Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 3 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: criminal law amendment act 2013 section 3 Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 472 results (1.519 seconds)A. Deivendran Vs. State of T.N.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-21-1997
Reported in : AIR1998SC2821; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)884; 1998CriLJ814; JT1997(8)SC619; 1997(6)SCALE516; (1997)11SCC720; [1997]Supp4SCR591
take cognizance of offence under section 8 1 of the criminal law amendment act 1952 would have no jurisdiction to take was specifically stated that if any magistrate not empowered by law to tender pardon under section 337 or 338 the same special judge by section 8 1 of the criminal law amendment act 1952 there is no reason why the legislature should taking recourse to presume under section 114 of the evidence act for the mere recovery of some of the ornaments belonging is accordingly set aside but instead they are convicted under section 411 ipc and are sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of three operation to cases mentioned in it the object of section 306 therefore is to allow pardon in cases where heinous offence
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMukesh and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-30-1997
Reported in : 1998CriLJ2439
an arbitrary manner this general principle governing the trial of criminal cases by the magistrates was embodied in section 350 of the ends of justice where the provisions prescribed by the law of procedure are intended to be mandatory the legislature indicates or another judge were substituted and or inserted the same amendment was later on made w e f 18 12 78 general rule of summary trial of all offences under the act was not contemplated by the legislature in any circumstances to the act may be examined 23 clause a i of section 7 1 provides for punishment of certain offences specified therein proceedings have been submitted to a superior magistrate under section 325 44 section 326 it may be noted is an enabling
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKamal Chatterjee Vs. the State of West Bengal
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-02-1997
Reported in : (1998)2CALLT98(HC),1998(1)CHN139
the act and the accused may be charged under the criminal procedure code at the same trial with that other offence court appointed under section 2 of the west bengal criminal law amendment special courts act 1949 are competent to take cognizance state of west bengal enacted the west bengal criminal law amendment special courts act 1949 to provide for speedy trial and 2 of the west bengal criminal law amendment special courts act 1949 ceased to have jurisdiction and all special judges functioning sections 6 7 8 9 and 10 by reason of section 13 of the west bengal act of 1949 as amended a judge to preside over a special court sub section 3 of section 2 makes it clear that every special court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFakhruddIn Sharafali Ampanwala Vs. State
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Aug-04-1997
Reported in : 1997(5)ALD735; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)623; 1998CriLJ439
under various provisions of chapter xxxiii of the code of criminal procedure including s 438 thereof once the special court has a chief judicial magistrate may pass any sentence authorised by law except a sentence of death or of imprisonment for life the view that s 7 1 of the criminal law amendment act 1952 created a condition which is sine qua non judge who is entrusted to try cases arising under the acts for the whole of the state of andhra pradesh the new court shall follow for trial of offences before it section 8 1 specifically says that a special judge in trial the prevention of corruption act 1988 ss 7 and 13 3 the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act 1985 s 36
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Maharashtra Vs. Rajendra Jawanmal Gandhi
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-11-1997
Reported in : 1997(2)ALD(Cri)490; 1997(45)BLJR1644; JT1997(8)SC43; 1997(6)SCALE80; (1997)8SCC386
treatment by the police and continue through a male dominated criminal justice system acquittal of many de facto guilty rapists adds its 69th report on the indian evidence act 1872 the law commission had also recommended reform in the law nothing however changes in the law on rape and allied offences and amendments to the laws of procedure and evidence the commission submitted the ipc in its 69th report on the indian evidence act 1872 the law commission had also recommended reform in the satara for offences under section 376 indian penal code and section 57 of the bombay children act 1948 high court upheld imposed by the high court for the offence under section 376 read with section 511 i in its 69th report on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSadhan Kumar Boral and anr. and Chittaranjan Das and ors. Vs. the Stat ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-21-1997
Reported in : (1998)1CALLT186(HC),1997CriLJ2117
in the year 1988 8 it was contended that the criminal law amendment act 1952 a central act came into force in the code of criminal procedure or in any other law for the time being in force the offences under the year 1988 8 it was contended that the criminal law amendment act 1952 a central act came into force and section under section 13 of that act the prevention of corruption act 1947 and the criminal law amendment act 1952 stood repealed of special judges who were appointed by the notification under section 2 of the west bengal special courts act 1949 and be tried only by a special judge appointed under section 3 of the said act and not by any other court
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Madhusudhan Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Chief Secret ...
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jul-28-1997
Reported in : 1997(5)ALT8
a bench specially earmarked for hearing such cases 4 all criminal cases registered with the police against tribals as accused which treads on the path of law and implements all the laws in letter and spirit and leaves no person to complain 8422 of 1995 and batch the supreme court held that amendments were prospective and not retrospective the counter affidavit also states penal code and other relevant laws including criminal law amendment act at jeelugumilli p s buttaigudem ps jangareddigudem p s polavaram no medical facilities are provided the photographs published in a section of press reveals the pathetic story of the tribals there of tribals 13896 extent covered by col no 5 6828 33 acres7 no of cases in which land was restoredto the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindra Narayana Ganguly Vs. the State of West Bengal
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Feb-21-1997
Reported in : (1998)1CALLT147(HC),1997CriLJ2870
leading to the cases are that on the ground of criminal breach of trust by the petitioner in disbursing the salary with retrospective effect is illegal and not permissible under the law 20 the same could have been done by a central the prevention of corruption act 1947 and the criminal law amendment act 1952 stood repealed 9 a conjoint reading of section by that act and particularly under section 13 of that act the prevention of corruption act 1947 and the criminal law act in west bengal so no judge was appointed under section 6 of 1952 act and the old appointment of the of a power conferred by sub section 1 of section 3 of the prevention of corruption act 1988 as such taking
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDayaram Chandramohan Kanswal Vs. the Inspector of Police, Kapurbawdi P ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-26-1997
Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)95; 1997CriLJ2713
mandatory provisions of sections 174 and 176 of code of criminal procedure p since we were not happy with this affidavit to the statement of objects and reasons of the criminal law amendment act 1983 as a result of which section 498a the statement of objects and reasons of the criminal law amendment act 1983 as a result of which section 498a was amended and new section 113a was inserted in the evidence act since we have already referred to these aspects in details to the nearest executive magistrate empowered to hold inquests sub section 3 of section 174 of the code of criminal procedure c r 211 of 1996 was the crime under sections 302 201 read with section 34 of i p c no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Bureau of Investigation Vs. Subodh Kumar Dutta and Another
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-17-1997
Reported in : AIR1997SC869; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)583; 1997CriLJ1173; JT1997(1)SC726; RLW1997(2)SC267; 1997(1)SCALE406; (1997)10SCC567; [1997]1SCR365
we request may dispose of the matter expeditiously no costs criminal bribe sections 5 1 d and 5 2 of prevention bengal special courts act 1949 and not under the criminal law amendment act 1952 after cognizance had been taken by the bengal act of 1949 and not under the criminal law amendment act of 1952 but submits that both on the date take cognizance of the offence under the prevention of corruption act 1947 as that court had not been constituted pursuant to single judge of the high court was not invited to section 30 supra for had it been so invited we have judge of the high court was not invited to section 30 supra for had it been so invited we have no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT