Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013 Section 28 - Judgment Search Results

Damodar Ganesh and ors. Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1951Bom459; (1951)53BOMLR739; 1953CriLJ37

india has been restricted under sub section 7 of the criminal law amendment act we do not think that itcould be given power to make such adaptations and modifications in the law in force in the territory of india immediately before the the restriction imposed by section 7 of the criminal law amendment act the court should in pronouncing upon the reasonableness or on 4th october 1935 and became a governor general s act on 17th december 1935 i e one day prior to second submission made by mr vyas is based on sub section 2 of section 67b of the government of india act 26th january 1950 it has been laid down in section 28 thereof that any court tribunal or authority required or empowered

In Re: V. Vengan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1952Mad95; (1951)2MLJ241

state ordinances forbidding loitering or picketting and making it a criminal offence were invalid under those ordinances workers were arrested convicted been closed at any rate in this state by a law implementing this policy and such law has not been held tioners are confirmed under section 1 1 b criminal law amendment act and the sentences reduced to the period they had illegal though it was under section 7 criminal law amendment act was in pursuance of the policy of prohibition and all their own admissions petitioners are guilty of this offence under section 7 2 no court shall take cognizance of an offence

Tarapada De and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1951SC174; 1951CriLJ400; (1951)IMLJ431(SC); [1951]2SCR212

7 of preventive detention act 1950 section 16 of bengal criminal law amendment act 1930 and articles 22 5 132 and of preventive detention act 1950 section 16 of bengal criminal law amendment act 1930 and articles 22 5 132 and 132 1915 sections 4 proviso 47 as it stood prior to amendment act no 22 of 2000 dr arijit pasayat tarun chatterjee detention sections 3 3 1 and 7 of preventive detention act 1950 section 16 of bengal criminal law amendment act 1930 appellants applied for a rule of habeas corpus separately under section 491 of the criminal procedure code and on the 21st

Pralhad Krishna Kurane Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1952Bom1; (1951)53BOMLR717; ILR1952Bom134

to us upon the analogy of a sentence in a criminal trial it appears that when the argument that there would that the detention under the provisions of the bengal criminal law amendment act and the west bengal security ordinance 1942 was illegal 31 on february 22 1951 the preventive deten tion amendment act no iv 4 of 1951 was passed on february the preventive detention act grounds under section 7 of the act were furnished to him on 17 3 1950 on 15 detenu accordingly and report compliance now if we turn to section 11 of the act we find that it lays down of government issued under the bombay public security measures act 28 the government pleader has next drawn our attention to section

Ananda Sankar and ors. Vs. Chief Secretary to the Government of West B ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1953Cal129

by the state government under section 16 of the indian criminal law amendment act 37 the second ground was in these under the provisions of section 16 of the indian criminal law amendment act a provision which is ultra vires the constitution the provisions of section 16 of the indian criminal law amendment act a provision which is ultra vires the constitution of a further ground in which details of the detenus communistic activities were stated were sufficient to support a valid order for were submitted in both the cases on march 16 1951 section 9 of the amending act provides that the appropriate government detenu himself should send it to the board on april 28 the board apparently made an order upholding the detention of

Prabhat Malla Barooah Vs. D.C. and ors.

Court : Guwahati

committed it proceeds to arrest the accused person under the criminal law amendment act instead of an in formant setting the me then that the declaration made under section 16 criminal law amendment act stands on the same footing as an information madras high court was a case under the criminal law amendment act 1908 as amended by the madras legislature with all as distinguished from unlawful associations under the criminal law amendment act is dealt with in the indian penal code beginning with until a declaration is made by the provincial government under section 16 of the act the police cannot arrest the offender

R.R. Chari Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1951SC207; 1951CriLJ775; (1951)IMLJ617(SC); [1951]2SCR312

penal code become cognizable notwithstanding what is provided in the criminal procedure code the proviso to section 3 of the act court to grant bail after the provisions of the criminal law amendment act were applied to the case in our opinion the provisions of part 1 of the indian criminal law amendment act should be made to apply to the proceedings in taking cognizance does not involve any formal action or indeed action of any kind but occurs as soon as a magistrate is provided in the criminal procedure code the proviso to section 3 of the act puts only two limitations on the

In Re: N. Swaminatha Iyer and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1952Mad727

p c and section 477 a i p c the criminal conspiracy alleged is said to have the object of defrauding monies assets and securities of the said hanuman bank ltd lawfully entrusted to him under the domination of the managing director was necessitated also by section 5 of the criminal law amendment act 1913 making sanction necessary for conspiracy to commit a not then in existenceand was enacted by the criminal procedureamendment act xviii of 1923 under thissection persons may be charged and 234 235 239 and 439 of criminal procedure code 1898 sections 107 109 120a 120b 409 and 477a of indian penal plantations a concern promoted by this bank accused 22 to 28 are all bank constituents of long standing who were granted

Narendra Gopal Das Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1951Cal505

entirely insufficient to establish the charge under section 17 l criminal law amendment act it was alleged in the charge that west bengal security act 1948 this ordinance could not in law support the conviction for any alleged offence or act said to establish the charge under section 17 l criminal law amendment act it was alleged in the charge that the petnr that the conviction under section 11 3 west bengal security act 1950 is bad in as much as on the date set aside 9 as to the petnr s conviction under section 17 l criminal law amendment act it was argued that

Kewal Ram Vs. Bhagwan Dass and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1951HP61

made provisions for the hearing of original cases both civil criminal appeals revisions the chief judicial officer s court being a into force on 15 8 1918 it consolidated amended the law relating to courts in himachal pradesh and it also provided the repeal does not affect the continuance of the said amendments in the state courts act 1943 made by bhe himachal case it will read as follows the merged states laws act 1949 made after the commencement of the general clauses act composite of section 96 c p code such provisions as sections 20 21 bengal agra assam civil courts act xii 12