Skip to content


Executive Function - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: executive function Year: 1989 Page 1 of about 364 results (0.164 seconds)
Dec 26 1989 (HC)

T.R. Mishra and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-26-1989

Reported in: (1990)2GLR1103

..... constituted by the state and are invested with judicial as distinguished from purely administrative or executive functions in this decision it has been clearly brought out that the said inherent judicial ..... implement the directive principle of state policy to separate the labour judiciary from the executive earlier the better xv labour courts are having some powers of magistrates and therefore they .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 1989 (FN)

Mistretta Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-18-1989

..... whether congress unconstitutionally has limited the president s authority to remove officials engaged in executive functions or has reserved for itself excessive removal power over such officials see morrison v ..... id at 478 u s 726 to permit congress to remove an officer performing executive functions whenever congress might find the performance of his duties unsatisfactory would in essence give .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 1989 (HC)

Siddha Raj Dhadda Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jun-02-1989

Reported in: AIR1990Raj34; 1989(2)WLN63

..... on the ground that basically and primarily it is an executive function and even the court could not intervene in such matters ..... the court certainly can and must intervene and compel the executive to carry out its constitutional and legal obligations no doubt ..... court said that the court cannot even indirectly require the executive to introduce a particular legislation or the legislature to pass .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 08 1989 (HC)

S. Vasudeva and Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-08-1989

Reported in: ILR1989KAR39

..... subordinate officer of the state government he may have an independent statutory executive function to discharge but while discharging his executive functions under any statute he cannot ignore the facts recognised as in existence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 1989 (HC)

Dhar Cement Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-04-1989

Reported in: 1991(54)ELT178(MP)

..... of haryana air 1980 sc 768 it was held that in the field of purely executive functions of the state the doctrine of promissory estoppel is applicable 23 in the year 1986 ..... against the government in the exercise of its governmental public or executive functions and the doctrine of executive necessity or freedom of future executive action cannot be invoked to defeat the applicability of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 1989 (HC)

Krishan Singh Kundu Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-31-1989

Reported in: 1989CriLJ1309

..... granting the consent would normally mean that the court has to satisfy itself that the executive function of the public prosecutor has not been improperly exercised or that it is not an ..... identical and squarely applicable to the facts of the present case there also by an executive order the state government placed the assistant public prosecutors under the administrative and disciplinary control .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 1989 (HC)

Maduraj City Liquors Dealers Association Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and O ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-27-1989

Reported in: AIR1990Mad220

..... against the government in the exercise of its governmental public or executive functions and the doctrine of executive necessity or freedom of future executive action cannot be invoked to defeat the applicability of the ..... plea of promissory esloppel is not available o a party against a legislative or sovereign function a division bench of this court in jamai m company represented by maksood hasan v .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 1989 (HC)

Mahabir Auto Stores and ors. Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-09-1989

Reported in: AIR1989Delhi315a; ILR1989Delhi255

..... making of contracts for any purpose the state can carry on executive function by making a law or without awaking a law the ..... context the supreme court observed underarticle 298 of the constitution the executive power of the union and the state shall extend to ..... of natural justice arc attached to the performance of certain functions regulated by statutes or rules made there under involving decisions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 1989 (HC)

Malkiyat Singh Vs. Delhi Administration and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-1989

Reported in: ILR1989Delhi637

..... code of criminal procedure 1898 as amended by the union territories separation of judicial and executive functions act 1969 it was directed that as such he shall have all the powers of ..... exercising the powers of a magistrate by whatever designation the chief officer charged with such executive administration is styled thus the words magistrate of the district are synonymous with words district .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 03 1989 (HC)

Malkiyat Singh Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-03-1989

Reported in: 1989CriLJ1112

..... code of criminal procedure 1898 as amended by the union territories separation of judicial and executive functions act 1969 it was directed that as such he shall have all the powers of ..... exercising the powers of a magistrate by whatever designation the chief officer charged with such executive administration is styled thus the words magistrate of the district are synonymous with words district .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //