Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employees state insurance amendment act 2010 section 4 amendment of section 10 Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 4,233 results (0.188 seconds)

Jan 23 2012 (TRI)

The Branch Manager the New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Smt M. Lalitham ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... . in consideration of the payment of an additional premium as stated in the schedule, it is hereby understood and agreed that notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary the company shall indemnify the insured against his legal liability under the workmens compensation act, 1923 and subsequent amendments of that act prior to the date of this endorsement, ..... had rejected the similar claim in f.a.no.273 of 2010, royal sundaram alliance insurance company ltd and others vs konduru lakshmi and others decided on 28-07-2011 wherein it was held that the legal heirs of the deceased employee have to proceed under the provisions of the workmens compensation act . it was held ..... therein that the liability of the insurance company arises in terms of section 4 of the policy for personal accident of owner when he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2015 (HC)

R.C.C.(Sales) Private Limited and Ano Vs. E.S.I. Corporation andot

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... pay fine.23. we would also like to have a glance at the regulations made in exercise of the powers conferred by section 97 of the esi act, namely, the employees state insurance (general) regulations, 1950 (for short the regulations). the regulations provide for the procedure for collection of contributions for extending the benefits and/or deciding ..... of raw- materials for, or the distribution or sale of the products of the factory or establishments, was included in the definition of employee. again in 1989 this provision was amended and it was further expanded and any person engaged as an apprentice, not being an apprentice engaged under the apprentices act, 1961 (act ..... by act no.29 of 1989 even a person engaged as an apprentice was also included excluding an apprentice engaged under the apprentices act, 1961. before the amendment by act 18 of 2010 any person engaged as an apprentice not being an apprentice under the standing orders of the establishment was also included. that inclusion .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2004 (HC)

Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs. A.P. Heavy Machinery and En ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(2)ALD(Cri)219; IV(2005)BC171; 2005CriLJ1080

..... ) the wage period in relation to an employee shall be the unit in respect of which all contributions shall be payable under this act.(4) the contributions payable in respect of each wage ..... payable by the employee (hereinafter referred to as the employee's contribution) and shall be paid to the corporation.(2) the contributions shall be paid at such rates as may be prescribed by the central government :provided that the rates so prescribed shall not be more than the rates which were in force immediately before the commencement of the employees state insurance (amendment) act, 1989.(3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1999 (HC)

New India Assurance Company Limited, Mahaboobnagar Vs. Kistamma and Ot ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001ACJ516; 1999(6)ALD712; 1999(6)ALT796

..... . but in para 12 of th judgment ihe supreme court discussed about scope of section 51-c of employees state insurance (amendment) act, 1966 wherein it is. stated that, 'the deeming provision of section 51-c, which came into force by way of an amendment effected by the employees' state insurance (amendment) act, 1966 (44 of 1966), enlarged the scope of the phrase 'in the course of employment' to include ..... of work. therefore the accident was occurred during the course of employment which comes within the scope and ambit of section 51-c of employees' state insurance (amendment) act, 1966. hence the respondents are liable to pay compensation as insured and insurer of the tractor which involved in the accident. therefore, the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is negatived and the decision relied .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1998 (HC)

Souther Agencies Vs. Andhra Pradesh Employees State Insurance Corporat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD15; 1998(2)ALT731

..... issue arises whether in fact such a definition as provided under the shop act is to be engrafted on to the employees' state insurance act in the matter of applicability of the employees' state insurance act to an establishment or the ordinary english meaning ought to be attributed therein without taking recourse to the meaning attributed ..... necessary for the factory and for augmenting of revenue of the concerned. the legislative clarification as introduced by way of an amendment clarifies the situation to the effect that the word 'employee' should be understood to mean alsoa person, who is employed for wages in regard to any work connected with the ..... the tenth session of the international labour conference of the international labour organisation, this beneficial piece of legislation, however, owes its effectiveness to the various amendments effected from time to time so as to meet the requirements and necessities of changing structure of the society and to subserve the basic intent of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2007 (HC)

Employees State Insurance Corporation Vs. Sri Lakshmi Tulasi Granites ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)ALD725; 2007(5)ALT389; [2007(115)FLR130]; (2007)IIILLJ1018AP

..... and allowed the petition as prayed for directing the parties to bear their own costs. aggrieved by the same, the first respondent in opno. 118 of 1994 aforesaid, employees' state insurance corporation represented by its regional director, had preferred the present civil miscellaneous appeal.3. contentions of sri b.g. reminder reddy : sri b.g. ravinder reddy, learned ..... -1979 till 9/87 is barred under the proviso to explanation (b) clause (1a) of section 77(1) of esi act, as amended by act 28/89.3. the petitioner establishment is not covered by provisions of esi act.16. as already referred to supra, neither the proprietrix nor husband of the proprietrix had been examined and the brother of ..... the provisions of sections 45-b, 75 and 77 as they stood prior to the amendment of the act by the amendment act 28 of 1989 reveal that the cause of action for contribution would arise only after the decision by the insurance court in the proceedings is laid under section 75 of the act. until then, cause .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2004 (HC)

E.S.i. Corporation Vs. Chitivalasah Jute Mills

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(1)ALT331; (2005)IILLJ203AP

..... and the supreme court in model mills' case (1 supra), the same does not hold good with reference to the amended provisions.9. reliance is placed upon a full bench judgment of the kerala high court in employees state insurance corporation v. malabar cashewnut and allied products, 1993-i llj kerala 598 (f.b.). the kerala high court held that ..... l. narasimha reddy, j.1. common questions of fact and law are involved in both these civil miscellaneous appeals filed under section 82 of the employees' state insurance act, 1948 (for short 'the act'). hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment.2. the parties are common to both the appeals. the esi ..... the definition of 'wages' takes in its fold four kinds of payments, viz., (1) remuneration paid in cash to an employee in terms of the contract, (2) any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2004 (HC)

Esi Corporation Vs. Chitavalasah Jute Mills and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD848; [2005(106)FLR74]

..... court and the supreme court in model mills' case (supra), the same does not hold good with reference to the amended provisions.9. reliance is placed upon a full bench judgment of the kerala high court in employees state insurance corporation v. malabar cashewnut and allied products, 1993 illj kerala 598. the kerala high court held that the definition ..... l. narasimha reddy, j.1. common questions of fact and law are involved in both these civil miscellaneous appeals filed under section 82 of the employees' state insurance act, 1948 (for short 'the act'). hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment.2. the parties are common to both the appeals. ..... of 'wages' takes in its fold four kinds of payments, viz., (1) remuneration paid in cash to an employee in terms of the contract, (2) any payment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1977 (HC)

A.P. State Electricity Board Vs. E.S.i.C.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (1978)ILLJ44AP

..... factory within the meaning of section 2(12) of the employees' state insurance (amendment) act, 1975, referred to in this judgment as 'the act' and whether the employees' contribution and employers' special contribution can be levied against them by the employees' state insurance corporation.2. the facts found by the employees' insurance court in cases nos. 4 and 5 of 1975, out ..... merely those who worked without any wages or remuneration. but as far as the question before us is concerned, we do not think that the amendment makes any difference.8 in employees' state insurance corporation v. m.a.h. siddique 1965--i l.l.j 573 : a.i.r. 1965 mys. 71, it was held that ..... 'factory' falling within the definition, it being immaterial whether these persons so working are paid wages or not.9. in chanan singh and sons v. employees' state insurance corporation , it was held that a principal employer being a person who actively works on the premises must be included in the figure of twenty referred to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2003 (HC)

Udipi Sri Anand Bhavan Vs. Regional Director, Employees' State Insuran ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ647AP

..... in the manufacture of tiffins, coffee etc., by using grinder and bottle cooler operated with power. the authorities under the employees' state insurance act brought the appellant hotel within the purview of the employees' state insurance (amendment) act, 1989 ('the act' for brevity) informing that it was provisionally brought within the purview of the act with effect ..... order by holding that the appellant hotel does not come within the purview of the act.4. according to the respondents, the inspector of the employees' state insurance corporation inspected the hotel on october 8, 1990 and noticed that on october 1, 1990 the appellant engaged more than ten persons in preparing tiffins, ..... find an answer to this point, it would be appropriate to refer to the evidence adduced by both the parties.10. section 2(12)(a) of the employees' state insurance act, 1948, reads as follows:' definitions. - (12) 'factory' means any premises including the precincts thereof- (a) whereon ten or more persons are .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //