District Magistrate - Judgment Search Results

Collector (District Magistrate) Allahabad and anr. Vs. Raja Ram Jaiswa ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC1622; 1985(1)SCALE1044; (1985)3SCC1; [1985]3SCR995

the plot No. 26 purchased by him. The plan for the proposed theatre was sanctioned both by the District Magistrate and the local municipality in December 1970. It may be recalled here that the judgment of this Court … authorities not to grant a certificate of approval for construction of a cinema building. Overruling the objections the District Magistrate, the Licencing Authority under the U.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 granted the requisite certificate of approval under Rule

Srikant Vs. District Magistrate, Bijapur and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2007(2)JCR216(SC)]; 2007(1)KarLJ337; 2006(12)SCALE270; (2007)1SCC486

and Slum Grabbers Act, 1985 (in short the 'Act'). The detention order was passed on 26.5.2005 by the District Magistrate holding that the detenu was indulging in such activities which amounted to immoral activities as detailed in the … way of a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution. The view taken in Bhagubhai Dullabhbhai Bhandari v. District Magistrate : 1956CriLJ1126 that the binding nature of the conviction recorded by the High Court against which a Special

Addl. District Magistrate (Rev.) Delhi Admn. Vs. Shri Siri Ram

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2000(6)SC643; 2000(4)SCALE483; (2000)5SCC451; AIR2000SC2143

Matched in: Parties Addl. District Magistrate (Rev.) Delhi Admn. Vs. Shri Siri Ram

District Magistrate and anr. Vs. R. Kumara Vel

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1993SC2633; 1993CriLJ3677; JT1993(4)SC431; 1993(3)SCALE322; 1994Supp(1)SCC59; [1993]Supp1SCR478

Act, 1982 (the Act). The orders of detention were passed in respect of both the detenus by the District Magistrate, Thanjavur under the Act. The detenus challenged the detention by way of habeas corpus petitions before the Tamil … Nadu against the judgment of the High Court.3. Both the detenus were reported in the records of the District Magistrate as habitual criminals having history-sheet of committing various crimes. The occurrence which has been made the ground-case in

Additional District Magistrate (City) Agra Vs. Prabhakar Chaturvedi an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2359; JT1996(1)SC207; (1996)ILLJ811SC; 1996(1)SCALE202; (1996)2SCC12; 1996(1)LC280(SC); (1996)2UPLBEC983

Matched in: Parties Additional District Magistrate (City) Agra Vs. Prabhakar Chaturvedi and anr.

Hashmatullah Vs. District Magistrate/Adhyaksha Zila Parishad Basti and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(9)SCC380

Matched in: Parties Hashmatullah Vs. District Magistrate/Adhyaksha Zila Parishad Basti and ors.

District Magistrate, Nowgong and anr. Vs. Sarat Mudoi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1984SC43; 1983CriLJ1728; 1983(2)SCALE302; (1984)1SCC25; [1983]3SCR957

under Section 3(2) read with Section 3(3) of the National Security Act, 1980 ('Act' for short) being the District Magistrate of Nowgong and the State of Assam assail the decision of the High Court at Gauhati quashing the … the decision of the High Court at Gauhati quashing the order of detention.2. On October 20, 1982, the District Magistrate made the following order:Whereas I am satisfied from the dossier submitted by Superintendent of Police, Nowgong that it

District Magistrate and anr. Vs. Kulbir Chand

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1990Supp(1)SCC141

Matched in: Parties District Magistrate and anr. Vs. Kulbir Chand

Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur Vs. Shivakant Shukla

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC1207; 1976CriLJ945; (1976)2SCC521; [1976]SuppSCR172; 1976(8)LC610(SC)

India Act, Raghubar Dayal J. held that the Court could go into the question as to whether the District Magistrate exercised the power of detention under the Defence of India Rules bonaflde and in accordance with the rules. … having been afforded to it, a serious infirmity would creep into the detention order (see Rameshwar Singh v. District. Magistrate Burdwan and Anr. : 1964CriLJ257 and Sk. Abdul Munnaf v. State of West Bengal : 1974CriLJ1233 .220. One

The District Magistrate vs Shiju P V

Court: Kerala

RESPONDENT/1ST RESPONDENT IN THE W.P.(C): HARITHA V.KUMAR, IAS (AGE & FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CIVIL STATIION P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 003. SRI. M.C. ASHI, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP … DATED 05.08.2022 IN W.P.(C) NO.22571/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA. REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN W.P.(C):1 THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AYYANTHOLE P.O., THRISSUR, PIN-680 003. 2 THE DISTRCT POLICE CHIEF, THRISSUR RURAL, THRISSUR, PIN-680 003. SRI. M.C. ASHI,