Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employees state insurance amendment act 2010 section 4 amendment of section 10 Page 9 of about 85,205 results (1.906 seconds)

The Employees State Insurance Corporation, Represented by Its Regional ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1984)1MLJ45

..... or suspend or withdraw the scheme altogether at its discretion. on those averments the respondent claimed that the incentive earnings and the ad hoc allowance are not liable to be taken into account for the employees' state insurance coverage or deduction of employees' state insurance subscription. in spite of ..... employees' state insurance contribution, etc. in had been further agreed that the other conditions governing the incentive payment will be published separately. following the same, the said scheme was published on 14th april, 1972, clause (g) of the said scheme was to the effect that the management reserves its right to amend ..... flat ad hoc allowance and incentive earnings under (i) and (ii) above shall not be reckoned for purposes of provident fund, bonus, gratuity, employees, state insurance etc.7. clause 6 of the settlement, which is also relevant, reads as follows-the production and efficiency norms under the productivity scheme are fixed .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Dinesh K. Shah and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1997]223ITR68(Mad)

..... a partner in the firm.' 42. on a comparison of section 86a of the employees' state insurance act with section 278b of the act, it is seen that they are verbatim the same. section 86a of the employees' state insurance act has been inserted by the employees' state insurance (amendment) act 29 of 1989. this provision is analogous to similar provisions contained in various statutes ..... of a company or a partner of a firm be prosecuted as a 'principal employer' falling within the fold of section 2(17) of the employees' state insurance act as it stood prior to its amendment by the central act 29 of 1989, in and by which section 86a of that act was introduced in the said act ..... (amended with effect from october 20, 1989).41. section 86a of the employees' state insurance act reads as follows : '86a. offences by companies.--(1) if the person committing an offence under this act is a company, every person .....

Mettur Beardsell Limited and Ors. Vs. the Employees' State Insurance' ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1973)2MLJ195

..... the administrative office of the company in the address as above. the respondent as the statutory functionary under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 was of the view that by reason of the amendment of the word 'employee' in section 2 (9) of the act, the employees of the petitioner, even, though working in the administrative office as above, would squarely come within the meaning of ..... contention of the learned counsel for the respondent is that this inclusion by reason of the amending act, (xliv of 1966), is purely declaratory of an existing situation. it is also suggested, relying upon a decision reported in hindustan lever ltd. v. employees' state insurance corporation, new delhi (1972) 42 f.j.r. 263, that the said paragraph is only clarificatory of the quondam .....

Shalimar Chemical Works Private Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1987)65CTR(Cal)218,[1987]167ITR13(Cal)

..... high courts of calcutta and delhi upheld the validity of the extended provision of the employees' state insurance act that the employees' state insurance authorities revived their demand under the amended provision and called upon the assessee to comply with the demand.16. in the ..... amending legislation in different high courts. subsequently, the high courts of calcutta and delhi rejected the contentions of the employers and held that all categories of employees mentioned in the substituted section 2(9) of the employees' state insurance act would be employees within the meaning of the said act. the high court at madras and the employees' insurance court, bombay, took a different view and the employees' state insurance ..... . the assessee came within the mischief of the substituted section 2(9) of the employees' state insurance act and became liable to contribute for such insurance to the employees' state insurance corporation on and from january 28, 1968. the assessee, however, did not make .....

Niky Tasha (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Regional P.F. Commissioner and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR168]; (1995)ILLJ282P& H; (1994)108PLR55

..... under clause (d) deferment of provident fund /waiver of penalties, income-tax and employees state insurance dues and collection after suitable rephasing should ensure at the same time that there is no deprivation of benefits to the retiring or sick employees. thus, thereby, it is pleaded, the petitioner is entitled to the benefits under ..... has opposed the relief asked for by the petitioner and in its written statement by way of preliminary objections it is stated that the employees provident funds and misc. provisions act, 1952 ( as amended up to date) and the scheme framed thereunder is a social welfare legislation enacted with the object of making some ..... , niky tasha (india) pvt. ltd., in the petition which was amended during its pendency, seeks declaring and consequently setting aside proviso to section 14b of the amended employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952, as also section 1(2) of the amending act 1988 as ultra vires and violative of articles 14 and 19(1 .....

Bombay Ammonia Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation and ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 44(1991)DLT481; [1991(63)FLR866]; 1991LabIC1893; (1995)IIILLJ848Del; 1991RLR437

..... been well considered in the judgment of the andhra pradesh high court, reported as 1973(27) if lr 49, m/s. southern roadways (pvt.) ltd. v. employees state insurance corporation through its regional director, hyderabad, where it was held that the obligation to make contribution is not dependent upon the fact whether or not the employers received any ..... be made. (11) i find this plea to be not tenable at all for the short reason that the definition of 'employee' under section 2(9) as amended with effect from 28th january, 1968, encompasses all employees, employed by the principal employer : 'on any work of, or incidental or preliminary to or connected with the work of, ..... three high courts of andbra pradesh, madras and calcutta were upheld, for the reason that under the extended definition of section 2(9) of the amended act the expression 'employee', was no longer confined to those actually working in the factory. the judgment of the andhra pradesh high court out of which one of the appeals .....

Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja Advocate Vs. Baby and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... act, 1923 (8 of 1923).or any other law for the time being in force or otherwise, in respect of an employment injury sustained by the insured person as an employee under this act.) . by the employees' state insurance (amendment) act, 2010 (18 of 2010) introduced on the statute book w.e.f.01st june, 2010 a right is conferred on the workman to claim compensation ..... for injury and right on the claimants on account of death of the insured person/workman in accidents happening while commuting to the place of work or vice versa. the newly .....

N.T. Kate, Insurance Inspector, E.S.i. Corpn. Vs. Yogendra Swarup Agar ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)497; [2003(96)FLR393]; (2003)ILLJ406Bom; 2003(1)MhLj145

..... a breach of the statutory rule.'9. after taking into consideration the legal position, the learned single judge of the karnataka high court has observed in the case of employees state insurance corporation, bangalore v. bangalore engineers industry, reported in 2001 (1) clr 372. in an exhaustive judgment, the learned single judge (justice saldanha) has pointed in para ..... with the scheme declared by the government. a.b. palkar, j.1. all these appeals are filed against the order of acquittal by the insurance inspector on behalf of the employees state insurance corporation (for short 'esic').2. respondent no. 1 i.e. yogendra swarup agarwal was prosecuted under section 85(a) of the e.s.i. act and different ..... are concerned is actionable and if a notice has been issued to the defaulter, it will be obligatory on the part of the defaulter to either make amends or at that point of time to point out in writing within the prescribed period, that the amount has either been paid or if there is any .....

Regional Director, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. Kumar St ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2004(3)ALLMR887; [2004(102)FLR754]; (2004)IIILLJ415Bom; 2004(3)MhLj102

..... e.s.i. dues amounting to more than a lac of rupees besides many other outstanding statutory dues and ultimately requested to consider the case sympathetically. the regional director, employees state insurance corporation on receipt of the said reply, directed the respondent no. 1 to represent their case in person before him on 10-2-1985. the record further shows that ..... law. liberty is given and the said ground is accepted to be a ground involving the substantial questions of law. the learned advocate for the appellant is accordingly permitted to amend the memo of appeal and the separate order is also passed on the said exh. 'x'. the said ground is reproduced hereinbelow :--ground no. 4:-- whether the trial ..... , as a ground involving the substantial questions of law. on hearing the advocate appearing for the respondent, leave granted. the learned advocate for the appellant is permitted to amend the appeal memo accordingly within a period of one week from today.appeal is dismissed accordingly.

A.P. State Electricity Board Vs. E.S.i.C.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1978)ILLJ44AP

..... factory within the meaning of section 2(12) of the employees' state insurance (amendment) act, 1975, referred to in this judgment as 'the act' and whether the employees' contribution and employers' special contribution can be levied against them by the employees' state insurance corporation.2. the facts found by the employees' insurance court in cases nos. 4 and 5 of 1975, out ..... merely those who worked without any wages or remuneration. but as far as the question before us is concerned, we do not think that the amendment makes any difference.8 in employees' state insurance corporation v. m.a.h. siddique 1965--i l.l.j 573 : a.i.r. 1965 mys. 71, it was held that ..... 'factory' falling within the definition, it being immaterial whether these persons so working are paid wages or not.9. in chanan singh and sons v. employees' state insurance corporation , it was held that a principal employer being a person who actively works on the premises must be included in the figure of twenty referred to .....