Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity supply act 1948 repealed chapter i introductory Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 878 results (1.971 seconds)

Oct 30 2007 (TRI)

Uttaranchal Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. Vs. Uttaranchal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL182

..... to 54, 56 to 69, 72, 75 and 76 to 83 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, to the extent this act has made specific provisions, provisions of the electricity (supply) act, 1948, shall not apply in the state.15. thus this adaptation and modification act takes notice of the electricity supply act 1948 and repeals some of the provisions of the electricity supply act 1948. however, section 43-a is not mentioned in clause (vi), extracted above ..... was governed by several enactments namely the indian electricity act 1910, the electricity (supply) act 1948, the electricity regulatory commissions act 1998 herein after referred to as the 'central act' and up electricity reforms act 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the reforms act. the central act 1998 provided for establishment of electricity regulatory commissions who were entrusted with the power of fixing tariff. the earlier act, namely electricity (supply) act 1948, had given the power of tariff fixation to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 11 1950 (HC)

Moti Lal and ors. Vs. the Government of the State of Uttar Pradesh and ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All257

..... any person aggrieved by 'the refusal of renewal of a permit.' reference was also made to section 64a of the motor vehicles' (united provinces amendment) act, 1948 (u.p. act xi [11] of 1948), which provides for some sort of an appeal to the provincial government which may, on its own motion, or on the application of a person aggrieved ..... young, (1898) a. c. 457 : (67 d. j. p. c. 40), sundaram ayyar v. municipal council of madura 25 mad. 635 : (12 m. l. j. 87), finchley electric light co v. fiuchley urban councid, (1903) 1 ch. 437 : (72 it. j. ch. 297).166. in the case of amba prasad v. jugal kishore : air1936all112 , the view was expressed ..... of these rights were to be found in the constitution of the german republic. the function of these fundamental rights as conceived by the weimar constitution was: 'to supply standards and prescribe limits for the legislature, the executive and administration of justice. both in the federation and in the states. they were intended according to a writer .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 1950 (SC)

A.K. Gopalan Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1950SC27; 1950CriLJ1383; (1950)IIMLJ42(SC); [1950]1SCR88

..... hanging by the neck, logically there can be no objection if it provides a sentence of death by shooting by a firing squad or by guilloting or in the electric chair or even by boiling in oil. a procedure laid down by the legislature may offend against the court's sense of justice and fair play and a sentence ..... can be made for reasons connected with (1) the security of the state, (2) the maintenance of public order, and (3) the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community. the impugned act refers to all the subjects mentioned in lists i and iii in regard to which law of preventive detention can be made. section 3(1) of ..... that its intent and application could only be ascertained by 'the gradual process of inclusion and exclusion' [davidson v. new orleans 96 u.s. 97 and, as recently as 1948, another judge referred to the difficulty of 'giving definiteness to the vague contours of due process' and 'of spinning judgment upon state action out of that gossamer concept :' haley .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1950 (SC)

Province of Bombay Vs. Kusaldas S. Advani and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1950SC222; (1951)53BOMLR1; (1950)IIMLJ703(SC); [1950]1SCR621

..... a public purpose or the interest of the public safety or the defence of the realm or the efficient prosecution of the war, or the maintenance of essential supplies and the like may well be and, indeed, are often left to the subjective opinion or satisfaction of the executive authority. merely because such a matter involves ..... namely, that it was necessary to take control in the interest of the public safety, the defence of the realm, the efficient prosecution of the war or for maintaining supplies and services essential to the community. singleton. j having dismissed the action, the appellant went up to the appeal court. if the reasonings and the conclusions of the ..... . ltd. v. province of bombay [(1948) l.r. 76 i.a. 57; a.i.r. 1949 p.c. 136], may also be referred to. relevant portions of section 4, sub-section (1) of the indian electricity act, 1910, provided : 'the provincial government may if in its opinion the public interests require, revoke a license in the following cases, namely : ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1951 (HC)

Madangopal Kabra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1951Raj94a; [1951]20ITR214(Raj)

..... where a body of persons act in excess of legal authority, a writ of prohibition was the remedy. in this case, a writ of prohibition was issued to the electricity comrs. directing them not to proceed with a certain scheme which they had in hand for effecting improvements for the supply of electricity, notwithstanding that the order ..... abrogate all other constitutional provisions inconsistent therewith & then in force in the state. it was urged that the report of the indian states finances enquiry committee 1948-49 was accepted by the rajpramukh of rajasthan, & under that report levy of income-tax by the union of india was recommended for the assessment year 1950 ..... state of rajasthan & according to article 8 of this covenant, an instrument of accession was executed by maharajadhiraj maharana shri bhopalsinghji of udaipur on 15-4.-1948. this instrument was duly accepted by the governor-general of india on 12-5-1949. according to article 3, the rajpramukh accepted all matters enumerated in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1951 (HC)

Lokanath Misra Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1952Ori42

..... order of the day. in u.s.s.r., nearly all industries are collectively owned & operated. in u.s.a., many of the public utility services such as water-supply, gas-works. railways, electric power plants are under public ownership (see 'applied economies' by r.t. bye & w.w. hewett, chap. v, edn. 4.) even in great britain where free competition ..... , prior to the specified date, that is, 1-10-1946. my learned brother has. made a distinction between them & those that were granted after 15-2-1948, the day, when the impugned act was notified as coming into force. the point of distinction is that in the latter cases, the permit-holders must have known that notwithstanding the guarantee given to ..... that date.21. the permits with which this case deals (permit nos. 49/1, 23/3, 48/2 & 53/2) were all granted after the subsidiary act came into force on 15-2-1948. the crucial question is whether such permit-holders can claim any property right in a business run on the basis of such permits so as to entitle .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1951 (SC)

In Re: the Delhi Laws Act, 1912, the Ajmer-merwara (Extension of Laws) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1951]2SCR747

..... s.c.r. (canada) 1]. this case arose in connection with the regulations respecting chemicals made pursuant to powers conferred by the department of munitions and supply act and by the war measures act. the question was whether these regulations were ultra vires the constitution. it was held that except in one part the regulations were intra vires, and it ..... 's case, as i have shown, there was no question of delegation of legislative power at all. when referring to section 4 of the bombay city civil court act, 1948, i said in my judgment in the state of bombay v. narottamdas : [1951]2scr51 that the section was an instance of conditional legislation and that there was ..... if any, as may be specified in the notification.' 239. acting under the proviso the provincial government on the 11th march, 1948, extended by notification the life of the act by one year. the validity of the proviso to sub-section (v) of section 1 of the act was attacked on the ground that it amounted to delegation of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1951 (HC)

Sri Lakshmindra theertha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt and anr. Vs. the C ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1952Mad613; (1952)IMLJ557

..... archanas was not introduced; that the vacant sites of the temple were not leased out for the sheds; that the electrical lighting arrangements in the temple were insufficient and of a temporary nature; that the drains around the temple and inside ..... temples. the expense of conducting the seven kalotsavams is provided by podu katta-laidars or common kattalaidars who instead of money, supply the articles necessary for the abhishekam, archana and naivedyam etc. the seven kalams are: milk naivedya between 6 and 7 ..... the petitions as originally filed was the hindu religious endowments board, madras. when the madras hindu religious and charitable endowments act (act xix (19) of 1951), came into force on 30-9-51, the petitioners obtained leave to amend the petitions ..... to the board. ultimately, one sri pathachar was appointed as agent under a power of attorney dated 24th december, 1948. the petitioner's complaint is that this action of the board was instigated and goaded by one mr. a. lakshminarayana .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 1952 (SC)

D.K. Nabhirajiah Vs. the State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1952SC339; [1952]1SCR744

..... 2nd respondent as required by law but added that he wanted the premises for his own use to set up one of his grown-up sons in a business in electrical goods. the third respondent aswathanarayan rao however wanted the house for a children's school which he was running under the name of bala mandir and so not only ..... not only under clause (bb) of sub-rules (2) of rule 81 of the defence of india rules, but also under the supplies, services and miscellaneous provisions (temporary powers) act of 1947. we have not got this act before us and it was not even referred to the course of the arguments. hence, no decision is called for on this point. ..... of balamandira home for the children and for residential use of the director. you are therefore directed under clause 3 (4) of the mysore house rent and accommodation control order, 1948 to hand over possession of the above house to the said sri aswathanarayana rao, director, balamandira.' 3. by an order dated 20th september, 1949, made on an application .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 1952 (HC)

Chairman, Budge Budge Municipality Vs. Mongru Mia and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1953Cal433,57CWN25

..... the partition of india, the reference to the lahore high court was converted into 'the high court of east punjab' by the indian independence (adaptation of central acts and ordinances) order, 1948, when exactly or by what enactment nagpur was added, it was not possible to trace. 38. on the basis of the history of article 151 set out ..... thus discretionary with the commissioners to maintain a slaughter-house and no one has a right to insist that they must maintain a slaughter house in order to supply him with meat for the purpose of his trade. it is well settled that no writ or direction will issue for the enforcement of a statutory right unless ..... n. 10 (h), and stronger reliance was placed on the decision in -- 'india electric works ltd. v. registrar of trade marks' : air1947cal49 . in my view, properly regarded, the first two decisions only construed the calcutta municipal act of 1923 and held that the act did not intend election disputes, which it directed to be tried by the high court, to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //