Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employees state insurance amendment act 2010 section 4 amendment of section 10 Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 3,469 results (0.174 seconds)

Employees' State Insurance Corporation, Chandigarh Vs. Dalmia Dadri Ce ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1972P& H414

..... not maintainable since section 66 of the act had been repealed by the employees' state insurance (amendment) act no. 44 of 1966 (hereinafter called the amending act), before the making of the application.2. in short, the case of the appellant is that it is employees' state insurance corporation, and respondent no. 1 in factory within the meaning of the ..... the application was bad on account of misjoinder of parties and was not cognizable by the employees' state insurance court and was not maintainable, since section 66 and section 75(2)(c) of the act had been repealed by the amending act before the appellant moved the application. the objection that the application was not maintainable ..... judgment of the high court of madhya pradesh passed on 25-3-1969, in employees' state insurance corporation, jabalpur v. s. p. nanwati, misc. first appeal no. 87 of 1968 (madh. pra) and argued that section 43 of the amending act did not abrogate the right of the appellant to claim actuarial present value of .....

Swastika Woollens Vs. Presiding Officer, Employees Provident Fund Appe ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)ILLJ241P& H

..... initiation of action under section 14-b of the act is clearly discernible from the fact that by the employees state insurance amendment act no.29 of 1989. section 77(1)(b) of the principal act has been amended and five years have been prescribed as period of limitation for recovery of contributions (including interest and damages ..... ) by the employees state insurance corporation, but no such amendment has been made in section 14-b of the act (19 of 1952) incorporating the period of limitation for recovery of ..... accord sanction for the levy and recovery of rs. 1,42,291/- for the delayed payment of provident fund contributions. family pension/employees pension fund contributions. administrative charges and employees deposit linked insurance contributions and admn. charges.' 5. the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the levy of damages was dismissed by respondent no. .....

Employees' State Insurance Corporation and Anr. Vs. Enkay (India) Rubb ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1998)IIILLJ172P& H; (1997)115PLR583

..... the definition of 'employees' was extended to such persons employed for wages on any work connected with the administration of the factory or establishment ..... learned counsel that sales staff were regularly employed and paid by the petitioner-respondent. in employees' state insurance corporation v. t.c. vermanl 1985(1) indian law reporter (punjab and haryana), 94, this high court has held that 'a reading of section 2(9) of the employees' state insurance act, 1948 as amended by act 44 of 1966 (w.e.f. january 28, 1968) would show that .....

Niky Tasha (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Regional P.F. Commissioner and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR168]; (1995)ILLJ282P& H; (1994)108PLR55

..... under clause (d) deferment of provident fund /waiver of penalties, income-tax and employees state insurance dues and collection after suitable rephasing should ensure at the same time that there is no deprivation of benefits to the retiring or sick employees. thus, thereby, it is pleaded, the petitioner is entitled to the benefits under ..... has opposed the relief asked for by the petitioner and in its written statement by way of preliminary objections it is stated that the employees provident funds and misc. provisions act, 1952 ( as amended up to date) and the scheme framed thereunder is a social welfare legislation enacted with the object of making some ..... , niky tasha (india) pvt. ltd., in the petition which was amended during its pendency, seeks declaring and consequently setting aside proviso to section 14b of the amended employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952, as also section 1(2) of the amending act 1988 as ultra vires and violative of articles 14 and 19(1 .....

Present: Mr. Harkesh Manuja Advocate Vs. Baby and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... act, 1923 (8 of 1923).or any other law for the time being in force or otherwise, in respect of an employment injury sustained by the insured person as an employee under this act.) . by the employees' state insurance (amendment) act, 2010 (18 of 2010) introduced on the statute book w.e.f.01st june, 2010 a right is conferred on the workman to claim compensation ..... for injury and right on the claimants on account of death of the insured person/workman in accidents happening while commuting to the place of work or vice versa. the newly .....

Manpreet Kaur (Minor) and Ors. Vs. Assistant Labour Commissioner for W ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1997ACJ164; (1996)114PLR564

..... under any other law for the time being in force or otherwise in respect of an employment injury sustained by the insured person as an employee under this act. section 61 of the employees' state insurance (amendment) act, 1989 provides that 'when a person is entitled to any of the benefits provided by this act, he ..... . 2 on 2.12.1986. all these claimants are getting pension and other benefits under the provisions of employees' state insurance act, 1948. he vehemently argued that under sections 53 and 61 of the employees' state insurance act (amendment act) 1989, claimants are not entitled to claim compensation or damages under the workmen's compensation act, 1923 ..... receive any similar benefit admissible under the provisions of any other enactment.'thus, it is obvious that once the claimants have received benefits under the employees' state insurance act, 1948 which is not disputed before me, they are not entitled to claim any compensation either under the workmen's compensation act or under .....

Nipha Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ789P& H

..... the same wage period, the contribution shall fall due on such dates as may be specified in the employees' state insurance (general) regulations, 1950 (for short, the regulations), sub-section (5)(a) which was inserted by amending act no. 29 of 1989 lays down that if any contribution payable under the act is not paid ..... support of his contention, shri sharma relied on the decision of single bench of calcutta high court in sarat textiles ltd. v. jt. regional director, employees state insurance corporation, 2001-ii-llj-744. 3. the regional director rejected the plea put forward on behalf of the petitioner and held that delay in the payment of ..... j. 1. this is a petition for quashing order dated december 18, 2002 passed by the regional director of the employees' state insurance corporation (for short, the corporation) for levy of damages under section 85-b the employees' state insurance act, 1948 (for short, the act). 2. the petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing of machinery, it is covered .....

United India Timber Works and Anr. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corp ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H166; [1967(14)FLR439]; (1967)IILLJ558P& H

..... which came up before me sitting in sngle bench, reliance on behalf of the respondent was placed on a bench decision of the madhya pradesh high court in employees' state insurance corporation v. madhya pradesh government, since reported as air 1964 madh pra 75, and it was submitted that the various aspects which call for consideration for determining ..... advocate general appearing in pursuance of our notice has drawn our attention to a recent bench decision of the madras high court in solar works, madras 1 v. employees' state insurance corporation, madras air 1964 mad 876, in which overruling an earlier decision of a learned single judge of that court, rule 17 has been held to be ..... of the punjab betterment charges and acreage rates act, ii of 1953.4. section 3(h) of the punjab professions, trades, callings and employments taxation (amendment) act 10 of 1962, amending section 11 of the punjab act 7 of 1956, and5. section 9(c) of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act xi of 1952.9. shri tirath .....

Chanan Dass Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1968P& H529

..... earliest opportunity. the following observations made in satyadhyan ghosal's case, air 1960 sc 941 therefore, did not apply either to the instant case or the employees' state insurance corporation case, 1967 cur lj 329:--'the principle of res judicata applies also as between two stages in the same litigation to this extent that a court, ..... heard by the chief settlement commissioner, but after the stage of the appeal in this case, the rule had been amended as stated above. the chief settlement commissioner was, therefore, of the opinion that the amended rule applied to the competing claimants, the appellant and godha ram respondent 3. so he decided in favour of ..... applications under section 24 of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act (44 of 1954), which were pending before the chief settlement commissioner at the time of the amendment of rule 30; (ii) that the said decision of the division bench, dated february 19, 1964, cannot be equated to what is commonly known as an ' .....

Gupta Brothers Conduit Pipe Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Regional Di ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)ILLJ419P& H

..... out that the mistake in not impleading the juristic entity is purely unintentional, inadvertent and, thus, the appellant should be allowed to amend the petition so as to implead the employees' state insurance corporation through its regional director. notice of the application was issued. however, no reply to such application has been filed. it is ..... party respondent. the application has been filed only against the regional director, employees' state insurance corporation who is not a juristic entity.3. in this appeal, the appellant has moved an application bearing c.m. no. 646-cii of 1987, for amendment of the petition under section 75 of the act. the said application was ..... be corrected by the appellant.5. in view of the above, application to implead proper parties under section 75 of the act, is allowed. the employees' state insurance corporation is impleaded as respondent.6. on merits of the controversy, the finding has been recorded that the appellant was not given any opportunity of .....