Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employees state insurance amendment act 2010 section 4 amendment of section 10 Page 5 of about 85,205 results (0.896 seconds)

E.i.D. Parry (India) Limited Vs. the Regional Director, Tamil Nadu Emp ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)1MLJ261

..... of 1976 inter alia for a declaration that the employees in its head office and branch offices do not come within the amended definition of 'employee'. that petition was filed with reference to the fertilizer factory of ..... for the period from the date of commencement of the amended act 44 of 1966 by which the scope of the definition of 'employee' was enlarged, till the date from which the employer commenced paying the contributions.4. the petitioner employer had filed a petition in the employees, 'state insurance court, madras, e.i.o.p. no. 16 ..... the respondent made on 12.10.1984 under section 45-a of the employees state insurance act, 1948 (central act 34 of 1948) (here-in after referred to as the act) determining the amount of the contributions payable by the petitioner in respect of its employees in the head, regional and branch offices for the period from 28. .....

Sawarmal Agarwalla Vs. State of Assam and anr.

Court : Guwahati

..... hegde and golay ltd. and anr. v. employees state insurance corporation bangalore and. anr. (supra) and employees state insurance corporation, delhi v. masco pvt. ltd. (supra) which mr. bhattacharjee has relied upon. in the face of this specific protection, which by way of amendment has been introduced in the year 1989, it ..... becomes abundantly clear that before a person is asked to make payment of a contribution for an employee or employees ..... needs to be very carefully noted is that the decisions, which mr. bhattacharjee has relied upon, namely, employees' state insurance corporation (supra), hegde and golay ltd. and anr. (supra), employees' state insurance corporation (supra), to support his contention that before prosecution is launched against a person for non-payment of .....

Harihar Polyfibres Vs. Regional Director, Esi Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC1680; (1985)1CompLJ313(SC); 1984(2)Crimes563(SC); [1984(49)FLR371]; (1984)IILLJ475SC; 1984(2)SCALE295; (1984)4SCC324; [1985]1SCR712; 1985(17)LC209(SC)

..... attention was also invited to the case of braithwaite & co. (india) ltd. v. the employees' state insurance corporation : (1968)illj550sc . (v. bhargava and c.a. vaidialingam, jj). the case arose prior to the amendment of the employees' state insurance act in 1966 when the explanation to section 41 was bodily lifted from section 41 into the ..... even if any ambiguity could have been suggested, the expression must be given a liberal interpretation beneficial to the interests of the employees for whose benefit the employees state insurance act has been passed.12. all other aspects including the various decisions of the high courts on this question have been considered ..... learned brother o. chinnappa reddy, j.8. i entirely agree that on true interpretation of the word 'wages' defined in section 2(22) of the employees' state insurance act, 'wages' must necessarily include 'house rent allowance, night shift allowance, heat, gas and dust allowance and incentive allowance'.9. the definition of .....

Regional Director, Employee State Insurance Corp. Vs. Bhavnagar Vegeta ...

Court : Gujarat

..... 6. our attention was also invited to the case of braithwaite and co. (india) ltd. v. the employees' state insurance corporation (v. bhargava and c.a. vaidialingam, jj). the case arose prior to the amendment of the employees' state insurance act in 1966 when the explanation to s. 41 was bodily lifted from s. 41 into the definition of ..... madras has in the case of regional director, (tamilnadu) employees state insurance corporation v. mercury travels limited, reported in 2007 (2) llj 734 observed and held as under: 8. the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has cited ..... my learned brother o. chinnappa reddy, j. 8. i entirely agree that on true interpretation of the word 'wages' defined in s.2(22) of the employees' state insurance act, 'wages' must necessarily include 'house rent allowance, night shift allowance, heat, gas and dust allowance and incentive allowance'. ? 12. high court of .....

P. Asokan Vs. Western India Plywoods Ltd., Cannanore

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1987Ker103; (1987)IILLJ183Ker

..... functioning as the law member of the viceroy's executive council, brought about labour legislations of great sweep and impact. the industrial disputes act, 1947, the employees' state insurance act, 1948 and the industrial employment standing orders act, 1947, were some measures ofthat period. they strived to usher in industrial peace, regulated conditions of employment ..... branches of law should not be lost sight of while we approach the interpretation of a seemingly simple section such as the one contained in the employees' state insurance act, 1948.24. in relation to the interpretation of statutes courts will have a positive role to play. if a section yields two different interpretations ..... the legal proceedings initiated by the indigent person. this is particularly so in view of the change in the language of the relevant clause after the amendment of the code in 1976. the principles contained in the decision in gobardhan das v. raghunandan das, air 1968 orissa 213 (where earlier case law .....

