Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 28 - Judgment Search Results

State of Gujarat Vs. Jaman Haji Mamad Jat and 3 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1584; (2007)2GLR1165

sentences were awarded for the offence under section 3 of criminal law amendment act as well as for the offence under in question which have been satisfactorily proved by the prosecution law on this point is very clear and we have discussed the explosive substances act 1908 section 3 of criminal law amendment act sections 3 and 6 of indian passport rules entry under section 6 1 a of indian wireless and telegraphic act all the sentences were ordered to run concurrently 4 being acquitted for the offence under section 489 a read with section 34 of the indian penal code 3 they were sentenced 07 2000 of mark 160 21 ex 18190 report dated 28 09 2000 of mark 160 22 ex 18291 report dated

Sri Ram Sah and ors. Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(4)JCR644(Jhr)]

of the informant under section 323 of the code of criminal procedure for commitment to the court of sessions 2 the indian penal code and under section 17 of the criminal law amendment act against 17 named accused and several unknown the penal code and under section 17 of the criminal law amendment act against 17 named accused and several unknown the police persons belonged to his village who were engaged in extremist activities and for such reason none of the villagers used to criminal procedure by a detailed order included the offence under section 307 149 of the indian penal code in the charge

Azeem Son of Mohd. Rasheed Vs. State of U.P. and

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2956

under section 302 307 504 ipc and section 7 of criminal law amendment act police station rosa district shahjahanpur be transferred section 302 307 504 ipc and section 7 of criminal law amendment act police station rosa district shahjahanpur be transferred to 302 307 504 ipc and section 7 of criminal law amendment act police station rosa district shahjahanpur be transferred to the trial was pending in the court of special judge ec act court no 9m shahjahanpur which was presided over by g the session trial no 198 02 state v azeem under section 302 307 504 ipc and section 7 of criminal law

In Re: 122 Prisoners

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3241; 2006(4)KLT597

state and the working conditions and infrastructure provided in the criminal courts are deplorable and in bad shape the number of competent jurisdiction or and prosecute the offender under the penal law 8 ordering costs and damages against the state is only steps for the application of the provisions contained in the amendment act relating to plea bargaining in appropriate cases in which party to claim compensation under the private law in an action based on tort through a suit instituted in a court against judgment of single judge is not maintainable provisions of section 100 a c p c will prevail over the provisions of police as per the order of this court dated 28 09 2006 in this cr m c in obedience to

Cbi Vs. Bimal Kumar Das

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2006)3CALLT512(HC),2006(4)CHN403

prevention of corruption act 1947 but section 13 of the criminal law amendment special courts act 1949 introduced in 1953 specifically the offences under the prevention of corruption act 1947 criminal law amendment act 1952 came into force section 6 of which the special courts appointed under the west bengal criminal law amendment special courts act 1949 are validated as if the west of the said act section 30 2 of the said act of 1988 is the saving clause clearly providing that notwithstanding sessions the trial commences after a charge is framed under section 228 and there is no trial before the charge is dropped the proceeding and discharged the accused by order dated 28 02 95 holding that the order of taking cognizance was

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. K.C. Balasubramanium

Court : Kolkata

bank of india new market branch calcutta entered into a criminal conspiracy with the said bikash sengupta and sanctioned a loan by the special courts appointed under the west bengal criminal law amendment special courts act 1949 are validated as if the of the act of 1988 incorporated by the west bengal amendment act of 1994 conferred validity on the actions of special under or in pursuance of the corresponding provisions of 1988 act section 26 of the 1988 act which deals with special law amendment act 1952 were repealed and by virtue of sections 3 and 4 of the said act of 1988 offences 07 90 3 the o p filed an application on 28 04 94 challenging the order of taking cognizance contending that

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Joydeb Dasgupta

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(1)CHN458

corruption act 1988 prevention of corruption act 1947 as also criminal law amendment act 1952 were repealed and by virtue of not permissible and taking of cognizance twice is bad in law 2 though the provision of limitation contained in section 468 offences under the prevention of corruption act 1947 criminal law amendment act 1952 came into force section 6 of which empowered jurisdiction to try the offence under the prevention of corruption act 1988 though the special court case no 1 90 in act 1947 criminal law amendment act 1952 came into force section 6 of which empowered all the state governments to appoint sukanta sarkar purchased the kdr bearing no 372 87 dated 28 11 87 for rs 5 00 000 from rabindra sarani

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Santosh Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC2648; 2006CriLJ3636; JT2006(6)SC320; 2006(7)SCALE101; (2006)6SCC1

prescribing liability according to the culpability of each kind of criminal conduct it ordinarily allows some significant discretion to the judge social consciousness of society therefore in operating the sentencing system law should adopt the corrective machinery or the deterrence based on 375 and 376 have been substantially changed by criminal law amendment act 1983 and several new sections were introduced by the the very nature of the offence it is an obnoxious act of the highest order the physical scar may heal up barkare alia dalap singh 2005crilj3117 both in cases of sub sections 1 and 2 of section 376 the court has the dennis councils mcgdautha v state of callifornia 402 us 183 28 l d 2d 711 that no formula of a foolproof

State of Rajasthan and Etc. Vs. Ram Niwas and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2477; 2006(1)WLC563

provisions of sections 306 and 307 of the code of criminal procedure can be assumed to be directly or indirectly concerned any other witness appended to the two important questions of law as mentioned above are also usual questions like the testimony the court of special judge appointed under the criminal law amendment act 1952 46 of 1952 b any offence punishable with crime consisting of a series of acts one or more acts are committed by the person one is said to be 3 2005 we acquit the appellants of the offence under sections 303 34 and 376 g i p c further we the benefit of section 306 cr p c to him 28 now if a person does not qualify as an approver

Ramesh Kumar Upadhyaya Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2247

in nature and not punitive moreover it is not a criminal trial it is only for the purpose of saving the the continued detention of the petitioner is rendered bad in law and deserves to be set aside because of non consideration of 2005 under section 364a ipc and 7 criminal law amendment act the petitioner was trying to get released on bail 2005 under section 364a ipc and 7 criminal law amendment act the petitioner was trying to get released on bail and case motor vehicles act 1988 c a no 59 1988 section 168 s b sinha h s bedi jj determination of for the petitioner we find that in paras 20 and 28 of the petition it is averred that it is very