Emphasis - Year 1985 - Judgments

Jul 01 1985 (FN)

Sedima, S.P.R.L. Vs. Imrex Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-01-1985

..... by mobsters to achieve their desired objectives monopoly control of these enterprises id at 17998 emphasis added he identified four means by which control of legitimate business had been acquired ..... it is this factor of continuity plus relationship which combines to produce a pattern ibid emphasis added the aba report suggests that to effectuate this legislative intent pattern should be interpreted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1985 (FN)

Carchmer Vs. Nash

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-02-1985

..... in other jurisdictions produce uncertainties which obstruct programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation emphasis added according to respondent this language indicates that the drafters intended the ..... u s 733 noting interest in obtaining speedy disposition of outstanding criminal charges emphasis added similarly the terms indictment information or complaint strictly construed would not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 04 1985 (FN)

Oneida County Vs. Oneida Ind. Nation

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-04-1985

..... in ratified indian treaties 1722 1869 national archives microfilm publications microcopy no 668 roll 2 emphasis added the 1802 treaty provided all that certain tract of land beginning at the southwest ..... textually demonstrable constitutional commitment baker v carr 369 u s at 369 u s 217 emphasis added but rather a statutory commitment of authority we have held today that the nonintercourse .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 1985 (FN)

Marek Vs. Chesney

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-27-1985

..... must pay the costs incurred after the making of the offer emphasis added the plain purpose of rule 68 is to encourage settlement ..... common sense and evident statutory purpose it does not require magnified emphasis upon a single ambiguous word in order to give it a ..... substitute its own provisions and secure uniform rules id at 404 emphasis added footnote 2 9 there is probably no provision in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 04 1985 (FN)

Oregon Vs. Elstad

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-04-1985

..... whether to repeat his confession ante at 470 u s 314 emphasis added in applying the intervening events inquiry however courts must use ..... first confession as patently voluntary ante at 470 u s 307 emphasis in original because it was not the product of any ..... adequate warning as to the availability of the privilege so simple emphasis added nearly two decades after that disposition it is undisputed that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 20 1985 (FN)

Lindahl Vs. Opm

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-20-1985

..... health insurance shall be reviewable under the jurisdiction conferred by that subsection id at 63 emphasis added life and health insurance cases are not adverse action matters and they continue to ..... matter falling within its jurisdiction constitutes final agency action for the purposes of judicial review emphasis added footnote 33 from 1925 until the court of claims was abolished by the fcia .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 1985 (FN)

Walters Vs. Radiation Survivors

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-1985

..... given the availability of service representatives to assist the veteran and the veterans administration boards emphasis on nonadversarial procedures o n remand the district court is free to and should consider ..... final decision there are instances in which a final decision is not a final judgment emphasis in original footnote 2 18 similar distinctions have evolved concerning the scope of our .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 1985 (FN)

Phillips Petroleum Co. Vs. Shutts

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-26-1985

..... have the same interest in enforcing their claims against the defendant footnote 2 petitioner places emphasis on the fact that absent class members might be subject to discovery counterclaims cross claims ..... decision dealing with interest liability for suspended royalties ante at 472 u s 816 817 emphasis added oklahoma law expressly provides that the damages caused by the breach of an obligation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 1985 (FN)

Lowe Vs. Sec

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-10-1985

..... respect this relationship between investment advisers and their clients footnote 45 emphasis added page 472 u s 202 the definition of investment ..... 26 27 testimony of james n white of scudder stevens clark emphasis added footnote 35 id at 27 moreover industry representatives felt ..... concerning securities s rep no 91 184 p 43 1969 emphasis added a construction of the act that excludes publishers of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 04 1985 (FN)

Atkins Vs. Parker

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-04-1985

..... a fair hearing after receiving individual notice of agency action reducing or terminating its benefits emphasis added as the secretary acknowledges the plain language of 2020 e 10 presupposes the existence ..... benefits need not be continued under the proviso of 2020 e 10 id at 286 emphasis added these very statements however demonstrate congress understanding that households affected by mass changes .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Emphasis - Judgment Search Results