Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 3 - Judgment Search Results

State of Rajasthan Vs. Dr. J.P. Sharma and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1983CriLJ858; 1982()WLN60

passed by special judge for rajasthan jaipur city in special criminal case no 19 71 acquitting the accused respondents of the under sub section 2 of section 7 of the criminal law amendment act 1952 act no xli of 1952 for short sub section 2 of section 7 of the criminal law amendment act 1952 act no xli of 1952 for short the specified under sub section 2 of section 7 of the act the stage in ahluwalias case air 1971 sc 1552 supra p c old was applicable and in view of that section the order of the special judge patna was not to direct evidence that the three r rs ex 23 p 3 and p 20 were received by nathu lal or were

Officer-in-charge, Customs, Berhampur Preventive Unit Vs. Minati Biswa ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC219,1983(12)ELT798(Cal)

in force mr sanyal contends that the provisions of the criminal procedure code are subject to special and local laws and or any special form of procedure prescribed by ony other law for the time being in force mr sanyal contends that saves proceedings under customs act petition allowed bengal criminal law amendment act section 4 1 code of criminal procedure 1973 2 the provisions of the essential commodities act or the arms act 1955 in some cases as contemplated in section 455 cr remind ourselves of the provisions contained in the proviso to section 110 1 of the customs act which lays down provided v misrimal and anr reported in air 1977 madras 1551 3 the two cases cited above no doubt relate to investigation

Rajinder Kumar Sood Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1718

change brought about in section 197 1 by the new criminal p c section 197 of the earlier code apparently prescribed done above that the p c act and the criminal law amendment act are special statutes the provisions of the code sub section 3 of section 8 of the criminal law amendment act 1952 which applies the code only in so far the larger perspective of the provisions of the p c act and the criminal law amendment act leaves no manner of question be in the negative whether sanction in terms of section 197 1 of the criminal p c would still be to seven years or with fine or both sub section 3 of the section again raised a presumption of guilt if

V.R. Sreerama Rao Vs. Telugudesam, a Political Party and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1983AP96

provisions of the representation of the people act or the criminal law amendment act would apply only to those particluar individuals per se falls within the mischief of those provisions of law this argument appears to me wholly misconceived 13 neither the 153 a of the penal code or the 16th constitutional amendment to the decision in this case sri ramarao finally stated 14 of constitution of india section 123 3 of people act and section 153a of indian penal code 1860 petition filed constitution of india section 123 3 of people act and section 153a of indian penal code 1860 petition filed against allotment constitutional amendment and the prohibition contained in s 123 clause 3 of the representation of the people act should be read

Kartar Singh Vs. Union of India, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1983Delhi446

and allowances it appears from the impugned order that the criminal cases ended in a withdrawn it is true that when under sections 18811471353 indian penal code 7 33 32 criminal law amendment act 3133166 police restriction of rights act section 29 sections 18811471353 indian penal code 7 33 32 criminal law amendment act 3133166 police restriction of rights act section 29 of 32 criminal law amendment act 3133166 police restriction of rights act section 29 of the police act section 322122 of police criminal law amendment act 3133166 police restriction of rights act section 29 of the police act section 322122 of police incitement and cases under sections 18811471353 indian penal code 7 33 32 criminal law amendment act 3133166 police restriction of rights act

Tradesvel Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1982)84BOMLR608

was the challenge to section 15 2 b of the criminal law amendment act 1908 whereunder the state government had declared restrictions the court observed as follows at p 1162 a law designed to abate a grave nuisance and for protection of challenge to section 15 2 b of the criminal law amendment act 1908 whereunder the state government had declared a society is invalid it is further not disputed that the present act has received the assent of the president under article 254 advisory committee constituted under section 15 shall be final 16 section 6 gives power to the state government to constitute a the definition of dock employer and monthly worker in clauses 3 g and k respectively of the scheme and the obligation

New York Vs. Ferber

Court : US Supreme Court

from the opinion i have expressed concerning the imposition of criminal sanctions for the promotion of obscenity in other contexts footnote applying the sanctions contained in this act 1977 n y laws ch 910 1 footnote 9 t he use of children could the new york state legislature consistent with the first amendment prohibit the dissemination of material which shows children engaged in interest supporting the regulation is altogether absent when the commercial activity itself is illegal and the restriction on advertising is incidental judge rejected ferber s first amendment attack on the two sections in denying a motion to dismiss the indictment 96 misc supp 1981 ky rev stat 531 320 531 340 531 360 supp 1980 la rev stat ann 14 81 1 a

T. Barai Vs. Henry Ah Hoe and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC150; 1983CriLJ164; 1983(1)Crimes890(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1133; (1983)1SCC177; [1983]1SCR905

into force after the accused had been convicted of a criminal offence the court by majority of 2 1 answered the event of a conflict between a union and a state law in the concurrent field the former prevails over the latter prevention of adulteration of food drugs and cosmetics west bengal amendment act 1973 for short the west bengal amendment act were 16a of the act as introduced by the central amendment act and further whether the continued operation of the repealed west punishment which could be imposed for committing any offence under section 16 1 a was imprisonment for six years and fine by this act in excess of his powers under section 32 of the said code 7 on these provisions the maximum

D.P. Gopala Vs. Pushpaveni

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1982Kant329; 1982(1)KarLJ441

of proof necessarily is similar to one required in a criminal trial but subsequently the house of lords changed its view it is no doubt true that under the amended hindu law desertion for more than two years is made a ground proper 11 it is no doubt true that under the amended hindu law desertion for more than two years is made in a case of this nature under the hindu marriage act is akin to the standard required in a criminal trial judge has awarded rs 150 per month towards alimony under section 24 of the hindu marriage act it is submitted before the petitioner and his step mother treated her with cruelty 3 is the petitioner entitled to a decree of divorce 4

Brijlal Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1983CriLJ1511; 1982()WLN785

the court was the interpretation of section 5 2 of criminal p g the decision related to a reference in two his lordship was pleased to draw a distinction between the law relating to confiscation enumerated in section 517 1 of cr the accused under section 13 3 of the criminal law amendment ordinance the forfeiture under section 13 3 of that ordinance being under the penal code and not under any special act sections 4 2 and 5 of the cr p c from the observations in the case that forfeiture provided under section 53 is undoubtedly a penalty or punishment within the meaning the criminal law amendment ordinance the forfeiture under section 13 3 of that ordinance was not considered to be penal it