Executive Function - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: executive function Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 295 results (0.149 seconds)Jit Ram Shiv Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-16-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC1285; (1981)1SCC11; [1980]3SCR689
..... that the plea of estoppel is not available against the government and its legislative or executive functions except for preventing fraud or manifest injustice 36 it was submitted that the cases cited ..... of promissory estoppel is applicable against the state acting in exercise of its legislative or executive function is turner morrison and co ltd v hungerford investment trust ltd 1972 85itr607 sc supra .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.R. Singh Vs. Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Gujarat and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-11-1980
Reported in: (1981)22GLR876
..... 26 the reason is that neither the president nor the governor exercises the executive functions individually or personally executive action taken in the name of the president is the action of the ..... legislative in character neither the president nor the governor is to exercise the executive functions personally the majority court considered whether the principles enunciated by the supreme court in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaru Ram and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-11-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC2147; 1980CriLJ1440; (1981)1SCC107; [1981]1SCR1196
..... by law a pardon is the remission of such punishment both are the exercise of executive functions and should be distinguished from the exercise of judicial power over sentences the judicial power ..... distinguishable observed justice sutherland to render a judgment is a judicial function to carry the judgment into effect is an executive function to cut short a sentence by an act of clemency is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajender Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. State Through Special Police Establis ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-02-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC1510; 1980CriLJ1084; (1980)3SCC435; [1980]3SCR982
..... granting the consent would normally mean that the court has to satisfy itself that the executive function of the public prosecutor has not been improperly exercised or that it is not an ..... while reiterating decision that the court granting permission for withdrawal should satisfy itself that the executive function of the public prosecutor has not been improperly exercised and that it is not an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Punjab Vs. Gurdip Singh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-05-1980
Reported in: 1980CriLJ1027
..... granting the consent should normally mean that the court has to satisfy itself that the executive function of the public prosecutor has not been improperly exercised or that it is not an ..... justice for illegitimate reasons or purposes whereas in the aforesaid case the functions of public prosecutor were taken to be executive but in subhash chander s case 1980 cri lj 324 sc .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrasanna Dinkar Sohale and Etc. Vs. the Director-in-charge, Laxminaray ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-12-1980
Reported in: AIR1982Bom176
..... learned chief justice pointed out that the state can carry an executive function by making a law of without making a law the exercise ..... whether it be under authority of law or in exercise of executive power without making of law this principle was recognised and ..... whether it be under authority of law or in exercise of executive power without making of law was clearly discriminatory since it excluded .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGudialabandha Grama Sasan Vs. State of Orissa and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Feb-21-1980
Reported in: AIR1981Ori40
..... it thinks fit and howsoever obtained in the course of its executive functions or derived from the evidence at an enquiry if there is ..... year 1968 and that the cattle market at dukura has been functioning on each saturday for the last many years it is also ..... commissioner under section 146 2 of the article the powers and functions of the zilla parishad having devolved on the collector after abolition .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Mansukhram and Sons Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-i
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Mar-14-1980
Reported in: (1980)19CTR(Guj)117; [1982]133ITR65(Guj)
..... 147 b and came to the conclusion that since those authorities perform essentially administrative or executive functions and cannot be attributed the powers of judicial supervision over the quasi judicial acts of income .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.V. Mahalinga Iyer Vs. State of Madras and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-06-1980
Reported in: AIR1980SC2036; (1981)1SCC445; 1980(12)LC865(SC)
..... 48 approved article 258 1 empowers the president to entrust to the state only such executive functions as are vested in the union and are exercisable by him on its behalf it ..... giving the president the power to entrust his functions it is contemplating the entrustment of the executive functions of the union only and no other the functions occurring in the article even if not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagdish Chandra Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-07-1980
Reported in: AIR1981SC1233; 1981CriLJ739; (1982)1SCC350
..... activities act 1974 contended that in the matter of discharge of executive functions conferred upon him the administrator of the union territory of goa ..... 46 2 of the union territories act 1963 provides that all executive action of the administrator whether taken on the advice of ..... or where he is not exercising any judicial or quasi judicial functions is not bound to act according to the advice of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial