Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 3 - Judgment Search Results

Public Prosecutor Vs. Shaik Sheriff

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1965AP372; 1965CriLJ585

misconduct was created for the investigation of an offence of criminal misconduct the same restriction was placed on officers below the that g o being self contained would be valid and lawful and would be sufficient compliance with the law but he the investigation had been done before the prevention of corruption amendment act 59 of 1952 was passed their lordships stated that charges against him were under s 5 2 of the act and also under ss 120b i p c and 420 6 1963 in exercise of the same power namely under section 6 of the criminal law amendment act appointing with effect authority conferred on the delegate by s 20 or s 36 1 we must therefore hold that the third and the

Sunil Kumar Paul Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC706; 1965CriLJ630; [1964]7SCR70

trial in accordance with the provisions of the code of criminal procedure the accused could be charged with an offence under distinction between absence of legislative power which will make the law made by an incompetent legislature wholly void and exercise of he could under s 7 3 of the criminal law amendment act try other offences under the code of criminal procedure 1949 w b act xxi of 1949 hereinafter called the act as it involved an offence punishable under s 409 i corruption act for an offence under s 120b read with sections 466 467 420 i p c and that the other medical certain bills were to be drawn under the heading 39 public health some other bills were drawn under other headings

Manipur Administration Vs. Thokchom, Bira Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC87; [1964]7SCR123

point made regarding the decision of the english court of criminal appeal in r v connelly 1963 3 all e r it is not necessary to enter 4 the question of law that arises in this case is by reason of a indian penal code and s 7 of the criminal law amendment act and a few days later the respondent was arrested charge of murdering the woman during the commission of the act in an unanimous judgment by which the appeal of the 236 or for which he might have been convicted under section 237 2 a person acquitted or convicted of any offence a close examination of the judgment r v connelly 1963 3 all e r 510 through which learned counsel for the

Rookes (A.P.) Vs. Barnard and Others

Court : House of Lords

need for exemplary damages are not generally speaking within the criminal law and could not even if the criminal law was no suggestion in this case that you should 8212 the law is clear without any recourse to the doctrine of estoppel intimidation donovan l j pertinently referred to the criminal law amendment act 1871 which makes it an offence to use violence section is dealing with the requisites of a cause of action an alternative is to treat the only ground as meaning some length when i come to the second half of section 3 he said it is clear that if there be other so called wrongful acts including particularly breaches of contract 3 if the tort of intimidation does so extend then is

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Amar Chand and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1965HP11,1965CriLJ169

etc i p c and under section 7 of the criminal law amendment act for gathering in a public place in verdict of acquittal pronounced by a competent court on a lawful charge and after a lawful trial is not completely stated p c and under section 7 of the criminal law amendment act for gathering in a public place in defiance of that the finding in the case under the motor vehicles act that he was not driving the bus at the relevant in view of his findings recorded in the maincase under section 304 a i p c which havebecome conclusive and binding did not file any appeal against the order of acquittal 3 the learned magisrtate then tried summarily the case under sections

Masalti Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC202; [1964]8SCR133

substantially rests the incidentwhich has given rise to the present criminal proceedings took place on the 29thnovember 1961 in village bilati in the case of baladin 1956crilj345 assume significance otherwise in law it would not be correct to say thatbefore a person adopted what it thought to be a safe test before acting on directevidence it has held that unless at least four deciding whether the sentence of death shouldbe confirmed or not section 374 provides that the sentence of death shall notbe executed fully justified mr sawhney contendsthat this essential requirement of s 374 has not been complied with by thehigh court when it

Nachiappan and ors. Vs. P.R. Muthiah Ambalam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1966Mad77

be paid over to the mortgagor as there was a criminal case pending against the mortgagor in connection with an alleged in the earlier proceedings though those proceedings ended according to law should be taken in favour of the plaintiff s contention of the cases referred to above were prior to the amendment of s 84 the proviso to s 84 was enacted s 84 the proviso to s 84 was enacted by act xx of 1929 to my mind the proviso was only mortgage amount into court under an original petition filed under section 83 of the transfer of property act iv of 1882 would represent the mesne profits for the period in question 3 the plaintiff s appeal and the short question that has

Deputy Inspector General of Police, Coimbatore and ors. Vs. P. Amalana ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1966Mad203; (1964)2MLJ421

this substantial distinction between the proceedings in a civil or criminal court on the one hand and the proceedings in a respondent took us through several chapters of craies on statute law dealing with absolute and directory enactments he stressed on the wrote to the government on 18 3 1932 suggesting an amendment to o 244 in the 1926 edition of the police that departmental proceedings were not governed by the indian evidence act observed that to satisfy to the rules of natural justice services to be performed by them a comparison of this section with s 9 of the madras district police act shows officers of the police department p s o no 90 3 b before us subsequent to amendment read as follows at

Poona Electric Supply Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1967Bom27; (1965)67BOMLR534; 1967CriLJ155; ILR1966Bom154

true continue in force but for the purpose of a criminal prosecution they cannot be properly described as being laws in impotentia excusat legem which means inability is an excuse in law and argumentum ab impossibly plurimum valet in lege which means act x of 1910 sections 33 36a 37 indian electricity amendment act xxxii of 1959 section 24 general clauses act x other purposes still no punishment as provided under the new act can be made for violation of the rules made under 1 was re enacted all notifications issued under the earlier section 33 were continued in force by virtue of section 24 that excludes the retrospective application of any subsequent law article 31 1 on the other hand does not use the expression

The State Vs. Om Parkash Salig Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1966CriLJ366

provisions with regard to jurisdiction contained in section 188 of criminal p c and in any case this view is not the special enactments or other instruments having the force of law be it against original appellate decree or order heard and pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause the a charge of an offence under the child marriage restraint act committed in french territory cannot be inquired into in british counsel for the state with regard to the applicability of section 531 of the code of criminal procedure it seems plain in re m l verghese a i r 1947 mad 352 vahya ali j held that the proviso to section 188