Evening - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: evening Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.083 seconds)Cce Vs. Steel Strips Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-03-2006
Reported in: (2006)(105)ECC489
..... on merit they cannot challenge the order on merits before me as they have not even filed cross objection hence the confirmation of the duty on them is correct and is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCrompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Ep)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-01-2006
..... prove that they were entitled to the deec benefit on the basis of details available even though the goods have been exported without claiming any export benefit 6 heard shri s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Customs Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-05-2006
Reported in: (2006)(109)ECC575
..... hon ble supreme court as the appellate authority observed that as per the said decisions even though the doctrine of unjust enrichment will apply incase of imported goods used captively in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMazagon Dock Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-04-2006
..... appellants claimed the benefit of concessional rate of duty as provided for in the notification even at the time of seeking clearance of the goods and undertook to produce essentiality certificate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAgarwal Trading Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-03-2006
..... period december 1999 to june 2001 and thereafter in june 2002 and september 2002 therefore even if there was a dispute between the clearing agent and the company once the clearing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarmada Sugars Pvt. Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2006
..... that the stay application was fixed for hearing on 17th february 1992 it appears that even after such intimation the officers had encashed the bank guarantee on 3rd february 1992 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe General Manager Vehicle Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2006
Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC572
..... their outer movement are not maintained in vfj being defence establishment extreme care is exercised even for minute things therefore no allegation of misleading and intentional evasion of duty can at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHonda Siel Power Products Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2006
Reported in: (2006)(109)ECC654
..... from cenvat account it was paying duty erroneously on other items from current account pla even as those products were required to discharge duty only from cenvat account it is the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFenil Udyog Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-01-2006
..... a similar view has been taken 3 the learned j d r however submits that even though the statement is retracted by one of the partner it was not done or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSandur Laminates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: May-05-2006
..... that the rom application is by no means an appeal in disguise whereby an order even if it is not valid is reheard and re decided in the dinkar khindria case .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial