Emphasis - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: emphasis Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 305 results (0.024 seconds)Tennessee Valley Auth. Vs. Hill
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-15-1978
..... protection of endangered animals 1973 house hearings 205 statement of assistant secretary of the interior emphasis added as it was finally passed the endangered species act of 1973 represented the ..... their primary objectives 1973 house hearings 213 statement of deputy assistant secretary of the interior emphasis added this type of language did not go unnoticed by those advocating strong endangered .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1978
..... any rights of private property or freedom of association 110 cong rec 1519 1964 emphasis added other sponsors shared representative celler s view that title vi embodied constitutional ..... an elaborate mechanism for governmental enforcement by federal agencies supplemental brief supra at 28 emphasis added arguably private enforcement of this elaborate mechanism would not fit within the congressional .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMonell Vs. Department of Soc. Svcs.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-06-1978
..... equity or other proper proceeding for redress 17 stat 13 emphasis added the italicized language plainly imposes liability on a government ..... words importing the masculine gender may be applied to females emphasis added which immediately precedes the definition of person and stated ..... the contract s 1737 93d cong 1st sess 1207 1973 emphasis added other bills designed either completely to remove the federal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. New Mexico
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-03-1978
..... establishes the purposes for which the national forests are established and shall be administered emphasis added the act directs the secretary of agriculture to administer all forests including those ..... water for irrigation and other purposes under authority of the respective states or territories emphasis added contemporaneous administrative regulations reflected that the control of the flow and use .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalifornia Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-03-1978
..... irrigation and other purposes under authority of the respective states or territories 26 stat 1101 emphasis added the secretary of the interior unfortunately interpreted the 1890 and 1891 acts as reserving ..... projects u s department of interior bureau of reclamation reclamation instructions 116 3 1 1959 emphasis added the reclamation act recognizes the interests and rights of the states in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCity of Lafayette Vs. Louisiana Pandl; Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-29-1978
..... transportation of any property in interstate or foreign commerce by any covered common carrier emphasis added kansas city kan hereinafter kansas decided to develop its public levee as a ..... establishes a constructional principle of presumptive congressional deference in behalf of cities indeed our emphasis today in our conclusion that municipalities are exempt from antitrust enforcement when acting as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTrans Alaska Pipeline Rate Cases
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-06-1978
..... discriminations sought to be ended by the mann elkins act footnote 23 petitioners place particular emphasis on the following statement of representative mann w hen the railroad company then files this ..... may suspend the operation of the proposed rate classification regulation or practice id at 4711 emphasis added thus mann quite clearly recognized that the suspension power extended to both changes in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhav Hayawadanrao Hoskot Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-17-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC1548; 1978CriLJ1678; (1978)3SCC544; [1979]1SCR192; 1978(10)LC847(SC)
..... ours from the very beginning our state and national constitutions and laws have laid great emphasis on procedural and substantive safeguards designed to assure fair trials before impartial tribunals in ..... from the very beginning our state and national constitutions and laws have laid great emphasis on procedural and substantive safeguards designed to assure fair trials before impartial tribunals in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElkins Vs. Moreno
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-19-1978
..... which is requisite to establishing maryland domicile id at 217 emphasis added and again the university s actions and policy ..... domicile established by the maryland courts id at 231 second emphasis added and again this distinction between immigrant and nonimmigrant ..... also distinguishes between domiciliaries and nondomiciliaries of maryland app 12a emphasis added see also record 34 55 80 and 115 footnote .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-30-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557
..... limitation the progressive construction of this clause laid down by this case seems desirable emphasis added 44 the jurisprudence of statutory construction especially when a vigorous break with the ..... without the minimal procedural drastic punishment upon a prisoner 132 there has been considerable emphasis by the additional solicitor general on the prison setting in truncating processual justice the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial