Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 3 - Judgment Search Results

In Re: N., a Pleader

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1935Cal742,159Ind.Cas.664

in making his country free from foreign bondage in another criminal proceeding he refused to take oath or to depose as not only convicted under section 17 1 and 2 criminal law amendment act but was convicted for having committed offences under only convicted under section 17 1 and 2 criminal law amendment act but was convicted for having committed offences under sections 178 penal code in proceeding under section 12 legal practitioners act showing that he had no faith in courts of justice rule is made absolute legal practitioners act xviii of 1879 section 12 pleader convicted under section 17 1 criminal law amendment as was said in emperor v bimalananda das 1924 cal 329 if the faith of the pleader in british justice should

Ananta Kumar Chakravarty Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 164Ind.Cas.285

of an offence under section 6 3 of the bengal criminal law amendment act of 1930 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment must be dismissed jack j 8 i agree bengal criminal law amendment act vi of 1930 sections 6 2 3 2 section 1 of section 2 of the bengal criminal law amendment act 1930 on june 6 1934 directing that he should the provisions of section 114 illustration e of the evidence act and the maxim omnia praesumentur rite esse acta and the i agree bengal criminal law amendment act vi of 1930 sections 6 2 3 2 notification under section 6 2 opinion 3 2 of the bengal criminal law amendment act 1930 3 the local government in exercise of the powers conferred by

Hiranmoy Bhowmik. Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1936Cal16,160Ind.Cas.743

williams j 1 this is a reference under section 438 criminal p c the learned advocate general on behalf of the and convicted of an offence under section 6 bengal criminal law amendment act 1930 that is to say he was a convicted of an offence under section 6 bengal criminal law amendment act 1930 that is to say he was a person grounds for the local government to believe that he has acted in contravention of the provisions of the arms act or lort williams j 1 this is a reference under section 438 criminal p c the learned advocate general on behalf was made on 7th january 1933 and was amended on 31st may 1933 there was a further order on 14th june

Hem Chandra Chongdar Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1935Cal681,159Ind.Cas.31

otherwise the statement indicated quite clearly that he had no criminal intention and that he acted purely from ignorance and that letters addressed to certain persons detained under the bengal criminal law amendment act one of the conditions of such detention is commission of an offence under section 6 bengal criminal law amendment act 6 of 1930 by detenu manindra nath guha alias must be shown that he wilfully and intentionally committed an act which he knew to be unlawful in the sense that certain dates intentionally abetted the commission of an offence under section 6 bengal criminal law amendment act 6 of 1930 by namely the postcard ex 5 and the two letters ex 3 which he received by post and delivered them secretly to

In re. Inland Steam Navigation Workers' Union

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1936Cal57

approach government and request that the notification under section 16 criminal law amendment act 1908 declaring the r s n and register the trade union 14 the corresponding section in english law is section 13 sub section 2 trade unions act of and request that the notification under section 16 criminal law amendment act 1908 declaring the r s n and ry workers based upon section 2 sub section 4 english trade unions act of 1913 that section provides that any person aggrieved by england additional provisions came into force by virtue of sub section 2 of section 2 of the act of 1913 which had been awarded in a suit under the said code 3 in the petition which brings the matter before us it

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. Kali Raman Bhatta ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1936Cal414,166Ind.Cas.297

sylhet who had convicted him under section 20 1 assam criminal law amendment act 1934 and sentenced him to suffer rigorous who had convicted him under section 20 1 assam criminal law amendment act 1934 and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment had convicted him under section 20 1 assam criminal law amendment act 1934 and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for address in bombay and calcutta in my opinion the assam act does not and is not intended to apply to such additional district magistrate of sylhet who had convicted him under section 20 1 assam criminal law amendment act 1934 and sentenced has gone and that authority should take the necessary steps 3 for these reasons it is necessary for such a person

Moti Lal Roy Vs. Emperor

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 164Ind.Cas.779

dated june 28 1934 under the provisions of the assam criminal law amendment act 1934 2 under the terms of the june 28 1934 under the provisions of the assam criminal law amendment act 1934 2 under the terms of the notification 28 1934 under the provisions of the assam criminal law amendment act 1934 2 under the terms of the notification originally on the eastern gadi babulal surana and surendra de were actually counting up the money at the time when the four passed against these two accused under s 392 read with section 120 b of the indian penal code under section 392 indian penal code and upon a charge made under section 392 read with section 120 b of the indian penal code

Emperor Vs. Asghar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1936All134

rest of the evidence for the prosecution under section 208 criminal p c and then commit 14 the answer to the be quashed on the ground that it is bad in law on account of the importance of the question of law am of the opinion that in view of the present amendment which has deleted the ambiguous words stop further proceedings the in ch 18 and it is therefore clear that when acting under section 347 the magistrate has to do something referable a l j 587 10 coming once more back to section 347 it is clear that it refers both to an when a magistrate proceeds to commit a case under section 347 to the court of session while conducting a trial or

A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

in part certiorari on the petition of defendants in a criminal case to review the judgment below insofar as it affirmed relate to practices which fall under the ban of existing law either common law or statute it is still only one was repugnant to the due process clause of the fifth amendment page 295 u s 520 the circuit court of appeals been clearly recognized in the application of the anti trust act where a combination or conspiracy is formed with the intent be instanced as open to the same objection if the sections of the code were to be examined one by one the city of new york approved by the president under 3 of the national industrial recovery act the alleged violations were

Gangadhar Marwari Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1936All150

the second stage of the proceedings provided by section 137 criminal p c so that the evidence not of the preliminary set aside and proceedings be taken afresh in accordance with law 2 the magistrate has submitted a lengthy explanation justifying the under section 139 a 2 which was added by the amending act 18 of 1923 proceedings under oh 10 criminal p section 139 a 2 which was added by the amending act 18 of 1923 proceedings under oh 10 criminal p c the proceedings and am of opinion that the requirements of section 139 a 2 cannot be considered to have been complied him to proceed according to law it is ordered accordingly 3 it is to be regretted that a case of such