Emphasis - Judgment Search Results

National Assn. of Home Builders Vs. Defenders of Wildlife

Court: US Supreme Court

..... regulations only the moratorium prevented it from doing so for mexican motor carriers before 2001 emphasis deleted therefore any potential nepa concerns were generated by another decisionmaker the president and ..... activities that directly or indirectly caus e modifications to the land water or air emphasis added footnote 14 epa also discussed several other regulations that give it discretion for .....

Cunningham Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of all the relevant facts the circumstances in aggravation outweigh the circumstances in mitigation emphasis added rule 4 420 e court must provide a concise statement of the ultimate facts ..... facts reflected in the jury verdict or admitted by the defendant blakely supra at 303 emphasis deleted booker s reasonableness review necessarily anticipates that the imposition of sentences above this level .....

Parents Involved in Community Schools Vs. Seattle School Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and therefore prohibited should be subjected to detailed judicial inquiry internal quotation marks and emphasis omitted justice breyer nonetheless relies on the good intentions and motives of the school ..... for rejecting a motives test for racial classifications are clear enough the court s emphasis on benign racial classifications suggests confidence in its ability to distinguish good from harmful .....

Zuni Public School Dist. No. 89 Vs. Department of Education

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that such percentiles usually represent unique or noncharacteristic situations 41 fed reg 26320 1976 emphasis added that purpose a purpose to exclude statistical outliers is evident in the language ..... fed reg 26320 congress intended measurements based upon an accepted principle of statistical evaluation emphasis added those definitions make clear that percentile refers to a division of a distribution .....

Ramvilas Bajaj Vs. Ashok Kumar and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(4)ALD137; 2007(4)ALT348; AIR2007NOC2064(FB)(AP)

..... vested right will continue irrespective of change of jurisdiction of the different tribunals or forums emphasis added 27 this view was reiterated in commissioner of income tax bangalore v r sharadamma ..... actions it is common to find the legislature using language expressly referring to pending actions emphasis supplied 30 a constitution bench of the supreme court in shamsunder s case supra considered .....

Osborn Vs. Haley

Court: US Supreme Court

..... attorney general shall conclusively establish scope of office or employment for purposes of removal emphasis added this directive markedly differs from congress instruction for cases in which the attorney ..... attorney general shall conclusively establish scope of office or employment for purposes of removal emphasis added this directive markedly differs from congress instruction for cases in which the .....

United Haulers Assn., Inc. Vs. Oneida-herkimer Solid Waste Management ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... project an advantage over rival businesses from out of state emphasis added today the court dismisses those statements as at best ..... the continued economic viability of the town s waste facility emphasis added internal quotation marks omitted brief for respondent o t ..... development inc v wunnicke 467 u s 82 93 1984 emphasis added respondents are doing exactly what the market participant doctrine .....

Massachusetts Vs. Epa

Court: US Supreme Court

..... pollution agent including any physical chemical substance emitted into the ambient air 7602 g emphasis added embraces all airborne compounds of whatever stripe moreover carbon dioxide and other greenhouse ..... appropriate for epa to establish greenhouse gas standards for motor vehicles at this time emphasis added is irrelevant the statutory question is whether sufficient information exists to make an .....

State of Arunachal Pradesh, Represented by Its Section Officer Cum Aut ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2007KAR2497; 2007(5)KarLJ157

..... 21 when it restricts reimbursement on account of its financial constraints emphasis by me 46 in the case of union of india and ..... be found in the impugned government notification dated 8 1 2003 emphasis by me 68 as far as the contention concerning disproportionate action ..... 14 the principle of secondary review based on wednesbury principles applies emphasis by me 71 thus it is clear from the above .....

Dhampur Sugar (Kashipur) Ltd. Vs. State of Uttranchal and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2007(7)SC209; 2007(11)SCALE374; (2007)8SCC418

..... action to produce additional cane and do development as per undertaking given in the application emphasis supplied 25 from the aforesaid conditions it is abundantly clear that the authorities have ..... of import and this court cannot be propelled into the unchartered ocean of governmental policy emphasis supplied 51 similarly in state of maharashtra v lok shiksha sanstha air1973sc588 the applications .....