Deputy Commissioner - Judgment Search Results

Special Deputy Commissioner Vs. Mrs. Bhargavi Madhavan

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1991KAR479; 1991(4)KarLJ740

diversion sought for by them. Imposition of conditions by the Deputy Commissioner on matters specified in Sub-section (4) and the applicant such enquiry and local inspection are completed, if the Deputy Commissioner forms his opinion on matters respecting which conditions are to

Special Deputy Commissioner Vs. Bhargavi Madhavan

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1987KAR1260

order and remitted the matter for reconsideration. Again, the Special Deputy Commissioner by his order dated 24-5-85 rejected the application of is, the Bangalore Development Authority and not to the Deputy Commissioner. Even so, after more than one and half years after

Sanulla Vs. Deputy Commissioner

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1988KAR3316

produced the records of the case which were before the Deputy Commissioner when he heard and decided the case.8. Sri S.G. cannot be held to be legal and proper. The Deputy Commissioner ought to have verified the aforesaid two aspects. In the

Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax Vs. R.S. ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1999]235ITR411(Ker)

Assistant Commissioner for the aforesaid assessment years suo motu. The Deputy Commissioner after the inquiry by common order dated March 20, decisions were cited before the Commissioner by the assessee, the Commissioner did not place reliance on them, he added. It is

Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes) Vs. N ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2004]135STC78(Ker)

Government Pleader appearing for the revision petitioner, submits that the Deputy Commissioner in exercise of his power under Section 35 of getting at escaped turnover and the power of the Deputy Commissioner to correct illegalities in the orders passed by certain authorities

The Deputy Commissioner (C.T.) Vs. Indian Refrigeration Industries Pri ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1980]46STC264(Mad)

assessing authority had excluded from the assessment and which the Deputy Commissioner's order did not touch in his revision. The Board was an appeal against this order before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. In addition to disputing the taxation on Rs. 1,930, it

The Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s Sony India Pvt Ltd

Court: Karnataka

APPEALS FILED AGAINST THE RE-ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED1307.2016 AND1407.2016 PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT- AND RECOVERY69) DVO-6, BENGALURU U/S391) AND UPHOLDING THE RE-ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED2612.2017 ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT)-2.3, DVO-2 BANGALORE, AND FOR THE TAX

The Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s Ws Retail Services Pvt Ltd

Court: Karnataka

LAYOUT HOSUR SARJAPUR ROAD BENGALURU-560 101 TIN:2990271265 REPRESENTED BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER-INDIRECT TAXES RESPONDENT (BY SHRI. P.E. UMESH, ADVOCATE) THIS TRIBUNAL MULTI STORIED BUILDING DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001.2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT-2.5) DVO-2, 5TH FLOOR ROOM NO.505, "A"

The Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s. Prakash Retail Pvt Ltd

Court: Karnataka

BY SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDERS DATED2110.2017 PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, (AUDIT)-3.3, BENGALURU FOR THE TAX PERIODS201213 TAXES (AUDIT AND RECOVERY - 6.9) BENGALURU-560 058.2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS-6) 2ND FLOOR, TTMC 'B' BLOCK BMTC

The Deputy Commissioner Vs. M/s. W.s. Retail Services Pvt Ltd

Court: Karnataka

FOR THE TAX PERIODS FROM201415. IN STRP No.44 OF2022BETWEEN:1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT & RECOVERY)-5, DVO MANGALURU VANIJYA YESHWANTHAPUR BENGALURU-560 022 STRP No.08 OF2022AND CONNECTED MATTERS62. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (APPEALS-1) 2ND FLOOR, TTMC 'B' BLOCK BMTC