Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity supply act 1948 repealed chapter i introductory Page 10 of about 878 results (0.205 seconds)

Karam Singh Sobti and anr. Vs. Shri Pratap Chand and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1305; [1964]4SCR647

..... the mysore state electricity board v. the bangalore woolen, cotton and silk mills ltd. and others etc.(1). this court referred to the decision of the privy council in ..... have regard to the provisions of this act" merely mean that "where the new act has slightly modified or clarified the previous provisions, these modifications and clarifications should be applied". we see no other way of harmonising sub-s. (2) with the first proviso thereto. a similar expression occurring in s. 49 of the electricity (supply) act (liv of 1948) was considered by this court in .....

Universal Music India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)

..... the supreme court found that the procedure adopted by the government in fixing the minimum wage under section 5(1) of the minimum wages act, 1948 was not vitiated merely on the ground that the government had failed to constitute a committee under section 5(1) (a) of the statute ..... a) of the electricity act, 1910. it was observed that there was nothing in the language of the sub-section or in the subject matter ..... ' signifies the subjective opinion of the government and not an opinion subject to objective tests. in the hubli electricity co. ltd. v. the province of bombay, the court was required to consider the opinion of the government under section 4(1)( ..... the authority in good faith. as was held by lord denning m.r. in associated provincial pictures houses ltd. v. wednesbury corporation (1948) 1 kb 223 ca 'that a person entrusted with the discretion must direct himself properly in law. he must call his own attention .....

In the Matter Of: Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board, Shimla Vs. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... the generating station to that extent. the same would be inconsistent with the provisions of law existing then i.e. electricity (supply) act, 1948. under section 61(d) of the electricity act, 2003, the recovery of cost of electricity in a reasonable manner is envisaged. therefore, any attempt by the commission to refuse to factor them in the tariff ..... 5%. this direction shows that the appellant has to pay not only the cost of generation comprising of 5 components as given in eighth schedule of the electricity (supply) act 1948 and clause 7 and clause 21 of regulation 2004 but also a sum amounting to 5% of the cost of generation. (i) the contention of ..... provide for various elements of cost and they will not prohibit the parties for agreeing to lower norms or lower tariff. (e) the eighth schedule of electricity (supply) act, 1948 subscribes to the elements constituting the cost of production. the eighth schedule does not provide that in every case all the costs and expense of the generating .....

Tata Steel Ltd. and Tata Power Com. Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... granted permission to tisco to establish 3 x 67.5 mw jamshedpur power company ltd. under section 15(a), 43(a)(1)(c) and 44(1) of the electricity (supply) act 1948. the notification, however, does not stop there. it goes on to say that the power produced by jamshedpur power company, after the consumption of tisco, which is ..... 67.5 mw) in jamshedpur power company ltd. and granted sanction under section 15(a), 43(a)(1)(c) and 44(1) of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (herein after referred to as the act of 1948).3. section 15(a) laid down the objectives, jurisdiction etc. of a generating company and it, inter alia, said that the objective of generating ..... , in view of the proposal for amendment in the configuration, now the state government, after consultation with electricity board, has granted its permission under section 15a, 43 (a), (c) and 44(1) of electricity supply act, 1948 for establishment of unit of 2 x 120 mw in place of proposed construction of 3 x 67.5 megawatt capacity's power .....

H.P.St.Electricity Regulatory Comm. Andanr Vs. H.P.State Electricity B ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... deals with repeal and saving. it reads as follows:- 185. repeal and saving.-.(1) save as otherwise provided in this act, the indian electricity act, 1910 (9 of 1910, the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (54 of 1948) and the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998 (14 of 1998) are hereby repealed. (2) notwithstanding such repeal, - (a) anything done or any ..... stood before such repeal shall continue to be in force till the regulations under section 53 of this act are made; (d) all rules made under sub-section (1) of section 69 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (54 of 1948) shall continue to have effect until such rules are rescinded or modified, as the case may ..... be; (e) all directives issued, before the commencement of this act, by a state government under the enactments specified in the schedule .....

Siel Limited Vs. the Punjab State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL931

..... them by the commission. while disallowing the aforesaid amount, the commission had also expressed the view that section 59 of electricity (supply) act, 1948, section 29(2) of the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998 imply that the commission is bound to allow only such expenses/ costs in the arr, which are properly chargeable ..... 46, 57 and 57a of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (54 of 1948) and the sixth schedule thereto. (b) the case of the board or its successor entities, the principles under section 59 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (54 of 1948); (c) that the tariff progressively reflects the cost of supply of electricity at an adequate and improving level ..... counsel for the industrial consumers appear to be correct. according to the proviso to section 61 of the act, the terms and conditions for determination of tariff framed under the electricity (supply) act, 1948, act of 1998 and the enactments specified in the schedule thereto shall continue to apply for a period of .....

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... 's revenues and tariffs by regulations. the commission shall be guided by (i) the financial principles and their application provided in the sixth schedule to the electricity (supply) act, 1948 read with sections 57 & 57a of the said act. (ii) the factors which would encourage efficiency, economic use of the resources, good performance, optimum investments and the commission when decide to depart from the factors ..... power to make rules, while section 61 confers power to make regulations. section 63 (3) provides that the provisions of dera act, notwithstanding that the same are inconsistent with or contrary to the provision of the indian electricity act, 1910 or the electricity (supply) act 1948, shall prevail. in terms of proviso to sub section (2) of section 63, the government is conferred with the power to .....

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electri ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... to be specified by the appropriate commission; (h) the promotion of co-generation and generation of electricity from renewable sources of energy; (i) the national electricity policy and tariff policy: provided that the terms and conditions for determination of tariff under the electricity (supply) act, 1948, the electricity regulatory commission act, 1998 and the enactments specified in the schedule as they stood immediately before the appointed date, shall ..... tariff) regulations, 2005. 2. scope and extent of application 2.1 these regulations shall apply in all cases of determination of generation tariff under section 62 of the electricity act, 2003 for supply of electricity to a distribution licensee, but shall not apply where tariff has been determined through the transparent process of bidding in accordance with the guidelines issued by the central government .....

Gajendra Haldea S/O Late Shri Rao Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in : (2008)LCAPTEL203

..... its infancy. the act envisaged growth of the electricity industry through private licensees. accordingly, it provided for licensees who could supply electricity in a specified area. it created the legal framework ..... statement of objects and reasons of the electricity bill, 2001, the preamble of the act of 2003 and relevant provisions of the act are set out below: the electricity supply industry in india is presently governed by three enactments namely, the indian electricity act, 1910, the electricity (supply) act, 1948, the electricity regulatory commissions act, 1998. 1.1 the indian electricity act, 1910 created the basic framework for electric supply industry in india which was then in .....

In the Matter Of: Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. Gujarat Vs. Gujarat ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

..... examine the jurisdiction of state commission vis- -vis powers of state government in regard to fixation of tariff. 43. prior to enactment of electricity act 2003 and electricity regulatory commission act 1998, the indian power sector was governed by indian electricity act 1910 and electricity (supply) act 1948. state electricity boards were created under 1948 act. power to set retail tariff was delegated to boards and rate committees setup under section 57a of ..... 1948 act. power to set tariff for generating companies was delegated to appropriate government under section 43a of the 1948 act. electricity regulatory commission act 1998 was enacted in 1998. state electricity regulatory commissions were set up .....