Delhi Development Authority V Pushpendra - Judgment Search Results

S/Sh. Tajeshwar Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 79(1999)DLT254; 1999(49)DRJ677

Matched in: Court Delhi

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (Puda) and Another Vs. ...

Court: Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

substantiate this plea, reliance has been placed on the judgment of Honble Supreme Court of India reported as Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain, 56 (1994) DLT 408 (SC)=AIR 1995 SC 1. The next argument of the appellant is that … Estate Officer and Anr. v. Prem Lal, I (2002) CPJ 362=2000 (2) CON.LT 514. (Relied) [Para 4] 3. Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain, 56 (1994) DLT 408 (SC)=AIR 1995 SC 1. (Relied) [Para 8] Comparative Citation: 2008 (1) CPJ

Delhi Development Authority, N.D. and anr. Vs. Joint Action Committee, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008AIRSCW762; AIR2008SC1343; 2008(2)CTLJ508(SC); 146(2008)DLT609(SC); 2007(14)SCALE507; (2008)2SCC672; 2008(1)LH(SC)583

of this Court in Premji Bhai Parmar and Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority : [1980]2SCR704 as also on Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain : AIR1995SC1 , the respondents, on the other hand, contended that the right of registrants gets

indore Development Authority Vs. Sadhana Agarwal (Smt) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(3)SC1; 1995(2)SCALE135; (1995)3SCC1; [1995]2SCR555; 1995(2)LC146(SC)

flats on the original terms and conditions. Recently, the same question has been examined in the case of Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain : AIR1995SC1 . In respect of hike in the price of the flats, it was said:Mere

Kanpur Development Authority Vs. Smt. Sheela Devi and ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2004SC400; 2004(1)AWC739(SC); I(2004)CPJ12(SC); 2004(1)CTC368; 2004(1)CTLJ552(SC); JT2003(10)SC18; 2003(10)SCALE36; (2003)12SCC497; (2004)1UPLBEC662

the terms and conditions contained in the brochure.17. The learned counsel for the appellant cited two decisions in Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain, : AIR1995SC1 and Prashant Kumar Shahi v. Ghaziabad Development Authority, : [2000]2SCR896 in support of his … flats on the original terms and conditions. Recently, the same question has been examined in the case of Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain. In respect of hike in the price of the flats, it was said :'Mere identification or

Smt. Sunita Yadav vs.d.d.A.

Court: Delhi

Matched in: Court Delhi

Deepak Kumar vs.delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi

right to allotment of flat, for which purpose she relies on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain, AIR1995SC1 24. The entire issue, according to Ms. Takiar, stands covered by the decision of a

Mrs. Vandana GuptA. Vs.

Court: Allahabad

valid contract which determines the rights and obligations of the parties inter se. In AIR 1995 SC 1 (Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain) the Supreme Court has held that mere drawl of lots does not vest an indefeasible right

Directorate of Health Services Through: Its Secr Vs. Ms. Educational S ...

Court: Delhi

Matched in: Court Delhi

Smt. Bhagwati @ Roma Chugh Vs. M.P. Housing Board

Court: Madhya Pradesh

increased monthly instalments. On the contrary, the option was left over only to the allottees.... ..... .....”. In Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain - 1994 Supp (3) SCC 494 it has been held:“8. Mere identification or selection of the … to have an accrual of right merely on the basis of registration or the initial allotment letter.14. In Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpendra Kumar Jain (supra) it has been held:“8. Now coming to the other ground, we are unable to find