M.M.Rubber Company Ltd. Vs. the Deputy Director and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... cannot be any private negotiations and the interest is an automatic liability on the employer if there were delayed payments. the supreme court in goetze (india) limited v. employees' state insurance corporation reported in 2008 (8) scc 705 had observed as follows: "9.as there was delay in making the payment of the contribution the corporation had issued notice ..... order1. the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to challenge an order, dated 6.12.2004 passed under section 45-a of the employees' state insurance act (for short esi act) by the respondent esi corporation. by the said order, the petitioner was directed to make a contribution of rs.4,39,028/- in respect of ..... spheres. 25.section 45-a of the act contemplates a summary method to determine contribution in case of deliberate default on the part of the employer. by amendment act 29 of 1989, sections 45-c to 45-i were inserted in the principal act, for the purpose of effecting recovery of arrears by attachment and .....

E.S.i.C., Bangalore Vs. Brooke Bond India Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1982)IILLJ395Kant

..... sabhahit, j.1. this appeal by the employees state insurance corporation is directed against the judgment and order dated 28-9-1979 passed by the e. ..... ' of coffee as incidental to or connected with the manufacture of coffee even though such factory may work throughout the year. after the amendment this position is unaltered and continues. in addition a factory which was engaged in 'blending, packing, or repacking' of coffee not as ..... court by a division bench decision in the case of regional director, esic v. high land coffee works, (1976) 2 karnataka law journal-404 had occasion to consider the effect of amendment and after consider the effect of amendment and after considering the meaning of inclusive definition and reviewing the case ..... were excluded from the operation of the e.s.i. act. the regional director resisted the application by contending that since after amendment, the factory admittedly was working throughout the year and not merely for 7 months or less, it did not fall within the .....

Prem Sukh and ors. Vs. Manager, E.S.i. Corporation and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1981WLN79

..... . the matter has to be examined only in the light of the definition, as it stood prior to the amending act of 1966. he pointed out that in the reference, referred to above, one of the questions referred, was as to whether the employees' state insurance act. 1948 is retrospective in operation? this question was answered in the negative and it was held that ..... the act is not retrospective in operation. similarly, the amending act of 1966 is also not retrospective in operation.10. i have carefully considered the submissions of .....

Tata Employees Union Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ580Ker

..... the points raised for consideration are the same. the grievances voiced in the petitions are also identical. all the petitioners are aggrieved by the amendment made to the employees state insurance (central) rules, 1950 amending rules 50, 51 and 54 with effect from april 1, 1992 by notification dated march 27, 1992, by which the wage ceiling for ..... and the rajya sabha on may 7, 1992. therefore, the amendment to the rule has not in any way resulted in violation of section 95 of the act as contended by the petitioners.4. the employees state insurance act, 1948 was an act to provide certain benefits to employees in cases of sickness, maternity, employment injury, etc. and ..... coverage under the employees state insurance act (for short 'the act') is enhanced from rs. 1,600/- per month to rs. 3,000/- per month and the .....

Vemly Hotels Vs. Kuldeep Singh and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1995)IIILLJ761Bom

..... the period prior to their taking over the hotel in view of the provisions of section 93-a of the act. this section was inserted by employees' state insurance (amendment) act, 1975 and reads as under:'liability in case of establishment where an employer, in relation to a factory or establishment, transfers that factory ..... the hotel during the period from august 1, 1968 to july 31, 1978. from july 1970, the provisions of the employees' state insurance act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') applied to the employees of the merchant hotels private limited on the basis that the hotel is a 'factory' falling under the provisions of ..... which vemly hotels were appointed to conduct the hotel. on june 30, 1982, the deputy regional director of the employees' state insurance corporation issued show cause notice against the petitioners, inter alia, complaining that the insurance inspector was not given inspection of the ledger, cash book payment vouchers, musters, etc. for the period from july .....