Skip to content


Evening - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: evening Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.086 seconds)
Sep 19 2001 (HC)

S.C. Bajpai Vs. Shahid Bhagat Singh (Evening) College and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-19-2001

Reported in: 95(2002)DLT336

..... not to have been placed in a saving bank account even if ignoring the argument made by learned counsel appearing for ..... no authority vested in the corporation for continuing the departmental enquiry even for the purpose of imposing any reduction in the retiral ..... the disputes in question that application had been rejected in liming even if ignoring the argument made by learned counsel appearing for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 2001 (TRI)

Tide Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-22-2001

Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT426Tri(Mum.)bai

..... appealed have been found to be correct by the department should be ignored is not even attempted to be answered by him we would strongly advise the departmental authorities that when .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Standard Niwar Mills Vs. Cce, Kanpur

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2001

Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT150TriDel

..... cannot be dried from the machine if the wet cloth is passed and that not even the lighter cloth could be dried up in the machine the learned sdr further showed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Telephone Cables Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2001

Reported in: (2001)(135)ELT729TriDel

..... lube used as lubricant did not fall within the definition of capital goods the lubricants even otherwise also are not machines machinery or component or spare parts etc therefore the modvat .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner, Central Excise, Vs. M/S. Indian Acrylic Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-23-2001

..... be entitled to modvat credit it is further observed that not only complete machinery but even their components spare parts would be entitled to the modvat credit as capital goods provided .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Shivom Ply-n-wood Pvt. Ltd, Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise an ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-22-2001

Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT435Tri(Mum.)bai

..... is the ultimate loser where they lose patience and proceed to decide the case ex parte even where the case is very strong against the assessee any lacuna left in following the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 2001 (TRI)

Bombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-22-2001

Reported in: (2001)(96)LC432Tri(Mum.)bai

..... conditions required to be satisfied by the notifications have not been satisfied by the appellants even no attempt was made by the appellants to establish the existence of circumstances entitling them .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 2001 (TRI)

Shri Manishkumar Bagdawala, Shri Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise an ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-22-2001

..... been made by the revenue to show the method by which short levy was made even if a very small number of traders have admitted the fact that certain goods were .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 2001 (TRI)

Shri Sandeep Bhaskar Vs. Commissioner of Customs, New

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-22-2001

..... a deposit of rs 50 000 it is observed that the appellant has not made even a partial pre deposit of the above stated amount i see no reason to extend .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Unique Pharmaceutical Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-23-2001

Reported in: (2001)(135)ELT1160Tri(Mum.)bai

..... have been contested by the department officers and differential duty recovered from the appellant without even issue of basic scn and the appellant had contested this ad hoc recovery and filed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //