Evening - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: evening Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.032 seconds)Woodby Vs. Ins
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-12-1966
..... stat 656 1961 8 u s c 1481 c footnote 18 this standard or an even higher one has traditionally been imposed in cases involving allegations of civil fraud and in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.P. Sarathy Mudaliar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-21-1966
Reported in: [1966]62ITR576(SC)
..... but the high court has no power to set aside the order of the tribunal even if it is of the view that the tribunal has not considered the question which .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWar Profits Tax Commissioner, Madhya Pradesh, Indore Vs. Binodram Balc ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-20-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC246; [1966]62ITR740(SC); [1966]SuppSCR224
..... that the explanation was not added subsequent to the promulgation of the ordinance 12 but even if it was added subsequently in our opinion the explanation applies to the computation of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore Vs. K.Y. Pilliah and Sons
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-13-1966
Reported in: [1967]63ITR411(SC)
..... exercised not arbitrarily but judicially in the light of relevant materials it is however not even suggested that the income tax officer acted arbitrarily or capriciously in exercising his power to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssociated Clothiers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax Calcutta
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-23-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC788; [1967]63ITR224(SC); [1967]1SCR512
..... out of himself is not applicable to transactions between a person and a limited company even though all the shares in the company are owned by that person because from a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.M. Parikh, Income-tax Officer, Special Investigation Circle-b, Ahmed ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-01-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC823; [1967]63ITR663(SC); [1967]2SCR38
..... if an order under sub s 1 of section 23a was an order of assessment even after the act was amended it was unnecessary to retain clause d in that form .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMiss Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-31-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC614; [1967]63ITR651(SC); [1967]2SCR1
..... as laid down by various authors on the subject to be applied in such situations even if this principle be accepted the amount taxable as capital gain in her hands would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandulal Harjivandas, Jamnagar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujara ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-14-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC816; [1967]63ITR627(SC); [1967]1SCR921
..... high court further held that on the true interpretation of the terms of the contract even if the minor were to be alive on the deferred date it was the assessee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTO. Rm. M. Sp. Sv. Firm Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax-madras
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-14-1966
Reported in: AIR1967SC1061; [1967]63ITR404(SC); [1967]1SCR905
..... sub section 4 of s 25 have been rendered applicable section 25 3 however applies even if the person assessed under the 1918 act was different from the person who claims .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKehar Singh and ors. Vs. Dewan Singh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-21-1966
Reported in: AIR1966SC1555; [1966]3SCR393
..... adoptive father he was not entitled to succeed collaterally in his adoptive father s family even assuming that his adoption was valid this aspect of the matter was not considered by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial