Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employees state insurance amendment act 2010 section 4 amendment of section 10 Court: sebi securities and exchange board of india or securities appellate tribunal sat Page 1 of about 50 results (0.665 seconds)

Maitreya Services Private Limited Lawrence Trade Centre Co-op Hsg. Soc ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... the reserve bank of india act, 1934 (2 of 1934); (iii) being a contract of insurance to which the insurance act, 1938 (4 of 1938), applies; (iv) providing for any scheme, pension scheme or the insurance scheme framed under the employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952); (v) under which deposits ..... or causing to be carried on any venture capital funds or collective investment schemes operating in the securities market immediately before the commencement of the securities laws (amendment) act, 1995, for which no certificate of registration was required prior to such commencement, may continue to operate till such time regulations are made under clause ..... their detailed reply vide letter dated december 20, 2010 in which all accusations levelled against them by the respondent were denied by the appellants. it is stated in the said letter that appellant no. 1 had stopped taking new investment from the public. for the next couple of months sebi moved forward with .....

Guru Teak Investment (Mysore) Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Ind ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2005)64SCL403SAT

..... the reserve bank of india act, 1934 (2 of 1934); "(iii) being a contract of insurance to which the insurance act, 1938 (4 of 1938), applies; "(iv) providing for any scheme, pension scheme or the insurance scheme framed under the employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952); "(v) under which deposits are ..... dated 09/07/2001 was pleased to grant provisional registration under regulation 70(1) read with regulation 71(1) of the regulations. [the previous regulation was amended w.e.f. 01/07/2001]. the respondent imposed 11 conditions while granting provisional registration in order to obtain final registration. the 11 conditions were: (i ..... appellant had taken pains to comply with all the requirements of the respondent. the appellant had also, as can be seen at annexure 't', clearly stated that any other documents are required for the grant of permanent certificate the appellant would furnish the same.17. sebi without even requiring the appellant to furnish .....

Highland Holiday Homes (P.) Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... reserve bank of india act, 1934 (2 of 1934); (iii) being a contract of insurance to which the insurance act, 1938 (4 of 1938), applies; (iv) providing for any scheme, pension scheme or the insurance scheme framed under the employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952); (v) under which deposits ..... or causing to be carried on any venture capital funds or collective investment schemes operating in the securities market immediately before the commencement of the securities laws (amendment) act, 1995, for which no certificate of registration was required prior to such commencement, may continue to operate till such time regulations are made under ..... classic, silver, gold, platinum and diamond. each category of membership reflects the permitted duration of stay for customer availing a particular scheme.it has been stated that in 1996, the appellant decided to expand its business into plantations and decided to embark on growing 'mangium' trees on 49.50 acres of land .....

Surabhi Agro Tech. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... reserve bank of india act, 1934 (2 of 1934); (iii) being a contact of insurance to which the insurance act, 1938 (4 of 1938), applies; (iv) providing for any scheme, pension scheme or the insurance scheme framed under the employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 ( 19 of 1952); (v) under which deposits ..... causing to be carried on any venture capital funds or collective investment schemes operating in the securities market immediately before the commencement of the securities laws (amendment) act, 1995, for which no certificate of registration was required prior to such commencement, may continue to operate till such time regulations are made under ..... the appellant are in the nature of collective investment schemes covered under the sebi (collective investments schemes) regulations 1999 (the regulations). the appellant is stated to be carrying on its activities on an all india basis with properties located in various parts of the country.2. the respondent is a statutory .....

Doogar and Associates Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2003)48SCL115SAT

..... whether the omission by the employee could have been avoided. the adjudicating officer had noted that the text of the announcement was signed and sent to despatch, that the receptionist on hearing the tragic ..... of the receptionist of the doogar & associates." i agree that an employer cannot escape from his obligation to comply with the statutory requirements on the ground that his employee whom the task was entrusted had failed to discharge his/her duties. but then what is to be seen is that employer had acted honestly and diligently and also ..... it clear that since the regulation was found subsequently not of any use and that it was therefore, subsequently amended does not mean that for violation of the same when it was in force, no action is called for. as stated earlier, the fact that the requirement of regulation 15(2) was not complied with is an undisputed fact. .....

Parsoli Corporation Limited and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange Boa ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... of sections 235 to 241 of the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956), it shall be the duty of every manager, managing director, officer and other employee of the company and every intermediary referred to in section 12 or every person associated with the securities market to preserve and to produce to the investigating authority or ..... and (c) the words a penalty of one lakh rupees for each day during which such failure continues or one crore rupees, whichever is less were substituted by amending act 59 of 2002 w.e.f. october 29, 2002 for the words a penalty not exceeding one lakh and fifty thousand rupees for each such failure. the statement ..... that there was non-compliance. the order had been complied with but belatedly. for the delay in complying with the order, parsoli has furnished an explanation. it states that the rta had not transferred the database and electronic connectivity for a sufficiently long time which caused the delay. it has also been pointed out that a .....

M/S. Helios and Matheson Information Technology Limited Vs. Securities ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... to our notice clause 2.2.3 of the spa which provides that if prior approval from fipb could not be obtained the parties had agreed to mutually amend the spa for acquiring the vmoksha entities on a stock swap basis. it is with reference to this clause that the learned counsel for the board strenuously ..... and india. we are looking at an aggressive growth to usd 100 mn revenue in the next 24 months and also at attaining a critical mass of 2000 employees by 2006. we plan to enhance our international competitive position through both organic growth and strategic acquisitions. with the completion of the vmoksha deal, we are well positioned ..... which may influence the decision of the investors and hence is in contravention of the law. the code of corporate disclosure practices for prevention of insider trading as stated in schedule ii read with regulation 12(2) of pit regulations requires that price sensitive information should be given by listed companies to stock exchanges and disseminated .....

Sunil Krishna Khaitan and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... to be reckoned as of the end of the financial year ending on march 31. with respect to this contention of the appellants the respondent states that prior to the amendment of regulation 11(1) as drafted on the basis of the recommendations of the justice bhagwati committee report of 1997, creeping acquisition in any ..... period of 12 months was permitted without incurring the obligation of making a public offer. the reference period provided therein being vague, sebi brought about the amendment of regulations on the basis of the following recommendation of the justice p.n. bhagwati committee report of 2002: the creeping acquisition limit may be reckoned with ..... provide for (h)regulating substantial acquisition of shares and take-over of companies; 19. at this stage, it is necessary to revert to the provisions of the amended sast regulations, 2011 relied upon by the learned wtm in the impugned order are as under:- sast regulations, 2011:- section 3 which deals with substantial acquisition .....

Indiabulls Securities Limited and Others Vs. Securities and Exchange B ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... manipulative trade in the f and o segment and detailing the steps it had taken to check suspicious trades in that segment including issuing necessary instructions to its employees to detect certain specified red alerts and sanitise the system against them and also to the clients cautioning them to desist from raising such alerts. the adjudicating officer ..... of various contracts with different underlying securities wherein one party had booked profit and the other party had booked loss as per the prior understanding between them. the above stated actions amount to non genuine trades and misuse of the stock exchange mechanism and are in violation of regulations 3a, 3b, 3c, 4(1), 4(2)(a ..... and upheld in the impugned order. we have discussed the import of this circular in the case of rakhi trading pvt. ltd. (supra) and for the reasons stated therein we find no merit in citing this circular to establish the charge against the appellant. what we have observed in the case of rakhi trading pvt. ltd. .....

Sms Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in : (2004)49SCL117SAT

..... as to benefit the shareholders. in fact, the intent of the regulation 12 has now been made clear by way of an explanation added vide amendment effected on 9.9.2002 stating that regulation 12 covers direct or indirect acquisition of control. this is only an explanation - an explanation is clarificatory in nature. it does not ..... exercise of the voting rights conferred by the special share. 60. since the completion of the take-over the board of rie had consisted entirely of bat employees. 61. finally there is a striking similarity between the arrangements made to circumvent the control provisions of the master agreement and the examples of circumstances where the ..... holding 11.80% (17.9% voting rights) gaz de france holding 10.90% (16.8% voting rights) total fina holding 6.40% (9.9% voting rights) employees & ors holding 5.90% (2.7% voting rights). the reason for variance in the shareholdings and voting rights was attributed to shares issued with disproportionate voting rights. he submitted .....