Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: electricity supply act 1948 repealed chapter i introductory Court: punjab and haryana Page 1 of about 10 results (0.085 seconds)

Subhash Bansal and ors. Vs. Income Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(P& H)83

..... after retirement. it is claimed that the petitioners are covered under the punjab state electricity board provident fund regulations, 1960 (for brevity, 'the 1960 regulations'), which have been notified under section 79(c) of the electricity supply act, 1948 (for brevity, 'the 1948 act'), vide notification no. 777/pseb, dt. 9th sept., 1960. as per ..... provisions of regulation 38 of the 1960 regulations, interest component on credit balance retained in the provident fund (pf) is exempted from tax in terms of the provisions of chapter-ill, section 10(11) of the 1961 act ..... detailed preliminary objections asserting that interest income cannot be brought within the scope and ambit of tax in contravention of various provisions of the 1925 act, 1948 act, 1961 act and 1960 regulations as well as clarification dt. 15th june, 2006 issued by the cbdt (p-5). it was, thus, requested that .....

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... and liabilities while part-vii comprising sections 67 to 77 contains "provisions as to certain corporations" like state electricity board constituted under the electricity supply act, 1948, the state warehousing corporation established under the warehousing corporation act, 1962. this part also makes arrangement for the generation and supply of electricity power and water as well as the functioning of the punjab state financial corporation. section 70 of this ..... -organization of the erstwhile state of punjab. section 67 of part-vii therefore specifically provides that the body-corporates, namely, (a) state electricity board constituted under the electricity supply act, 1948 and (b) the state warehousing corporation established under the warehousing corporation act, 1962 shall continue to function in those very areas where they had been functioning immediately before the `appointed day' subject to such directions .....

Bhikhan Bobla and ors. Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1963P& H255

..... full bench. the question mainly concerns the scope, legality and constitutionality of section 36 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter called the act).2. four writ petitions had been filed in this court under article 226 of the constitution praying for the issuance of an appropriate writ, order, ..... air 1959 sc 107, dass c. j. cited with approval the celebrated definition of quasi-judicial body given by atkin l. j. in rex v. electricity commrs., 1924-1 kb 171, which still holds the field, namely,;'whenever any body of persons having legal authority to determine questions affecting rights of subjects, and ..... the question of giving the notice and providing a hearing, the courts is england in earlier cases have invoked 'the justice of the common law' to 'supply the omission of the legislature'.63. about the maxim expressio unius (personaevel rei), cst exclusio altcrius, courts have warnedthat great caution is necessary in dealing with .....

Chahat Khan Bahadur Khan and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1966P& H111

..... the publication of a notification for that purpose under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (east. punjab act 50 of 1948), hereinafter to be referred as 'the act', sometime in 1956. on appointment of the consolidation officer under that very section, after advice of the land-owners of ..... and ordered the scheme of village gulalta to be amended under section 36 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) to provide separate tak for chahi area. the petitioners claim that they were never heard before the said order was passed. it ..... fanciful when the constitution itself has expressly provided for another authority more competent to evaluate the correct position to do the needful ?'again in mysore state electricity board v. bangalore woollen cotton and silk mills ltd., air 1963 sc 1128, it was observed that inconvenience is not a decisive factor in .....

Cepham Milk Specialities Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2002]127STC116(P& H)

..... annexure p1 with the writ petition. the petitioner is also registered under the punjab general sales tax act, 1948 and the central sales tax act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1948 and the 1956' acts respectively).4. under the 1948 act, the milk purchased for making ghee, paneer and butter, etc., was, hithertofore, subjected to ..... have no right to compel the board or anyone else to provide any facility. the board is under no obligation to ensure a regular supply of milk, water, electricity or even labour to the plant. in fact, the plant may have to be closed down for non-availability of power. yet, the ..... undertakingscientific and industrial research, research into matters affecting industrialpsychology and research into matters relating to production and to theconsumption or use of goods and services supplied by the industry.(viii) to take requisitemeasures to increase consumption of drinking milk and milk products throughproper advertisement and other related channels of media ;(11 .....

Hazara Singh Ganda Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1961P& H34

..... on account of loans granted to him by the central government or a state government or the rehabilitation finance administration constituted under the rehabilitation finance administration act, 1948 (12 of 1948), and any interest on such loans;(iii) the amount of purchase money or any part thereof and any interest on such amount or part remaining ..... any urban property or rural building; or(iii) to cancel the allotment. (4) a copy of every order under sub-rule (3) shall be supplied free of cost to the allottee.the sanads required to be issued by the settlement officers under this rule but actually issued by the managing officers before the ..... matter. the provisions of 1883 and 1884 acts are general provisions while the provisions of section 30 of the act are special provisions. therefore section 30 of the act, which provides for special circumstances, must prevail over the general provision. see in this connection the decisions in british columbia electric railway company ltd. v. stewart, 1913 .....

Health-aid Foods Specialist Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2002P& H112

..... annexure p.1 wiht the writ petition. the petitioner is also registered under the punjab general sales tax act. 1948 and the central sales tax act, 1956 (hereinafter ref. to as the 1948 and the 1956 acts respectively) . 3. under the 1948 act, the milk purchased for making ghee, paneer and butter etc. was, hithertofore, subjected to a purchase ..... shall have no right to compel the board or anyone else to provide any facility. the board is under no obligation to ensure a regular supply of milk, water, electricity or even labour to the plant. in fact, the plant may have to be closed down for non-availability of power. yet, the ..... or undertakingscientific and industrial research, research into matters affectingindustrial psychology and research into matters relating to production and tothe consumption or use of goods and service supplied by the industry.(x) to plan and executeprogrammes of high level education research and training in dairy technologyand husbandry; (xi) to secure funds from the .....

Jagir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [1994]80CompCas30(P& H)

..... . there was a great disparity of prices between the raw material, i.e., cotton and the finished products. there was substantial deterioration in the supply of electricity to the industry, which prevented the mills from reaching the point of optimum production.3. the further stand of the petitioner in the writ petition ..... of punjab [1972] rlr 82 ; [1972] 30 stc 581, held that there was no provision either in the punjab general sales tax act, 1948, or the punjab land revenue act, 1887, which gives priority to the arrears of sales tax or the land revenue over the secured creditors of the defaulters. according to the ..... government into the scheduled industries or industrial undertakings regarding the circumstances leading to the various deteriorated conditions in the industrial undertaking. section 15 of the said act is reproduced below :' 15. power to cause investigation to be made into scheduled industries or industrial undertakings.--where the central government is of the opinion that .....

Om Parkash Rajinder Kumar Vs. K.K. Opal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H464; [1967]19STC153(P& H)

..... notification, notwithstanding that such purchase is not covered by clause (ff) of section 2.(iii) * * * * *(iv) sales to any undertaking supplying electrial energy to the public under a licence or sanction granted or deemed to have been granted under the indian electricity act, 1910, of goods for use by it in the generation or distribution of such energy;(v) sales or purchases of ..... . the petitioner, a partnership firm of amritsar, is a registered dealer under the punjab general sales tax act, 46 of 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act). shri k.k. opal, excise and taxation officer (enforcement), hereinafter called the respondent, was appointed the assessing authority under act for the whole of the state of punjab by notification dated february 10, 1964 (annexure b). his .....

Chadha Papers Limited Vs. Punjab State Industrial Development Corporat ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1999)122PLR536

..... title had to be clear and marketable and without the claim of the third parties against the petitioner as held by the apex court in isha marbles v. bihar electricity board, (1995)2 s.c.c. 648. the petitioner had accepted the movable and immovable property on the clear understanding that the title would be issued to it ..... petition on 19.3.1999 had not issued any direction to give a copy of order, the respondent corporation was not under an obligation to supply the same. does it behave such an institution to act in such a manner? we are afraid, we can only adversely comment upon the attitude adopted by the respondent corporation.42. what we ..... observations, as quoted above, hon'ble supreme court then quoted a passage from the judgment of lord greene mr in associated provincial picture houses ltd. v. wednesbury corporation, (1948)1 k.b. 223 which reads as under:-'it is true the discretion must be exercised reasonably. now what does that mean? lawyers familiar with the phraseology commonly used .....