Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity supply act 1948 repealed chapter i introductory Page 7 of about 878 results (0.110 seconds)

Aug 31 2012 (HC)

G. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...

Court : Chennai

..... may, inter alia, consist of : (a) not less than six eminent persons with background of industrial management or any related discipline; (b) the chairman of the central electricity authority set up under the electricity(supply) act, 1948; (c) a scientist or engineer from the research and development establishment of the government ; (d) two engineers with experience in the design, engineering, construction or operation and maintenance ..... by itself or authority or corporation established by it through atomic energy stations, as contained in section 22(1) of the act, which is as follows: "section 22. special provisions as to electricity (1) notwithstanding anything contained in the electricity (supply) act, 1948, the central government shall have authority (a) to develop a sound and adequate national policy in regard to atomic power, to co-ordinate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2011 (HC)

M/S. L and T Komatsu Ltd., Bangalore, Rep. by Its Assistant General Ma ...

Court : Karnataka

..... exercised from time to time as occasion arises, unless a different intention appears in the act. there is no different intention in the electricity (supply) act, 1948. therefore, the power to issue a notification under section 49 of the act of 1948, can be exercised from time to time if circumstances so require. 38. section 21 ..... applies. further, power to curtail and/or withdraw the notification issued under section 49 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 giving rebate is implied under section 49 itself on proper interpretation of section 21 of the general clauses act. therefore, this court is of the firm opinion that, power to curtail and/or withdraw the ..... fixed cannot be altered. since the charging provision in the electricity (supply) act, 1948 is subject to the state governments power to issue notification under section 49 of the act granting rebate, the state government, in view of section 21 of the general clauses act, can always withdraw, rescind, add to or modify an exemption .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 30 2003 (HC)

Coimbatore Stock Exchange Ltd., Rep. by Its Director, Stock Exchange B ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2003(4)CTC385; (2003)3MLJ672

..... orders of the electricity regulatory commissions. the submission is that the provision for an appeal to the high ..... of section 29(3) of the act ?19. when substantial arguments on the matter had been completed, it was brought to the notice of the court by the counsel that the indian electricity act, 1910 (act 19/1910), the electricity supply act, 1948 (act 15/1948) and the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998 (act 14/1998) have been repealed by the electricity act 36 of 2003. the new act provides for an appellate tribunal against the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2007 (TRI)

Uttaranchal Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. Vs. Uttaranchal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL182

..... to 54, 56 to 69, 72, 75 and 76 to 83 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, to the extent this act has made specific provisions, provisions of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, shall not apply in the state.15. thus this adaptation and modification act takes notice of the electricity supply act 1948 and repeals some of the provisions of the electricity supply act 1948. however, section 43-a is not mentioned in clause (vi), extracted above ..... was governed by several enactments namely the indian electricity act 1910, the electricity (supply) act 1948, the electricity regulatory commissions act 1998 herein after referred to as the 'central act' and up electricity reforms act 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the reforms act. the central act 1998 provided for establishment of electricity regulatory commissions who were entrusted with the power of fixing tariff. the earlier act, namely electricity (supply) act 1948, had given the power of tariff fixation to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2019 (HC)

Sri B S Dalayath Vs. Bangalore Water Supply &

Court : Karnataka

..... was next contended on behalf of the respondent that by the time the licence period expired, section 7 of the act had been amended and section 71 of the electric (supply) act, 1948 repealed, no provision was made to preserve the rights already acquired under those provisions, hence the appellant is not ..... entitled to purchase the undertaking. it is not the case of the respondent that either expressly or by necessary implication, the new law had taken away the right acquired earlier. that being so section 6 of the general clauses act ..... stating that the board shall have such further powers and duties as are provided in this act. the primary functions of the board are concerned with the generation distribution and utilization of electricity, the development of water power etc. notwithstanding this indication in section 27 that the enumeration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 1992 (HC)

Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Ltd. Vs. Prescribed Authority, Under the R ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(1)WLC452; 1992(1)WLN500

..... . h.s. jain air 1979 sc 65. in that case, the question which arose was, as to whether (standing orders) act, 1946, prevail as against regulations regarding the age of superannuation made by the electricity board under the specific power vested by section-79(c) of the electricity [supply) act, 1948, which was contended to be a special law as against the industrial employment (standing orders ..... ) act. their lordships of the supreme court considered the question and then observed as under:the maxim 'generalia specialibus nonderogant' is quite .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1973 (HC)

The Industrial Finance Corporation of India Vs. Delhi Administration a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1973(27)FLR207]; ILR1973Delhi29; 1974LabIC223

..... has the power of promoting co-ordinated development, generation, supply and distribution of electricity and for that purpose to make, alter, amend and carry out schemes under chapter v of the electricity (supply) act, 1948; ............................................. to make rules and regulations for carrying out the purposes of the act; and to issue directions under certain provisions of the act and to enforce compliance with those directions. the board is ..... also invested by statute with extensive powers of control over electricity undertakings. the power to make rules and regulations and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2002 (SC)

Kaiser-i-hind Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. National Textile Corporation (Mah ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC3404; 2003(1)ALLMR(SC)314; 2002(6)ALT8(SC); JT2002(7)SC339; (2003)1MLJ129(SC); 2002(7)SCALE95; (2002)8SCC182; [2002]SUPP2SCR555

..... the words 'five years' by the words 'seven years' in the kerala act but to the act as a whole, that is the act as amended by the 1967 act and any repugnancy between the kerala act and electricity act, 1910 and the electricity (supply) act, 1948 should be deemed to have been cured by such assent.62. from the aforesaid ..... of such declaration was that the state government was enabled to make orders regarding production, supply and distribution of electricity, there was a possibility of such orders being repugnant to the provisions of the electricity act, 1910 and the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and therefore any such repugnance was cured by the assent given by the president, we ..... the words 'five years' by the words 'seven years' in the kerala act, but to the act as a whole, that is, as amended by the 1967 act and any repugnance between the kerala act and the electricity act, 1910 and the electricity (supply) act, 1948 should be deemed to have been cured by such assent. when assenting to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1998 (SC)

The Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Maharashtra Veej Mandal Ka ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1999SC2319; [1999(81)FLR517]; JT1998(9)SC57; (1999)ILLJ348SC; 1998(6)SCALE557; (1999)2SCC53; [1998]Supp3SCR479; 1999(1)LC585(SC)

..... the remanded proceedings it would be necessary to narrate a few introductory facts. the appellant-board is a statutory undertaking as defined in section 5 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948. it is employing in connection with its statutory functions a number of workmen. it is not in dispute that payment of bonus ..... from gross profits. the three items for which the grievance is canvassed are as follows :(i) development rebate deductible according to the appellant under section 6(d) of the act.(ii) interest on bonds; and(iii) interest on government loans.we shall, therefore, deal with these items seriatim.5. so far as the first item is concerned, ..... , the further question would survive whether these items will have any nexus to the computation of gross profits. computation of gross profits is provided by section 4 of the act which reads as under :'4. computation of gross profits :-- the gross profits derived by an employer from an establishment in respect of any accounting year shall --(a) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1973 (SC)

Narayanan Sankaran Mooss Vs. the State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC175; (1974)1SCC68; [1974]2SCR60

..... government and the board after the receipt of the explanation.7. telephonic consultation is out of question. the board is constituted under the indian electricity (supply) act, 1948. it is a corporate body. it consists of at least three members. one of them has experience of commercial matters and administration; the other is an ..... more outspoken and elaborate. it states : 'the state government consulted the board in the matter of revoking the licence of the kottayam electric supply agency by invoking section 4(1)(a) of the indian electricity act, 1910 and the board vide letter no. bvi/5705/62, dated 26-7-1962 endorsed the views of the government on the ..... the government have, under section 5, sub-section (1) clause (b) of the act enquired from the kerala state electricity board whether the board is willing to purchase the undertaking owned by the kottayam electric supply agency; and whereas, the kerala state electricity board has in its letter no. law-i-5705/62 dated 20-4-63 intimated the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //