Deputy Commissioner - Judgment Search Results

Special Deputy Commissioner Vs. Mrs. Bhargavi Madhavan

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1991KAR479; 1991(4)KarLJ740

(4) of Section 95 of the Revenue Act by the Deputy Commissioner in dealing with an application made by an occupant lands diverted for non-agricultural use and that the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District, Bangalore, shall sanction diversion of those lands for

Special Deputy Commissioner Vs. Bhargavi Madhavan

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1987KAR1260

had issued directions to all the Deputy Commissioners including the Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore, not to reject the permission for conversion of and remitted the matter for reconsideration. Again, the Special Deputy Commissioner by his order dated 24-5-85 rejected the application of the

Sanulla Vs. Deputy Commissioner

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1988KAR3316

of the applications. As long as the records before the Deputy Commissioner did not contain the applications of the petitioners and passed under the Land Grant Rules; that the Special Deputy Commissioner did not either call for or receive the records pertaining

Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax Vs. R.S. ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1999]235ITR411(Ker)

Alathur, in his report dated July 16, 1987, to the Deputy Commissioner, stated that there was partition among the assessee, his 15, 1989, to revise the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner for the aforesaid assessment years suo motu. The Deputy Commissioner

Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes) Vs. N ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2004]135STC78(Ker)

decision of the Full Bench, it is clear that the Deputy Commissioner in exercise of the jurisdiction vested in him under reads as follows :'35. Powers of revision of the Deputy Commissioner suo motu.--(1) The Deputy Commissioner may, of his own motion,

The Deputy Commissioner (C.T.) Vs. Indian Refrigeration Industries Pri ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1980]46STC264(Mad)

v. H.M. Esufali H.M. Abdulali [1973] 32 S.T.C. 77 and Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes v. H.R. Sri Ramulu [1977] 39 ceases to be operative. The excerpt cited above from Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes v. H.R. Sri Ramulu [1977] 39 S.T.C.

The Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s Sony India Pvt Ltd

Court: Karnataka

APPEALS AND UPHOLDING THE RE-ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED1303.2017 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT) 3.3., DVO-3, BENGALURU FILED UNDER (BY SHRI. P.B.HARISH, ADVOCATE) IN S.T.A No.264 OF2017BETWEEN:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT-4.1) DVO-4, 4TH FLOOR ROOM NO.404, VTK-2

The Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s Ws Retail Services Pvt Ltd

Court: Karnataka

AND FILED AGAINST THE RE-ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED2702.2016 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT4 DVO, MANGALURU, FILED UNDER SECTION391) DATED2404.2019 VAT AP.80/2017-18, DATED2404.2019, CST.AP.06/2017-18, DATED2404.2019 PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (APPEALS)-3, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU. PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEALS

The Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s. Prakash Retail Pvt Ltd

Court: Karnataka

OF2022AND CONNECTED MATTERS22IN STRP No.38 OF2022IN S.T.A No.262 OF2017BETWEEN:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT-4.1) DVO-4, 4TH FLOOR, ROOM NO.404 STRP No.39 OF2022BETWEEN:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA-1 1ST MAIN ROAD GANDHINAGAR

The Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s. W.s. Retail Services Pvt Ltd

Court: Karnataka

OF2022AND CONNECTED MATTERS22IN STRP No.38 OF2022IN S.T.A No.262 OF2017BETWEEN:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT-4.1) DVO-4, 4TH FLOOR, ROOM NO.404 THE ORDER DATED1603.2020 PASSED IN VAT.AP.NO.124/2-17-18 PASSED BY THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS-2) BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING