Delightable - Judgment Search Results

Delight John vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 20TH JYAISHTA, 1946 PETITIONER/S: DELIGHT JOHN AGED 48 YEARS, S/O LATE. JOHN,VELIYAVEETTIL, CHALANCHUVADU PO, IDUKKI. BY ADV SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF

Delight John vs Branch Manager

Court: Kerala

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 20TH JYAISHTA, 1946 PETITIONER/S: DELIGHT JOHN AGED 54 YEARS S/O LATE JOHN, VELIYAVEETTIL, CHALANCHUVADU P.O, IDUKKI, PIN - 685 606 BY ADV L.RAJESH

Delight Mathew @ Jikku vs Dr.Shihabudhin

Court: Kerala

IN CC 1607/215 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT- VIII, ERNAKULAM (TEMPORARY), ERNAKULAM PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 AND 2 :1 DELIGHT MATHEW @ JIKKU AGED 30 YEARS S/O MATHEW P JACOB, OCHALIL PUTHENVEETIL HOUSE, WEST OF SABARI STORE, KUTTODU

Ross Delights, vs the Tahsildar,

Court: Kerala

HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 19TH KARTHIKA, 1943 PETITIONER: ROSS DELIGHTS, EDAYAR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA, MUPPATHADAM POST, ALWAYE, PIN-683 110 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MRS. GRACE GEORGE, W/O.

Ross Delights vs the Revenue Divisional Officer, Fort Kochi

Court: Kerala

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 WP(C).No.34778 OF 2019(V) PETITIONER/S: ROSS DELIGHTS, EDAYAR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA, MUPPATHADAM POST, ALWAYE, PIN-683 110, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MRS.GRACE GEORGE, W/O.GEORGE KUNJAPARAMBIL,

Ross Delights, vs Snehil Kumar Singh,

Court: Kerala

1941 Con.Case(C).No.423 OF 2019 IN WP(C). 20423/2018 ARISING FROM THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.06.2018 IN WP(C).NO. 20423/2018(C) PETITIONER/PETITIONER: ROSS DELIGHTS, EDAYAR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA, MUPPATHADAM POST, ALWAYE, PIN 683110, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MRS. GRACE GEORGE, W/O.

Delight Electrical Works and ors. Vs. New Deccan Hall and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2006(3)ALD436

the tenants of mulgi No. 22-6-169, situated a Pathergatti, Hyderabad. The tenancy was attorned in favour of M/s. Delight Electrical works, rep., by authorized Managing partner Sri Syed Ameemuddin only on receipt of the notice dated 13-5-1997

Delight Stores Vs. Income-tax Officer, E-ward and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1971]79ITR749(All)

The name of the firm at the head office was changed from 'Messrs. Whiteways General Stores' to 'Messrs. Delight Stores' and the name 'Messrs. Anarkali' at the branch office was changed to 'Royal Hosiery.'3. At the time

New Deccan Hall and ors. Vs. Delight Electrical Works and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALT518; (2004)189CTR(AP)42; [2003]260ITR337(AP)

Meena Kumari, J.1. This civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders dated November 21, 2001 passed in I. A. No. 1138 of 2001, in R. C....

Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Delight Steel Furniture

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: [1987]65STC329(Raj)

7 of the Act read with Rule 25 ?2. The facts, briefly stated, are as under : M/s. Delight Steel Furniture, Jaipur (hereinafter referred to as the assessee) carries on business at Jaipur and is registered as