Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Dismiss - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 04 2013

Dismissed. Vs. Mangal (Since Deceased Through Legal Representatives)

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-04-2013

less substantial question of law, arises for adjudication in this second appeal. Accordingly the instant second appeal is dismissed. Legal representatives of respondent-plaintiff are permitted to deposit the preemption money in the trial Court within two months


Mar 20 2013

Be Dismissed as the Petitioner Has Not Explained Full Vs. Punjab State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-20-2013

preliminary submissions reads thus:- “That the present writ petition is liable to CWP No.18473 of 2011 -2- be dismissed as the petitioner has not explained full facts of the present case. It is a fact that as


Aug 20 2014

Dismissal of Application of the Petitioner-plaintiff Under Order Vs. S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-20-2014

BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON. ***** Argued by:- Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.(Oral) Dismissal of application of the petitioner-plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC filed


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2006

Shri K. Sippe Gowda S/o late Chikka Javaregowda (under orders of dismi ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-29-2006

ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The petitioner, a dismissed Court Officer of the High Court of Karnataka has challenged in this writ petition the order of dismissal


Nov 26 2012

“that the Instant Writ Petition Deserves to Be Dismissed on the Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-26-2012

No.11734 of 2012 -2- it is stated as under :- “That the instant writ petition deserves to be dismissed on the ground that the answering respondent is not at fault for not delivery of the possession of


Feb 12 2014

His Appeal Was Also Dismissed. Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-12-2014

not matriculate. The benefit of revised pay scale was withdrawn on 31.08.2007. Plaintiff filed the suit which was dismissed and his appeal was also dismissed. Anil Kumar 2014.02.18 13:37 I attest to the accuracy and Learned counsel


Feb 18 2014

Plaintiffs Is Without Merits and Same Stands Dismissed.” Vs. Jinder ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-18-2014

be consolidated with the other suit and the application of the plaintiffs is without merits and same stands dismissed.”. Khan Md.Firoz 2014.02.21 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Mr.Vibhan Jain, learned counsel


Aug 11 2016

Sanjay Kumar Rai Inspector (Dismissed) Vs. Union of India represented ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-11-2016

of the acquittal in the criminal case, has been rejected by the respondents. 2. Admittedly, the petitioner was dismissed from service after a full fledged departmental enquiry by an order dated 18/2/2005. The dismissal order was challenged


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial