Evening - Year 2002 - Judgments

Jan 01 2002 (TRI)

Mangalore Refinery and Vs. C.C.E., Bangalore

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jan-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT247Tri(Bang.)

..... of imported goods under section 45 or a complete remission as permissible under section 23 even in these cases of section 13 or and section 23 the importer may be liable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Vinay Kumar

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT467Tri(Mum.)bai

..... partial exemption to tmbp coils imported for the manufacture of electrolytic tin plate is available even if some quantity of scrap is generated in the process is directly applicable to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2002 (TRI)

Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: May-17-2002

Reported in: (2002)(81)ECC811

..... manufacture of the finished product modvat credit as such cannot be extended he said that even after amendment to rule 57 q the tribunal has taken a view in the case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Binny Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-17-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC774

..... by the respondent to the department the ratio that the extended time limit is applicable even if the price lists are approved in the cases where full information at the time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 2002 (TRI)

Carrier Aircon Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2002

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC562

..... payable by the concessionaire applicant who was the buyer of the goods it is not even explained by the assistant collector why no proceedings have been made to recover the duty .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Shasun Chemicals and Drugs Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC770

..... this case 5 we have carefully considered the submissions made before us we notice that even on the question of confirming of demands with regard to the violation of deec scheme .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Expo Globe India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2003)(152)ELT216TriDel

..... his communication dated 16 8 2001 a copy of which was provided to the appellants even if one gives due margin to the contention of the party against the allegation of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Cc Vs. K.R. Steel Union Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)(104)LC1056Tri(Mum.)bai

..... partial exemption to tmbp coils imported for the manufacture of electrolytic tin plate is available even if some quantity of scrap is generated in the process is directly applicable to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2002 (TRI)

Shivani Locks Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-14-2002

Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT383TriDel

..... by the commissioner appeals before simply affirming the order in original of the additional commissioner even the additional commissioner has not in the order in original referred to these cases before .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 20 2002 (TRI)

Transpek Industry Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-20-2002

Reported in: (2002)(146)ELT423Tri(Mum.)bai

..... is to be taken as the basis of value under section 4 of the cea even for the goods sold from depots the adjudicating authority has gone by the decision of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Evening - Judgment Search Results