Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity supply act 1948 repealed chapter i introductory Page 11 of about 878 results (0.405 seconds)

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... empowered to make rules to regulate the generation, transmission, supply, and use of energy.12. on 10.09.1948, the electricity (supply) act, 1948 ( supply act, 1948 ) was notified to provide for: (a) the rationalization of the production and supply of electricity, (b) taking of measures conducive to electrical development; and (c) all matters incidental to the above. the supply act, 1948 was a more detailed and comprehensive code and provided for establishment of sebs ..... to control generation, distribution, and utilization of electricity within their respective states and .....

Energy Watchdog Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission and Ors. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... for generating and supply of electricity was provided for, namely, the indian electricity act, 1910, the electricity (supply) act, 1928 and the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998. the statement of objects of reasons for this act reads as follows: the electricity supply industry in india is presently governed by three enactments namely, the indian electricity act, 1910, the electricity (supply) act, 1948, the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998. 1.1 the indian electricity act, 1910 created the basic framework for electric supply industry in .....

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Thomas Joseph Alias Thomas M. J.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... with section 181 of the act 2003. electricity act, 2003 30. before the enactment of the act 2003, the indian electricity sector was governed by the indian electricity act, 1910, the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998. the indian electricity act, 1910 created a basic framework for the electricity supply industry in india. the electricity (supply) act, 1948 mandated the creation of state electricity boards, which had the responsibility of facilitating supply of electricity within states. however, the state .....

Kanyaka Fine Weld Ltd. Vs. Superintending Engineer Ii of Electricity D ...

Court : Chennai

..... being the authority of the respondent to pass orders under section 126 of the electricity act and the other regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on account of alternative remedy. the statutory framework:10. the electricity act, 2003 was enacted to overcome the shortcomings of the indian electricity act, 1910 and electricity (supply) act, 1948. the need for harmonising and rationalising the provisions of the earlier statutes and to ..... bring stringent provisions to curtail the practice of unauthorised use of electricity and to evolve a machinery for assessing electricity charges for such unauthorised use and for taking .....

Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. Vs. the Chhattisgarh State

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... that it was not necessary for a.p. gas power corporation ltd. to have a licence in view of section 26(a) of the electricity (supply) act 1948 and section 14 of the reforms act 1998. section 26(a) of the electricity (supply) act 1948 prescribed that no licence would be required by a generating company for the purpose of carrying out its activities. generating company was defined as ..... our captive power plant. 2. we also request you to grant your permission to set up transmission and distribution line/system for supply of power to the industrial units in the proposed industrial estate. we will obtain necessary permission under electricity supply act, 1948, for setting up transmission and distribution lines from cseb. necessary applications in this respect are being submitted to cseb. we will .....

Small Hydro Power Developers' Vs. Transmission Corporation Of A.P.

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... decision could be made by the state in exercise of its power under section 78-a of the electricity (supply) act, 1948. the electricity board framed tariff for supply of electrical energy in terms of sections 46 and 49 of the 1948 act. while framing its tariff, the board could take into consideration the policy decision of the state. 16 ..... & distribution companies have relied upon the provisions of sections 26, 57, 58 read with vi schedule and section 59 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 as also section 62(1)(c) of the electricity act, 2003 in support of the submission that aperc is empowered to regulate wheeling charges. but does it mean that mnes policy, ..... government of andhra pradesh, being goms nos. 93. the policy directive of the government of andhra pradesh is traceable to section 78a of the electricity (supply) act, 1948. undoubtedly the state government had the requisite competence to frame a policy to incentivise generation. once the power plants were set up by entrepreneurs to .....

Uttar Pradesh Power Corpn. Limited and Another Vs. Noida Power Corpn. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... generating company or some other licensee will become void. the general or specific approval mentioned in this clause has reference to only fixation of tariff. the vith schedule of the electricity (supply) act 1948 inter alia, prescribes that tariff has to be fixed by keeping a clear profit which should not exceed the reasonable return. clear profit is defined as difference between income and ..... the provisions in the india electricity act 1910, the electricity (supply) act 1948 and the electricity regulatory commissions act 1998 in a new self-contained comprehensive legislation arose.(emphasis supplied) 25. also the preamble of the act reads as under: an act is consolidate -------------------------------and generally for taking measures conducive to development of electricity industry, promoting competition therein, protecting interest of consumers and supply of electricity to all areas--------- (emphasis supplied) 26. the case so .....

Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Vs. Noida Power Company Ltd. and Uttar

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... generating company or some other licensee will become void. the general or specific approval mentioned in this clause has reference to only fixation of tariff. the vith schedule of the electricity (supply) act 1948 inter alia, prescribes that tariff has to be fixed by keeping a clear profit which should not exceed the reasonable return. clear profit is defined as difference between income and ..... the contract in question was void on application of section 29. in the written submission mr.shanti bhushan has not pressed his plea under section 29 of the contract act.marginal cost of electricity supplied could not be ascertained in advance and could not be mentioned in the agreement but it was ascertainable and hence the contract could not be void. in khivraj .....

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Tata Power Company Limited and

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL662

..... tata power, it is contended, is not entitled to distribute/or directly sell power to consumers in contravention of the indian electricity act, 1910, the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and as per the policy of the state government. it was the alternate contention of rel that tata power cannot effect or engage in ..... of the parties.4. according to rel in terms of the indian electricity act, 1910, electricity (supply) act, 1948 and the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998, a person who has been granted license by the state government alone is entitled and permitted to distribute electric energy in accordance with and subject to the terms of the license ..... has contravened the license conditions. the gravamen of the allegation being that tata power has acted beyond the scope of its license and in violation of the provisions of the indian electricity act, 1910 as well as the electricity (supply) act, 1948. in the absence of valid license secured by tata power, it is impermissible for .....

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Vs. Delhi Transco Limited Through Its

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... to the appellant for real estate development.while the application for license was pending, the electricity act 2003 came into force on 10th june, 2003. the earlier acts namely the indian electricity act 1910, the electricity (supply) act 1948 and the electricity regulatory commission act 1998 were repealed. the state enactments including the delhi electricity reforms act 2000 continued to apply only to the extent it was not inconsistent with the provisions of ..... electricity act 2003. as per section 12, read with sections 14, 15 of the electricity act 2003, license is required for transmission, distribution .....