SC46; 1991(2)SCALE17; (1991)3SCC498; [1991]2SCR858

..... culminates by a judgment pronounced in accordance with law after the judical function thus ends the executive function of giving effect to the judicial verdict commences we first refer to the statutory ..... exceeding 14 years chapter xxxii of the code to which section 433a was added entitled execution suspension remission and commutation of sentences contains sections 432 and 433 which have relevance .....

Airports Auth. Vs. Citizens for Noise Abatement

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the challenged statute authorized two legislators to perform page 501 u s 275 the executive function of controlling the management of the government owned corporations the court held the statutes ..... the arrangement under challenge has also been approved by what are functionally two state legislatures and two state executives since the compelling constitutional reasons on which we have relied in .....

R.K. Mittal and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 45(1991)DLT589; (1992)IILLJ428Del

..... interpreting the rule was an executive act and not a legislative function the rule making function is a legislative function but interpretation of the rule by executive decision is an executive function for 27 years rule was .....

Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai Vs. Special Area Development Authority, Bhi ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1991MP332; 1991(0)MPLJ790

..... the government in the exercise of its governmental public or executive functions and the doctrine of executive necessity or freedom of future executive action cannot be invoked to defeat the applicability of the ..... mention in the memo of appeal filed before the district judge that the chief executive officer sada omitted to decide certain objections pressed before him it therefore appears probable .....